[Bug middle-end/78519] missing warning for sprintf %s with null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78519 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78519] missing warning for sprintf %s with null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78519 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 15 04:35:31 2016 New Revision: 243684 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243684=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78519 - missing warning for sprintf %s with null pointer

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/78774] [6/7 Regression] ICE in constexpr string literals and templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|7.0 | --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---

[Bug c++/78774] [6/7 Regression] ICE in constexpr string literals and templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 15 03:08:14 2016 New Revision: 243683 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243683=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78774 - [6/7 Regression] ICE in constexpr string literals and templates

[Bug target/78213] [7 Regression] -fself-test fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213 --- Comment #12 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78213.c often times out: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78213.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78213.c -fself-test (test for warnings,

[Bug target/78213] [7 Regression] -fself-test fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Dec 15 01:47:48 2016 New Revision: 243681 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243681=gcc=rev Log: Introduce selftest::locate_file gcc/ChangeLog: * Makefile.in

[Bug target/78818] New: msp430 persistent attribute is not applied correctly in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818 Bug ID: 78818 Summary: msp430 persistent attribute is not applied correctly in some cases Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Extension / variation of the test case: programread_exp_data implicit none type experimental_data_t character(len=:), dimension(:), allocatable :: header end type

[Bug go/78763] go1: internal compiler error: in do_get_backend, at go/gofrontend/expressions.cc:8352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763 --- Comment #6 from Jiri Danek --- I can reproduce this on OpenSuse Tumbleweed (in Docker) $ docker run --rm -it jdanekrh/gcc-78763-opensuse make ]...] [ 66%] Built target reactor_send_cpp Scanning dependencies of target go-build #

[Bug bootstrap/78817] stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/77834] [7 Regression] ICE: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1311 with -O -ftree-pre -mstringop-strategy=libcall

#13 from Bill Schmidt --- The new test case fails on the GCC 6.3 release candidate for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu: spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/xgcc -B/home/wschmidt/g cc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/ /home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

#8 from Bill Schmidt --- The new test case fails on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu in the GCC 6.3 RC: spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/xgcc -B/home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/ /home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78540.c -fno

[Bug driver/78772] -fstrict-aliasing should turn on Wstrict-aliasing automaticly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/78791] [7 regression] ACATS cxf2001 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78786] GCC hangs/out of memory calling sprintf with large precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78786] GCC hangs/out of memory calling sprintf with large precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Dec 14 21:58:19 2016 New Revision: 243672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243672=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78786 - GCC hangs/out of memory calling sprintf with large precision

[Bug bootstrap/78817] stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/78791] [7 regression] ACATS cxf2001 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 14 21:39:51 2016 New Revision: 243671 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243671=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78791 * config/i386/i386.h (enum ix86_stack_slot): Add

[Bug c++/78813] constexpr function returns wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813 --- Comment #3 from Charles --- Thanks; didn't find that ticket before I submitted the bug. Validated that the error does not occur on a fresh gcc-6-branch checkout.

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/78817] stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #8) > Thanks that looks good. I will test it when I have a chance. I am changing > the Qt sources to not assume the presence of __builtin_clzs when __BMI__ is > defined.

[Bug middle-end/17308] nonnull attribute not as useful as it could be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/78817] New: stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817 Bug ID: 78817 Summary: stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status:

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --- The above patch also reintroduces reintroduces __builtin_clzs and __builtin_ctzs to mainline.

[Bug c++/72775] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78814] ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug sanitizer/78815] [7 Regression] ICE: segfault with -fopenmp -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/72775] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Dec 14 20:41:43 2016 New Revision: 243669 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243669=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/72775 * init.c (perform_member_init): Diagnose member

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Dec 14 20:27:06 2016 New Revision: 243668 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243668=gcc=rev Log: PR target/59874 * config/i386/i386-builtin.def: Add

[Bug middle-end/17308] nonnull attribute not as useful as it could be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308 --- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool --- powerpc64-linux, even.

[Bug middle-end/17308] nonnull attribute not as useful as it could be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I do apologise, it seems that Mr Reid did not do his usual update. We will have to work from the draft standard itself. Paul On 14 December 2016 at 20:36, paul.richard.thomas at

[Bug debug/77844] [5/7 Regression] Compilation of simple C++ example exhaust memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 14 19:40:05 2016 New Revision: 243662 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243662=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/77844 * valtrack.c: Include rtl-iter.h. (struct

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Janus, Yes there is one - I had it open but somehow provided the link to the wrong one... Paul On 14 December 2016 at 19:20, janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr > with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf This document

[Bug debug/59161] GDB pretty printers: iterator->reference not printed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||palves at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #1) > +1 > > Can you remind us which F15 features we have already? > > On https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News I see: > * Support for IMPLICIT NONE (external, type). > *

[Bug c++/78816] New: [c++14] Static auto variable usage in generic/variadic lambda fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78816 Bug ID: 78816 Summary: [c++14] Static auto variable usage in generic/variadic lambda fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/59171] pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > In the general case we can't print the correct value, because we may not be > able to increment the 'current' member to point to the object that would >

[Bug c/78673] sprintf missing attribute nonnull on destination argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78673 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/17308] nonnull attribute not as useful as it could be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/59171] pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Actually I'm not sure what can be done to fix this. In the general case we can't print the correct value, because we may not be able to increment the 'current' member to point to the object that would

[Bug c++/78701] [6/7 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression N of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78701] [6/7 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression N of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Dec 14 17:23:06 2016 New Revision: 243660 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243660=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78701 * pt.c (type_unification_real): Check tsubst arg

[Bug middle-end/17308] nonnull attribute not as useful as it could

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Dec 14 17:23:16 2016 New Revision: 243661 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243661=gcc=rev Log: PR c/78673 - sprintf missing attribute nonnull on destination argument PR c/17308

[Bug c/78673] sprintf missing attribute nonnull on destination argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78673 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Dec 14 17:23:16 2016 New Revision: 243661 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243661=gcc=rev Log: PR c/78673 - sprintf missing attribute nonnull on destination argument PR c/17308 -

[Bug fortran/78815] ICE: segfault with -fopenmp -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- This concerns several files from testsuite/gfortran.dg : goacc/default_none.f95 goacc/kernels-alias-4.f95 goacc/kernels-loop-2.f95

[Bug fortran/78815] New: ICE: segfault with -fopenmp -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815 Bug ID: 78815 Summary: ICE: segfault with -fopenmp -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78814] New: ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814 Bug ID: 78814 Summary: ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/77553] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with post-increment operator in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77553 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charles.frasch at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/78813] constexpr function returns wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78727] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78813] constexpr function returns wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/78701] [6/7 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression N of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Dec 14 16:45:33 2016 New Revision: 243657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243657=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78701 * pt.c (type_unification_real): Check tsubst arg

[Bug c++/69481] ICE with C++11 alias using with templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69481 --- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Dec 14 16:43:07 2016 New Revision: 243656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243656=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69481 * cp-tree.h (TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO_MAYBE_ALIAS):

[Bug c++/78813] New: constexpr function returns wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813 Bug ID: 78813 Summary: constexpr function returns wrong value Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/78812] New: Wrong code generation due to hoisting memory load across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812 Bug ID: 78812 Summary: Wrong code generation due to hoisting memory load across function call Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/78811] [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 --- Comment #8 from James Greenhalgh --- Is anyone currently looking at this? If the bug is still blocked on correcting the profile information (which sounds like a large job), should we consider weakening or reverting the cost model for GCC 7?

[Bug target/78417] target_clones default for powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- Bounty available!

[Bug target/78417] target_clones default for powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to uros from comment #9) > Author: uros > Date: Wed Dec 14 15:44:07 2016 > New Revision: 243651 This patch reintroduces __builtin_clzs and __builtin_ctzs to gcc-6 branch to resolve compatibility

[Bug target/78811] [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01272.html

[Bug target/78811] [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- Started somewhere between 243555 and 243578. Requires -mcpu=power7 or lower. Works with -mcpu=power8. Possibly r243578 combine.c change.

[Bug c++/77830] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968, when using constexpr (with testcase)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77830 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40324|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Dec 14 15:44:07 2016 New Revision: 243651 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243651=gcc=rev Log: PR target/59874 * config/i386/i386.c (enum ix86_builtins):

[Bug target/78811] [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78811] New: [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811 Bug ID: 78811 Summary: [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/78791] [7 regression] ACATS cxf2001 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 40339 [details] > gcc7-pr78791.patch > > Untested fix. I don't see other easy fix than not reusing temporaries > between those from the

[Bug target/77933] Stack corruption on ARM when using high registers and __builtin_return_address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug target/77904] [ARM Cortex-M0] Frame pointer thrashes registers if assembly statements with "sp" clobber are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug target/78791] [7 regression] ACATS cxf2001 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/59170] pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 14 15:17:57 2016 New Revision: 243650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243650=gcc=rev Log: Make printers detect invalid debug mode iterators PR libstdc++/59170

[Bug libgcc/78804] [RX] -m64bit-doubles does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/78791] [7 regression] ACATS cxf2001 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78810] [7 Regression] Optimized out volatile memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78810 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2016-12-14 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/78810] New: [7 Regression] Optimized out volatile memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78810 Bug ID: 78810 Summary: [7 Regression] Optimized out volatile memory access Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78757] [7 Regression] ICE with function returning a pointer to a character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40338 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40338=edit gcc7-pr78757.patch The following untested patch fixes the ICE for me, but whether it is right, dunno...

[Bug c++/77659] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8858

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/78809] Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 --- Comment #2 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > We may have dups of this. And we now have inlining for strcmp/memcmp when > the > result is only compared against zero. I don't see that happening

[Bug middle-end/78809] Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1

[Bug other/78808] target_clones not applying to openmp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78809] New: Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 Bug ID: 78809 Summary: Inline strcmp with small constant strings Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78757] [7 Regression] ICE with function returning a pointer to a character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757 > > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- > So the bug is that nothing has gimplified

[Bug fortran/78757] [7 Regression] ICE with function returning a pointer to a character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- So the bug is that nothing has gimplified the MAX_EXPR in: character(kind=1)[1:MAX_EXPR <_1, 0>] * pstr.0; struct FRAME.MAIN__ FRAME.3; character(kind=1)[1:30] * s; integer(kind=4) _1;

[Bug c++/78771] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when using inherited constructors (instantiate_template_1 in gcc/cp/pt.c:17391)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/77585] g++ incorrectly decides that member function is called without object in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 40337 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40337=edit Let's try that again ...

[Bug c++/77585] g++ incorrectly decides that member function is called without object in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77585] g++ incorrectly decides that member function is called without object in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 --- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, the bug is in the arm backend. I posted a patch to fix it at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00849.html

[Bug libstdc++/59170] pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > "print it" should not automatically dereference. The Python code that registers the printers for iterators even says: # These shouldn't be

[Bug other/78808] target_clones not applying to openmp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 --- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan --- Created attachment 40335 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40335=edit compiled with -fopenmp

[Bug other/78808] target_clones not applying to openmp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 --- Comment #2 from Steven Noonan --- Created attachment 40334 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40334=edit compiled without -fopenmp

[Bug fortran/78757] [7 Regression] ICE with function returning a pointer to a character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug other/78808] target_clones not applying to openmp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 --- Comment #1 from Steven Noonan --- Created attachment 40333 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40333=edit test.c - test case for target_clones with(out) -fopenmp

[Bug other/78808] New: target_clones not applying to openmp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 Bug ID: 78808 Summary: target_clones not applying to openmp functions Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

  1   2   >