[Bug fortran/78867] [7 Regression] GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > This seems to be a regression between revisions r243624 (2016-12-13, > compiles) and r243765 (2016-12-16, ICE with -m32 or -m64). Thanks for quickly

[Bug translation/78745] Truncated messages in po file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745 --- Comment #3 from Frederic Marchal --- One more truncated entry in gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt at line 154.

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #15) > Sorry, I applied your changes manually and did a typo. The line > > SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) = new_reg; > > should be removed. > > I tested this patch

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13) > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #11) > > Created attachment 40372 [details] > > The proposed patch > > Agreed your additions to my change looks

[Bug c/78868] When one variadic function calls another one, the parameters are reversed, if va_arg is used directly in function call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78868 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- It is the call to printf and the order of evaluation of its arguments. That is take: F (g (), h ()); g or h could be called first. The same thing is true here.

[Bug c/78868] When one variadic function calls another one, the parameters are reversed, if va_arg is used directly in function call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78868 --- Comment #3 from Vlad Krasnov --- I though that since va_arg is defined as a macro, it should be evaluated in order.

[Bug c/78868] When one variadic function calls another one, the parameters are reversed, if va_arg is used directly in function call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78868 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note C++17 does specify this more now IIRC.

[Bug c/78868] When one variadic function calls another one, the parameters are reversed, if va_arg is used directly in function call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78868 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78868] New: When one variadic function calls another one, the parameters are reversed, if va_arg is used directly in function call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78868 Bug ID: 78868 Summary: When one variadic function calls another one, the parameters are reversed, if va_arg is used directly in function call. Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78865] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:473

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78867] [7 Regression] GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/78683] [ppc] __builtin_ctzl code gen can be improved for -mcpu=power8 and earlier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78683 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #12) > Created attachment 40373 [details] > fnmatch.i preprocessed source > > With that new LRA patch (plus the previous gcc-pr78516.v2.diff) I get an ICE >

Re: Problem with Factory Generated code g++ 4.x, 5.x, 6.x

On 12/18/2016 12:15 PM, Eduardo Yÿffe1nez via gcc-bugs wrote: >I wish to report a problem with g++ 4.x, g++ 5.x, g++ 6.x. I'm trying >to implement a very classic Factory Method Pattern in C++, I can do it >very easily in MS-Visual C++, but in Linux with g++ the code compiles >but I get

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #11) > Created attachment 40372 [details] > The proposed patch Agreed your additions to my change looks good. However, I'm not so sure about this last hunk: -

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #12 from Joseph S. Myers --- Created attachment 40373 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40373=edit fnmatch.i preprocessed source With that new LRA patch (plus the previous gcc-pr78516.v2.diff) I get an ICE

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov --- Created attachment 40372 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40372=edit The proposed patch

[Bug fortran/78867] New: GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 Bug ID: 78867 Summary: GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8) > where "src" is the subreg:SI ..., so the new_reg mode will be SImode and we > then replace the whole SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) which is the subreg:SI >

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 --- Comment #8 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks.

[Bug middle-end/78047] [5 Regression] Chromium apparently gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78047 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/78047] [5 Regression] Chromium apparently gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78047 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78047] [5 Regression] Chromium apparently gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78047 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Casey at Carter dot net ---

[Bug c++/78841] [6 regression] optimizer bug (silent bad codegen)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78841 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/78841] [6 regression] optimizer bug (silent bad codegen)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78841 --- Comment #5 from Casey Carter --- I have verified that gcc-6-branch compiles the repro correctly, so yes, this is a dup of PR78047.

[Bug c++/78841] [6 regression] optimizer bug (silent bad codegen)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78841 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 --- Comment #7 from Andre Vehreschild --- As you can see from the commit message in comment #3 it hit trunk on 9th of Dezember. Am 19. Dezember 2016 21:03:38 MEZ, schrieb damian at sourceryinstitute dot org :

[Bug c++/78842] "error: declaration of 'bool icase' shadows a parameter" should be warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78842 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2) > Created attachment 40370 [details] > trimmed testcase Isn't this from PR78840 instead?

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 --- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson --- Please let me know which day this hit (or will hit) the trunk. I'm currently using a build dated 20161215.

[Bug fortran/78864] ICE in dtio_procs_present, at fortran/resolve.c:13819

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78864 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug c++/78841] [6 regression] optimizer bug (silent bad codegen)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78841 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78841] [6 regression] optimizer bug (silent bad codegen)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78841 --- Comment #2 from Casey Carter --- Created attachment 40371 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40371=edit compressed preprocessed repro

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) The case that ICEs needs to have an error check in io.c (gfc_resolve_dt). I have found the location and now need to build the error check.

[Bug fortran/78662] [F03] Incorrect parsing of quotes in the char-literal-constant of the DT data descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78662 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78622] [7 Regression] -Wformat-length/-fprintf-return-value incorrect with overflow/wrapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/71473] [5/6/7 Regression] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 Pablo Halpern changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla@halpernwightsoftwa

[Bug c++/78842] "error: declaration of 'bool icase' shadows a parameter" should be warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78842 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/78840] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with const variables in templates implicitly captured by nested lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78840 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Older versions down to at least 5.4.1 give : $ gfortran-7-20161023 -fopenmp -c z1.f90 z1.f90:4:0: !$omp target internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Bug fortran/78866] New: ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 Bug ID: 78866 Summary: ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78865] New: ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:473

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865 Bug ID: 78865 Summary: ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:473 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78864] ICE in dtio_procs_present, at fortran/resolve.c:13819

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78864 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Older versions give : $ gfortran-7-20160828 z1.f90 z1.f90:5:16: namelist /nml/ x 1 Error: NAMELIST object 'x' in namelist 'nml' at (1) is

[Bug fortran/78864] New: ICE in dtio_procs_present, at fortran/resolve.c:13819

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78864 Bug ID: 78864 Summary: ICE in dtio_procs_present, at fortran/resolve.c:13819 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/78751] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (error: unrecognizable insn) w/ -Os -misel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78751 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- In this testcase ifcvt happens upon a branch like: (jump_insn 28 27 65 2 (set (pc) (if_then_else (eq (reg:CCEQ 183) (const_int 0 [0])) (label_ref:SI 65)

[Bug middle-end/71473] [5/6/7 Regression] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org --- __sec_reduce_{min,max}_ind in Intel cilk(tm) plus don't give good performance, so one may suspect they are using size_t.(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > While this started with my

[Bug driver/78863] New: error on -fsanitize suggests invalid -fsanitize=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78863 Bug ID: 78863 Summary: error on -fsanitize suggests invalid -fsanitize=all Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/71473] [5/6/7 Regression] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- While this started with my commit, the actual bug is there from the start of Cilk+ support. The __sec_reduce_* builtins are declared with int return type, which doesn't actual match what they return (it is

[Bug c/70186] RFE: better handling of misspelled attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70186 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01610.html

[Bug c++/78858] [7 Regression] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- While we work toward a resolution it should be possible to avoid the nonnull warnings by using the -fno-sanitize-recover=undefined option.

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #2) > I'm afraid I have too little knowledge of the I/O parts of libgfortran to > fix, but I can at least give some pointers to where things appear to go --- snip --- > if

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/71473] [5/6/7 Regression] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/78862] New: tile*: ICE with -fstack-protetor-strong

572 0x64f64e create_cfi_notes /home/bmg/src/gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2611 0x64f64e execute_dwarf2_frame /home/bmg/src/gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2974 0x64f64e execute /home/bmg/src/gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:3454 Version: gcc version 6.2.1 20161219 [gcc-6-branch revision 243794] (GCC) Other t

[Bug c++/70029] [8 Regression] ICE with C++11 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug libstdc++/78851] Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 --- Comment #6 from Vadim Zeitlin --- > One might complain that it only does this transformation when the second > argument is a constant, not for casts of integer variables to long double. Yes, in the light of new information, this is what

[Bug libstdc++/78851] Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Vadim Zeitlin from comment #4) > Thanks for the explanation! I didn't realize the template function below was > smart enough to select __builtin_powil() automatically, The template selects

[Bug target/78853] aligned reads/writes (vmovdqa) emitted when no such guarantee can be made

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78853 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- See: http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/elf/x86-64-abi-0.99.pdf

[Bug bootstrap/78859] profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78859 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0) > > > There are 2 (so far) errors reported: > > > > > > 1) gengtype.c:

[Bug target/78853] aligned reads/writes (vmovdqa) emitted when no such guarantee can be made

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78853 --- Comment #3 from Pedro Gonnet --- OK, thanks for clarifying! The declaration of __m256i only specifies the attributes vector_size and may_alias (https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/config/i386/avxintrin.h;hb=HEAD#l56), so I'm

[Bug c/32643] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong error message with unsigned char a = uchar&512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/78861] sequencer.cpp:603:53: error: cannot convert 'std::basic_istream::__istream_type {aka std::basic_istream}' to 'bool' in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78861 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/78859] profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78859 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0) > > There are 2 (so far) errors reported: > > > > 1) gengtype.c: > > > > ../../gcc/gengtype.c: In function ‘const

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Janus, Jerry is the expert here. Cheers Paul On 19 December 2016 at 11:59, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >

[Bug c++/78861] New: sequencer.cpp:603:53: error: cannot convert 'std::basic_istream::__istream_type {aka std::basic_istream}' to 'bool' in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78861 Bug ID: 78861 Summary: sequencer.cpp:603:53: error: cannot convert 'std::basic_istream::__istream_type {aka std::basic_istream}' to 'bool' in assignment Product: gcc

[Bug libstdc++/78851] Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 --- Comment #4 from Vadim Zeitlin --- Thanks for the explanation! I didn't realize the template function below was smart enough to select __builtin_powil() automatically, this is quite impressive (although it doesn't happen in my particular

[Bug bootstrap/78859] profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78859 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/78860] ICE in compilation for MIPS with -mpaired-single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78860 niva at niisi dot msk.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Target||MIPS CC|

[Bug target/78860] New: ICE in compilation for MIPS with -mpaired-single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78860 Bug ID: 78860 Summary: ICE in compilation for MIPS with -mpaired-single Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/78858] [7 Regression] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 --- Comment #6 from Marc Mutz --- Ah, I see.

[Bug c++/78858] [7 Regression] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 --- Comment #5 from Marc Mutz --- Created attachment 40368 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40368=edit Another TU that has an unfixable -Wnonnull warning g++ -c -pipe -ffunction-sections -O2 -g -fPIC -std=c++1z

[Bug c++/78858] [7 Regression] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/78858] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp.

/trunk --enable-checking=release --enable-languges=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161219 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug bootstrap/78859] profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78859 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40367 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40367=edit 133.pre dump

[Bug middle-end/30908] tree cost for types which are > WORD_SIZE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30908 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #22 from

[Bug c++/78858] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 --- Comment #2 from Marc Mutz --- Created attachment 40366 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40366=edit Preprocessed source Command line used: g++ -E -pipe -ffunction-sections -O2 -g -fPIC -std=c++1z -fno-exceptions

[Bug bootstrap/78859] profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78859 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40365 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40365=edit 131.crited1 dump

[Bug bootstrap/78859] New: profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78859 Bug ID: 78859 Summary: profiledbootstrap failure caused by -Werror=nonnull Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/65821] [5/6/7 regression] incorrect debug line # info for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- The default arguments are evaluated in the caller even for non-inline functions, for those we can hardly have any DW_AT_inline or DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine just because of the arguments. So, the question

[Bug tree-optimization/78847] pointer arithmetic from c++ ranged-based for loop not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78847 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/71854] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/78839] [6/7 Regression] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/78858] Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78858] New: Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78858 Bug ID: 78858 Summary: Bogus -Wnonnull warning involving strcmp. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/78830] std::prev accepts ForwardIterator-s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78830 --- Comment #4 from Andrzej Krzemienski --- Just to clarify, what I request for this "unconditional" check is not the existence of all operators, but only the check for the iterator_tag (we expect a bidirectional iterator). That is, the problem

[Bug target/78567] [7 Regression] GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c with x32 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567 Marc Mutz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #4 from Marc Mutz ---

[Bug tree-optimization/71854] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-07-13 00:00:00 |2016-12-19 CC|

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic | Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40357|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another starting point could be the fact that DTIO procedures appear to work well on internal units, as long as no namelist output is involved. This case seems to be handled by

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm afraid I have too little knowledge of the I/O parts of libgfortran to fix, but I can at least give some pointers to where things appear to go wrong ... In the function "nml_write_obj" at line

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Dec 19 10:26:04 2016 New Revision: 243794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243794=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-19 Janus Weil PR fortran/78545

[Bug target/78567] [7 Regression] GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c with x32 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/78748] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (s390x-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78748] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (s390x-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Mon Dec 19 09:53:56 2016 New Revision: 243793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243793=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78748: S/390: Fix ICE with ANDC splitter. gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-12-19

[Bug c++/78852] [7 Regression] ICE with Boost.Variant 1.62

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78852 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

  1   2   >