[Bug c++/78898] [7 Regression] ICE: in get_template_base, at cp/pt.c:19665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78898 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78898] New: [7 Regression] ICE: in get_template_base, at cp/pt.c:19665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78898 Bug ID: 78898 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: in get_template_base, at cp/pt.c:19665 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/78894] [c++17] ICE for std::list template deduction from std:: initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78894 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #8 from Yuan Pengfei --- I have sent a patch that fixes this bug. Please review it. Thanks! https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01824.html

[Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 Yuan Pengfei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug c++/78897] New: ICE: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78897 Bug ID: 78897 Summary: ICE: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5019 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78896] New: Segmentation fault occurs when use variable initialized using structured binding with capture-by-ref lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78896 Bug ID: 78896 Summary: Segmentation fault occurs when use variable initialized using structured binding with capture-by-ref lambda Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug bootstrap/78893] gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893 --- Comment #2 from William Bader --- Thanks for the quick reply. The system is a VM. I have the results of 'free' below. The VMs where the build worked all have slightly more memory and swap. What is the recommended minimum to build gcc-6? $

[Bug bootstrap/78893] gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >make[3]: *** [s-attrtab] Killed How much memory do you have on your system? Do you have a swap space? Provide the output of the command "free".

[Bug tree-optimization/78895] New: [6 regression] wrong code with -O1 when setting union twice since 6.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78895 Bug ID: 78895 Summary: [6 regression] wrong code with -O1 when setting union twice since 6.3 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78894] New: [c++17] ICE for std::list template deduction from std:: initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78894 Bug ID: 78894 Summary: [c++17] ICE for std::list template deduction from std:: initializer_list Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/78893] New: gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893 Bug ID: 78893 Summary: gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/72707] [5/6/7 regression] local anonymous union member hides names in the same scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72707 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 22:49:59 2016 New Revision: 243877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243877=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/72707 * name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend_1): Do check

[Bug fortran/78892] New: [7.0 Regression] no type conversion before coarray put

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78892 Bug ID: 78892 Summary: [7.0 Regression] no type conversion before coarray put Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/78826] jump bypasses non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78826 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Jason, do you see any advantage to making this a pedwarn for -std=c++98 That seems to make sense, given that other compilers diagnose it.

[Bug c++/78749] [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member function in anonymous namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78767] [7 Regression] ICE when inheriting constructor of base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78767 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/42329] Deduction of template template argument via base class fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42329 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71724] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- I am using the following, which also fixes the infinite loop, and seems to not regress code quality much at all (I found *one* pattern where it made things one machine insn worse, involving a

[Bug rtl-optimization/78812] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation due to hoisting memory load across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So it's been a long time... And IIRC, rth was the one that fixed this wart in gcse. A BB that ends with a call that can throw or any other abnormal edge is supposed to suppress hoisting for precisely the

[Bug rtl-optimization/78580] [6/7 Regression] Segfault in gcc with multilib (-m32) and -ffixed-*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Dec 21 22:20:11 2016 New Revision: 243875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243875=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-21 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug bootstrap/78817] stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 22:15:59 2016 New Revision: 243874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243874=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/78817 * tree-pass.h (make_pass_post_ipa_warn):

[Bug c++/77829] Bad fix-it for nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77829 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/78656] Fix-it suggestion for std::alocator doesn't include std::allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78656 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/77830] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968, when using constexpr (with testcase)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77830 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 21:58:23 2016 New Revision: 243873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243873=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77830 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): Perform out

[Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Christian Paulsen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/71724] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Maybe we just need to test for that condition, even though it's ugly. However, I think there are some other improvements we could make here. Part of the problem seems to be what if_then_else_cond does on

[Bug rtl-optimization/11488] Pre-regalloc scheduling severely worsens performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 --- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen --- Fixed on powerpc. Testcase times (at 8X original loop count to get measurable times). base: 4.436 sec base + -fno-schedule-insns: 2.052 sec base + patch: 1.815 sec

[Bug c++/42329] Deduction of template template argument via base class fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42329 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Dec 21 19:38:50 2016 New Revision: 243870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243870=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/42329 - deducing base template for template template arg *

[Bug rtl-optimization/11488] Pre-regalloc scheduling severely worsens performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 --- Comment #12 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Wed Dec 21 19:15:32 2016 New Revision: 243866 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243866=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/11488 * common/config/rs6000/rs6000-common.c

[Bug c++/78767] [7 Regression] ICE when inheriting constructor of base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78767 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Dec 21 19:10:23 2016 New Revision: 243864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243864=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78767 - ICE with inherited constructor default argument *

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #19 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Wed Dec 21 19:09:10 2016 New Revision: 243863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243863=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH, v2, rs6000] pr65479 Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables when the

[Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77345] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- It looks very much like PR71724 indeed, but I cannot get this one to fail.

[Bug c/78891] New: Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Bug ID: 78891 Summary: Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/78890] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid reference type in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78749] [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member function in anonymous namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Dec 21 18:28:54 2016 New Revision: 243862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243862=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78749 - friend in anonymous namespace * decl.c

[Bug c++/78890] New: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid reference type in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890 Bug ID: 78890 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid reference type in union Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert --- Just to clarify: 'main' (in the sample program) is just an example. The problems developers are seeing when debugging Emacs almost all involve functions other than 'main'. It should be OK for -Og to optimize

[Bug target/77345] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/78887] [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you attach the preprocessed sources associated with sha1-ce.o ? It should be only one or two files.

[Bug tree-optimization/71518] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/78888] New: toupper(x) can be assumed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Bug ID: 7 Summary: toupper(x) can be assumed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z' Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan Niklas Hasse from comment #6) > According to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html the Boost > License is GPL compatible. So when I mark the code I copied with the source, > it

[Bug target/71321] [6/7 Regression] x86: worse code for uint8_t % 10 and / 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71321 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Wed Dec 21 16:45:33 2016 New Revision: 243861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243861=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71321 * config/i386/i386.md (lea_general_2b,

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #6 from Jan Niklas Hasse --- > Yes. Okay thanks, I'll look into it. > You can't copy any code, that would be a copyright violation. It's OK to see > which Windows API functions Boost uses for a particular filesystem > operation,

[Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 16:16:20 2016 New Revision: 243860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243860=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/78866 * openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses): Diagnose assumed

[Bug target/76731] [AVX512] _mm512_i32gather_epi32 and other scatter/gather routines have incorrect signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731 Andrew Senkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot co

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan Niklas Hasse from comment #4) > Do you mean the part about legal paperwork in > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html ? Yes. > And can I look at how boost::filesystem does this? You can't

[Bug bootstrap/78880] [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/78875] -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78875 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/70936] Hard-coded C++ header paths and relocation problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70936 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-w64-mingw32| Last reconfirmed|2016-05-27

[Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- The return value of malloc is ignored? Your patch looks ok to me, thanks. If it is convenient, you might want to remove the statement, otherwise I expect another pass will handle it later.

[Bug tree-optimization/78887] [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/78887] New: [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 Bug ID: 78887 Summary: [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/78884] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE when |ICE when gimplifying VLA in

[Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/78884] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov --- Not sure how well this qualifies as a regression: prior to 4.9, there was no OpenMP SIMD support, so 4.8 just diagnoses a warning for an unrecognized omp-simd pragma.

[Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/78884] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/78877] Missing suggestion for -fsanitize=addres

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- There's very similar one seen by Jakub in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01765.html $ ./xgcc -B. -fsanitize=nul /tmp/a.c xgcc: error: unrecognized argument to -fsanitize= option: ‘nul’ $

[Bug driver/78863] [6 Regression] error on -fsanitize suggests invalid -fsanitize=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78863 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] error on |[6 Regression] error on

[Bug driver/78863] [6/7 Regression] error on -fsanitize suggests invalid -fsanitize=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78863 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Dec 21 15:05:10 2016 New Revision: 243857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243857=gcc=rev Log: Do not suggest -fsanitize=all (PR driver/78863). PR driver/78863 *

[Bug c/78886] gcc Segmentation fault malloc and volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 --- Comment #1 from George Prekas --- Created attachment 40390 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40390=edit the preprocessed file

[Bug rtl-optimization/78883] [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 40389 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40389=edit .combine dump as requested. Genrated with $ avr-gcc pr26833.c -S -O1 -mmcu=avr4 -S -fdump-rtl-combine-details

[Bug c/78886] New: gcc Segmentation fault malloc and volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Bug ID: 78886 Summary: gcc Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #4 from Jan Niklas Hasse --- > Great! Please read > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/appendix_contributing.html > especially the part about legal paperwork. Do you mean the part about legal paperwork in

[Bug c/78885] gcac checking too slow to be useful ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78885 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Gcac is always collect when ggc_collect is called so yes it will be slow as gc collecting is slow due to having to mark and sweep over huge amounts of memory and there are many calls to ggc_collect now. Each

[Bug c/78885] New: gcac checking too slow to be useful ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78885 Bug ID: 78885 Summary: gcac checking too slow to be useful ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/78807] Loop optimization trigger bus error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78807 --- Comment #3 from Mauritz Sundell --- I did not have access to a Solaris/sparc machine with GCC 6. But on Linux/sparc test program do not crash compiled with GCC 6.2.0. $ uname -a Linux xxx 4.1.12-80.el6uek.sparc64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 30 03:09:10

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It is confirmed, and has been since 2014-12-08. If you look at the dropdown you'll see there is no CONFIRMED status in GCC's bugzilla.

[Bug target/78831] [nvptx] -mgomp -Os init_softstack_frame ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78831 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78831] [nvptx] -mgomp -Os init_softstack_frame ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78831 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov --- Author: amonakov Date: Wed Dec 21 14:20:09 2016 New Revision: 243855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243855=gcc=rev Log: nvptx: do not assume that crtl->is_leaf is unset PR target/78831

[Bug rtl-optimization/78883] [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- Can you please attach a combine dump?

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net --- Shouldn't the status be confirmed?

[Bug c++/78843] error: 'functionname' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78882] std::bind not working with templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78882 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lcid-fire at gmx dot net --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Dec 21 13:50:11 2016 New Revision: 243854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243854=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR testsuite/52641 *

[Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- There's no need to determine the addresses, only the truth of the inequality. The standard says distinct functions have distinct addresses. Yes, linker trickery can break that, but it's reasonable to rely

[Bug c++/78826] jump bypasses non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78826 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #15 from Venkataramanan --- Considering this PR, removing the tuning (splitting of unaligned avx256 loads) for generic is suggested.

[Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #14 from Venkataramanan --- (In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #13) > The question is if the unaligned store is still slow on Excavator and Ryzen > which support AVX2. As far as I understand the bulldozer architectures just >

[Bug sanitizer/77963] inconsistent (false?) leaks detection.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77963 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1) > lsan does not work with ptrace. > There is https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/728 for it. > We don't have plans to fix it, but the change I sent

[Bug libstdc++/71444] Error constants for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on gcc trunk. Assuming no problems show up this is suitable for backporting to the branches, so I'll leave the bug open for now.

[Bug middle-end/78884] New: ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Bug ID: 78884 Summary: ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/78883] New: [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 Bug ID: 78883 Summary: [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/71444] Error constants for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 21 13:09:13 2016 New Revision: 243853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243853=gcc=rev Log: PR 71444 define more error constants for mingw-w64 PR libstdc++/71444

[Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #5) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > > (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #2) > > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > >

[Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #5 from Yuan Pengfei --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #2) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > > See discussion in PR72785. > > > > I am using GCC

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 12:52:06 2016 New Revision: 243851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243851=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77767 * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If *expr is non-NULL,

[Bug ipa/77905] [5/6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in ipa_comdats, at ipa-comdats.c:352)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77905 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 12:49:44 2016 New Revision: 243850 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243850=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-12-13 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #13 from Allan Jensen --- The question is if the unaligned store is still slow on Excavator and Ryzen which support AVX2. As far as I understand the bulldozer architectures just prefer split AVX because it was basically emulating

[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- It seems that this problem not only appears when reading from internal units, but also from std input: module t_m implicit none type, public :: t character(len=:), allocatable ::

[Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #21) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #20) > > *** Bug 78879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > > Kernel bug or not, it

  1   2   3   >