[Bug lto/79061] [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with "AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061 --- Comment #32 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Fri Feb 3 07:17:38 2017 New Revision: 245144 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245144=gcc=rev Log: PR lto/79061 * asan.c (asan_add_global): Force

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [6/7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop --- The data dependence relations are dumped in the output of -fdump-tree-graphite-all. graphite-dependences.c contains the code for the data dependence computations. Looking at the gimple code it seems like a

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:41:44AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 > > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 40661 >

[Bug tree-optimization/79352] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value doesn't handle flexible-like array members properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- Regression tested powerpc64le-linux successfully.

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- That looks good to me. Mike, to you too?

[Bug middle-end/79275] [7 Regression] -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc sysdeps/posix/tempname.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79275] [7 Regression] -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc sysdeps/posix/tempname.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Feb 3 02:18:59 2017 New Revision: 245142 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245142=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/79275 - -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40661 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40661=edit gcc7-pr79354.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looking at tmp-mddump.md, the only other insn that emits the stxssp instruction is movsf_hardfloat and that uses wb constraint for the input_operand and only uses wu constraint for stxsspx, while

[Bug tree-optimization/79327] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -fprintf-return-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79327 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Variant patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00156.html

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps add also foo (); below foo (); to avoid any kind of IPA thinking the memcpy is useless. It is apparently the movsi_from_sf instruction that has this, added by Michael in r244279.

[Bug tree-optimization/79352] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value doesn't handle flexible-like array members properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug target/79343] [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Followup here: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/1078

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40660 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40660=edit Replacement proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/79279] combine/simplify_set: wrong call to REG_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_P

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79279 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79354] New: [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 Bug ID: 79354 Summary: [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79353] New: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79353 Bug ID: 79353 Summary: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-7

[Bug target/69992] test case gcc.dg/sms-4.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69992 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Digging deeper, if i is not 64-bit, we don't choose it as one of the IVs, and the loop iteration test gets converted based on ap instead. Then the math in iv_number_of_iterations decides that it

[Bug testsuite/63256] [5/6/7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-8.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64081] [5/6/7 Regression] r217827 prevents RTL loop unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081 --- Comment #30 from David Edelsohn --- .../src/src/configure --disable-werror --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/cfarm --disable-libstdcxx-pch --with-included-gettext By the way, it's a lot faster if the src and build

[Bug tree-optimization/79352] [6 Regression] -fprintf-return-value doesn't handle flexible-like array members properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/79352] New: [6 Regression] -fprintf-return-value doesn't handle flexible-like array members properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79352 Bug ID: 79352 Summary: [6 Regression] -fprintf-return-value doesn't handle flexible-like array members properly Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/79351] New: Invalid tree PRE optimization around compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351 Bug ID: 79351 Summary: Invalid tree PRE optimization around compound literal Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/79350] New: "explicit" deduction guides don't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79350 Bug ID: 79350 Summary: "explicit" deduction guides don't work Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/79348] abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 --- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt --- Before that the "undesignated symbols" were around already, but the test PASSed anyway.

[Bug middle-end/79349] New: unused std::string is not optimized away in presense of a call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79349 Bug ID: 79349 Summary: unused std::string is not optimized away in presense of a call Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40657|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/79348] abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 --- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt --- The test failure has started with r238647: Move allocator in std::string and RB tree move constructors PR libstdc++/71964 * include/bits/basic_string.h [_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI]

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40657 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40657=edit Potential patch to do the optimization

[Bug target/56828] [PowerPC] Type cast of sNaN value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56828 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/79334] Segfault on tree loop hoisting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79334 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- When you have the tree optimization bug fixed, this becomes an rtl optimization bug since rtl pre does the same as tree pre..

[Bug rtl-optimization/64081] [5/6/7 Regression] r217827 prevents RTL loop unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081 --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez --- > Are there any other particular tricks for bootstrapping GCC circa 219827 on > this AIX? Are there any other configury or otherwise flags? FYI, I also tried --disable-nls as per comment 21, but I get a

[Bug rtl-optimization/64081] [5/6/7 Regression] r217827 prevents RTL loop unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/79343] [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/79348] abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 --- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt --- (Also happend without --enable-shared.)

[Bug middle-end/32003] Undocumented -fdump-tree options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/32003] Undocumented -fdump-tree options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Feb 2 20:57:37 2017 New Revision: 245136 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245136=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/32003 - Undocumented -fdump-tree options gcc/ChangeLog: *

[Bug fortran/65542] [5/6/7 Regression] SPREAD intrinsic incorrectly accepted in initialization expressions with -std=f95

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65542 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 --- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter --- Finally reduced this to something like 260 lines. Problem is the allocate source construct, i.e. copying of allocatable derived type components. module iso_varying_string implicit none integer,

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 --- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 40656 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40656=edit Much reduced problem case

[Bug fortran/65542] [5/6/7 Regression] SPREAD intrinsic incorrectly accepted in initialization expressions with -std=f95

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65542 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 --- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Feb 2 20:22:13 2017 New Revision: 245135 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245135=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/77445 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c: Update

[Bug c++/79300] Wrong diagnostics position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00207.html

[Bug libstdc++/79348] abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 --- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Why have these symbols appeared now? Is TLS enabled by default on this > target now? Did something change regarding TLS? Not that I know of. > Are you using

[Bug libstdc++/79193] libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems reasonable to me, but this area of the configury is not my forte.

[Bug libstdc++/79348] abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/appendix_porting.html#build_hacking.configure.version but you don't want to do that to add new symbols to an old symbol version, that would hide a bug.

[Bug fortran/66089] [6/7 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #21 from Thomas

[Bug libstdc++/79348] abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- How do you regenerate the baseline files for s390*?

[Bug libstdc++/79348] New: abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348 Bug ID: 79348 Summary: abi_check fails on s390x (2 undesignated symbols) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/78348] [7 REGRESSION] 15% performance drop for coremark-pro/nnet-test after r242038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78348 --- Comment #10 from Dominik Vogt --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Author: rguenth > Date: Wed Nov 16 08:42:20 2016 > New Revision: 242470 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242470=gcc=rev > Log: > 2016-11-16 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/78348] [7 REGRESSION] 15% performance drop for coremark-pro/nnet-test after r242038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78348 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug target/78604] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-vectorize-1.c fails starting with r242750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/78604] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-vectorize-1.c fails starting with r242750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|meissner at

[Bug tree-optimization/79347] New: [7 regression] vect_do_peeling is messing up profile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79347 Bug ID: 79347 Summary: [7 regression] vect_do_peeling is messing up profile Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49974] missing warning for indirectly returning reference to local/temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 --- Comment #8 from Szikra --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7) > We currently warn on all the examples involving X, with -O2. We don't for Y, > we might if there was a caller and the dangling reference was used there... Hi, I assume

[Bug other/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt --- For example, use-after-scope-goto-1.c built with -O0 -m31 crashed during exit: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x in ?? () (gdb) up #1 0x77a65c0a in

[Bug middle-end/79275] [7 Regression] -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc sysdeps/posix/tempname.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug libstdc++/60936] [5/6/7 Regression] Binary code bloat with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to __vic from comment #11) > condition_variable.o > cow-stdexcept.o > cow-string-inst.o > eh_throw.o > functexcept.o > functional.o > futex.o > future.o > ios_failure.o > regex.o > stdexcept.o >

[Bug middle-end/78142] Commit r241590 is more registers to be used for on gcc.target/aarch64/vector_initialization_nostack.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78142 --- Comment #6 from tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tnfchris Date: Thu Feb 2 16:35:15 2017 New Revision: 245132 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245132=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78142 *

[Bug other/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt --- No, that does not help. Meanwhile the Tests on s390x have completed (r244119), and there are > 100 Asan related FAILs with -m31 as well as -m64. Not anywhere near your or Andreas' test results. Many FAILs

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #24 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #23) > I filed another PR: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79334 sorry, this was a typo, the correct one is:

[Bug middle-end/78142] Commit r241590 is more registers to be used for on gcc.target/aarch64/vector_initialization_nostack.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78142 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [6/7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Ok, fails with: g++ -floop-nest-optimize -Ofast -w tramp3d-v4.cpp -fdump-tree-graphite-details -$ fdbg-cnt=graphite_scop:4 Problem are following side-by-side loops: [scheduler] original ast: { for (int

[Bug c++/79345] passing yet-uninitialized member as argument to base class constructor should warn (-Wunitialized)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves --- Note, if we add a use of gdb_disassembler::m_stream somewhere, like: gdb_disassembler_test () : gdb_disassembler (verbose == 123 ? _v : _q) // bug here { if (m_stream != _v) abort (); }

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter --- I filed another PR: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79334

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 --- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 40654 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40654=edit This test case now actually produces a segfault.

[Bug preprocessor/79346] New: -Wundef should not warn for standard macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79346 Bug ID: 79346 Summary: -Wundef should not warn for standard macros Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/79345] New: passing yet-uninitialized member as argument to base class constructor should warn (-Wunitialized)

rce Using g++ 7.0.1 20170202 (trunk), compiling this code: == #include struct ui_file {}; ui_file stream_v, stream_q; struct gdb_disassembler { gdb_disassembler (struct ui_file *file) : m_stream (file) {} struct ui_file *m_stream; }; /* Test disassembly of one instruct

[Bug fortran/79344] New: [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 Bug ID: 79344 Summary: [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78439] [7 Regression] error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (arm-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78439 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/79197] [5/6 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > I see SIGILL on >0x3fffb7e722e8 : xscvuxdsp vs32,vs33 > => 0x3fffb7e722ec : stxssp

[Bug fortran/79287] include files not searched for relative to the file containing the fortran include statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79287 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/79287] include files not searched for relative to the file containing the fortran include statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79287 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/79197] [5/6 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- I see SIGILL on 0x3fffb7e722e8 : xscvuxdsp vs32,vs33 => 0x3fffb7e722ec : stxssp v0,0(r31) 0x3fffb7e722f0

[Bug debug/79342] [6 Regression] ICE in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com,

[Bug debug/79342] [6 Regression] ICE in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79342 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Broken by #0 hash_table::expand ( this=0x768a1360) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-6-branch/gcc/hash-table.h:734 #1 0x00c5803e in

[Bug debug/79342] [6 Regression] ICE in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79342 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug debug/79342] [6 Regression] ICE in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/79342] [6 Regression] ICE in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.4

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [6/7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/79343] [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68823] [6/7 Regression][graphite] tramp3d-v4 compiled with -floop-nest-optimize crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79343] [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/79343] [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- The original source is https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/develop/kernel/power/sasum_microk_power8.c Is that invalid for ppc64le (previously, or only now)?

[Bug target/79343] New: [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79343 Bug ID: 79343 Summary: [7 Regression] error: PIC register clobbered by '%2' in 'asm' Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/70578] internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug debug/79342] New: [6 Regression] ICE in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 with -gsplit-dwarf

c-6-branch, at least 20161005 and 20170202, not on 5 and on the trunk. May be related to PR70578. $ g++-6 -std=gnu++11 -c -gsplit-dwarf -g3 -Og -fno-exceptions uvectr64.ii uvectr64.ii:3031:1: internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c:25635 } ^ Please submit a full bug rep

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #39 from Jan Hubicka --- > Finally, the total between after the last and before the first patch. > Overall, > some tests gain some performance and others lose some. The total number of > instructions has grown somewhat (especially

[Bug fortran/79287] include files not searched for relative to the file containing the fortran include statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79287 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug other/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can you: s390*-*-linux*) -if test x$ac_cv_sizeof_void_p = x4; then -UNSUPPORTED=1 -fi in libsanitizer/configure.tgt and retry? As I said on the mailing list, I don't have

[Bug other/79341] New: Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 Bug ID: 79341 Summary: Many Asan tests fail on s390 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug middle-end/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 --- Comment #33 from Dominik Vogt --- I still disagree with reverting the patch. There was plenty of time to identify and fix affected backends instead of doing nothing for half five months and then claiming that the patch is potentially too

[Bug target/79197] [5/6 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at compton dot nu --- Comment #14 from

[Bug middle-end/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 --- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Feb 2 12:39:09 2017 New Revision: 245124 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245124=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78468 * emit-rtl.c (init_emit): Add ??? comment

  1   2   >