[Bug c++/79624] comma separate auto variables deduce different types under dependent lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Or PR 79009 .

[Bug c++/79624] comma separate auto variables deduce different types under dependent lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Or rather a dup of bug 59960.

[Bug c++/79624] comma separate auto variables deduce different types under dependent lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe a dup of bug 78693 which was fixed after 6.3.0.

[Bug c++/79624] New: comma separate auto variables deduce different types under dependent lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79624 Bug ID: 79624 Summary: comma separate auto variables deduce different types under dependent lookup Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/79151] Missed BB vectorization with strided/scalar stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79151 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Another test case. It might even be profitable just to look for divisions, because these are so expensive that packing/unpacking should always be profitable. double foo(double a, double b) { return 1/a +

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 --- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to vehre from comment #6) > Waiting one week for regression reports before closing. All fine with our code. Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug c++/78282] [6 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] Overload |[6 Regression] Overload

[Bug c++/79606] [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79566] [6 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly rejected in range-based for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7 Regression]

[Bug c++/79607] [5/6 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE with |[5/6 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/79400] [7 Regression] Confusing 'noexcept' suggestion on throw (X)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79400 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79470] [7 Regression] "partial specialization is not more specialized" with variadic non-type const& template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79470 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79623] New: error building a cross compiler for powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79623 Bug ID: 79623 Summary: error building a cross compiler for powerpc Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/79500] [7 Regression] [c++1z] non-template deduction guides cause crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79500 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79580] [5/6 Regression] ICE in nested_anon_class_index, at cp/mangle.c:1604

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5/6/7

[Bug c++/79503] [7 Regression] [new inheriting ctors] spurious bad candidate from same or derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79606] [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:06:20 2017 New Revision: 245593 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245593=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79606 - ICE with this->base_member in NSDMI * class.c

[Bug c++/78282] [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:06:39 2017 New Revision: 245594 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245594=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78282 - auto template and pack expansion * pt.c

[Bug c++/79607] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:06:03 2017 New Revision: 245592 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245592=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79607 - ICE with T{} initializer * decl.c

[Bug c++/79566] [6/7 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly rejected in range-based for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:54 2017 New Revision: 245591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245591=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79566 - elaborated-type-specifier in range for * parser.c

[Bug c++/79500] [7 Regression] [c++1z] non-template deduction guides cause crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79500 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:31 2017 New Revision: 245588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245588=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79500 - ICE with non-template deduction guide * pt.c

[Bug c++/79470] [7 Regression] "partial specialization is not more specialized" with variadic non-type const& template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79470 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:38 2017 New Revision: 245589 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245589=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79470 - partial ordering with reference parameters * pt.c

[Bug c++/79580] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in nested_anon_class_index, at cp/mangle.c:1604

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:08 2017 New Revision: 245587 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245587=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79580 - ICE with compound literal * parser.c

[Bug c++/79400] [7 Regression] Confusing 'noexcept' suggestion on throw (X)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79400 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:05:45 2017 New Revision: 245590 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245590=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79400 - confusing suggestion of 'noexcept' * parser.c

[Bug c++/79503] [7 Regression] [new inheriting ctors] spurious bad candidate from same or derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 20 06:03:45 2017 New Revision: 245586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245586=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79503 - inherited ctor taking base class * call.c

[Bug tree-optimization/79622] New: [7 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622 Bug ID: 79622 Summary: [7 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/79621] New: [7 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79621 Bug ID: 79621 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:732 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79620] New: decltype() inside a lambda capturing-by-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79620 Bug ID: 79620 Summary: decltype() inside a lambda capturing-by-value Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/71965] [6/7 regression] [concepts] Substitution error *after* failure to satisfy an earlier constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Sutton --- Hmm... I haven't looked at this in a while. It looks like the expansion of ConstructibleObject is triggering the diagnostic. I'm a little surprised that this gets diagnosed --

[Bug target/79619] store via pointer obtained from alternate address space offset 0 dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79619 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Most likely assuming null pointers are undefined even for non default address spaces.

[Bug target/79619] New: store via pointer obtained from alternate address space offset 0 dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79619 Bug ID: 79619 Summary: store via pointer obtained from alternate address space offset 0 dropped Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug translation/79618] prevent missing space in multiline string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618 --- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --- Furthermore, the space should either be always at the end of the line or always at the beginning of the next line. Currently both variants are used.

[Bug translation/79618] New: prevent missing space in multiline string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618 Bug ID: 79618 Summary: prevent missing space in multiline string literals Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/79614] missing space in diagnostic: the mangled name of the initialization guard variable for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79614 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79611] missing space in diagnostic: placement new constructing an object of type %qT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79611 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79611] missing space in diagnostic: placement new constructing an object of type %qT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79611 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79617] New: missing space in diagnostic: IF clause without modifier at %L used together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79617 Bug ID: 79617 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: IF clause without modifier at %L used together Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/79600] [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/79616] New: missing space in diagnostic: Inlined into %s which now has time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79616 Bug ID: 79616 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: Inlined into %s which now has time Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/79598] ERROR: relocation R_X86_64_32S against symbol can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79598 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/79615] New: missing space in diagnostic: Substring out of bounds: lower bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79615 Bug ID: 79615 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: Substring out of bounds: lower bound Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79614] New: missing space in diagnostic: the mangled name of the initialization guard variable for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79614 Bug ID: 79614 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: the mangled name of the initialization guard variable for Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/79613] New: missing space in diagnostic: GLOBAL CONST-PROP: Replacing reg %d in jump_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79613 Bug ID: 79613 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: GLOBAL CONST-PROP: Replacing reg %d in jump_insn Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/79612] New: missing space in diagnostic: Incorrect rank of return array in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79612 Bug ID: 79612 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: Incorrect rank of return array in Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79611] New: missing space in diagnostic: placement new constructing an object of type %qT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79611 Bug ID: 79611 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: placement new constructing an object of type %qT Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/79610] New: missing space in diagnostic: %qD must be a global variable in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79610 Bug ID: 79610 Summary: missing space in diagnostic: %qD must be a global variable in Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/79609] C address space qualifiers not available under -fno-asm, even for system headers and __extension__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79609 --- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org --- Note Clang uses __attribute__((address_space(N))) for this. That automagically handles the parsing issues in a well-known fashion, and gets C++ support for free to boot. Unfortunately they use

[Bug c++/78282] [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79600] [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600 --- Comment #5 from smalcom --- Second error string... I'm stupid. Thanks for help. So, old compilers just kinder?

[Bug c/79609] New: C address space qualifiers not available under -fno-asm, even for system headers and __extension__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79609 Bug ID: 79609 Summary: C address space qualifiers not available under -fno-asm, even for system headers and __extension__ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/79606] [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/79607] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/79608] New: missing space in error message "bepositive"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79608 Bug ID: 79608 Summary: missing space in error message "bepositive" Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/79593] [Regression] Poor/Worse code generation for FPU on versions after 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/79600] [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your code is invalid, the initializer for an enumerator must be a constant expression and you can't use reinterpret_cast in a constant expression.

[Bug c++/79606] [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79607] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79535] [6/7 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79535 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/71965] [6/7 regression] [concepts] Substitution error *after* failure to satisfy an earlier constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Hm? > > same sorry with GCC 6.2 for me. The r238558 change has been backported to 6.x branch in r238577.

[Bug c++/71965] [6/7 regression] [concepts] Substitution error *after* failure to satisfy an earlier constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/79607] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607 --- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt --- This might be related to PR79535.

[Bug c++/79607] New: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79607 Bug ID: 79607 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with brace-initialization of static const member Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/79566] [6/7 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly rejected in range-based for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79400] [7 Regression] Confusing 'noexcept' suggestion on throw (X)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79400 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/79380] ICE on C++11 code with illegal alignas specifier on x86_64-linux-gnu: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79380 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79470] [7 Regression] "partial specialization is not more specialized" with variadic non-type const& template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79470 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/79606] New: [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79606 Bug ID: 79606 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer in template Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/79500] [7 Regression] [c++1z] non-template deduction guides cause crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79500 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/79580] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in nested_anon_class_index, at cp/mangle.c:1604

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2017-02-17

[Bug libstdc++/68739] FAIL: 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-02-18, at 1:51 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739 > > --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Oh, (void*)1 works, it's only

[Bug target/71017] libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:346:17: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > It should be fixed now. Closing. > > I forgot to commit the fix to the 5 branch, done now. I also noticed that > the same problem occurs with > >

[Bug c++/79503] [7 Regression] [new inheriting ctors] spurious bad candidate from same or derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/79605] New: attribute [[noreturn]] accepted in explicit instantiation directives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79605 Bug ID: 79605 Summary: attribute [[noreturn]] accepted in explicit instantiation directives Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79604] New: attribute noreturn inconsistent between C and C++, undocumented for function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79604 Bug ID: 79604 Summary: attribute noreturn inconsistent between C and C++, undocumented for function pointers Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/79603] New: make diagnostics more i18n-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79603 Bug ID: 79603 Summary: make diagnostics more i18n-friendly Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/79602] New: translation: globally replace '%s' with %qs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602 Bug ID: 79602 Summary: translation: globally replace '%s' with %qs Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/79601] New: Possibly wrong use of keyword "intent" in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79601 Bug ID: 79601 Summary: Possibly wrong use of keyword "intent" in diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/79600] [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600 --- Comment #3 from smalcom --- Created attachment 40777 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40777=edit ii from 7.0.1

[Bug c++/79600] [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600 --- Comment #2 from smalcom --- Created attachment 40776 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40776=edit ii from 6.3.0

[Bug c++/79600] [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79600 --- Comment #1 from smalcom --- Created attachment 40775 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40775=edit ii from 4.9.4

[Bug c++/79600] New: [c++11] reinterpret_cast not working in enum class

r avr-gcc-7.0.1-20170219 - compilation error I'll attach *.ii files for every gcc version. Build string: avr-g++ -save-temps -std=c++11 -Wall -Os -pedantic -mmcu=atxmega128a3u -c 1.cpp -o 1.o && avr-g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -Os -mmcu=atxmega128a3u 1.o -o 1 Information about compilers 1. Usi

[Bug fortran/79599] New: typo in diagnostic gfc_error ("DTIO dummy argument at %L be a scalar"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79599 Bug ID: 79599 Summary: typo in diagnostic gfc_error ("DTIO dummy argument at %L be a scalar" Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 19 19:59:20 2017 New Revision: 245582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245582=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/79447 *

[Bug c++/79598] New: ERROR: relocation R_X86_64_32S against symbol can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79598 Bug ID: 79598 Summary: ERROR: relocation R_X86_64_32S against symbol can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/79597] New: Incomplete error message "Expecting %

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79597 Bug ID: 79597 Summary: Incomplete error message "Expecting % " "at %C, ", s1); There is a trailing comma. In the corresponding "else" clause, there is a complete sentence. One of these is

[Bug fortran/79596] New: translation: argument to gfc_internal_error should not be translated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79596 Bug ID: 79596 Summary: translation: argument to gfc_internal_error should not be translated Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79595] New: Inconsistent grammar in diagnostic "partial specialization %q+D does not specialize"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79595 Bug ID: 79595 Summary: Inconsistent grammar in diagnostic "partial specialization %q+D does not specialize" Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 19 18:43:49 2017 New Revision: 245581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245581=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-02-19 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/79402] ICE with submodules: module procedure interface defined in parent module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79402 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 19 18:27:14 2017 New Revision: 245580 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245580=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/79402 *

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 19 18:18:33 2017 New Revision: 245579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245579=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-19 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug c++/79380] ICE on C++11 code with illegal alignas specifier on x86_64-linux-gnu: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79380 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Feb 19 17:43:41 2017 New Revision: 245578 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245578=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-02-19 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/71017] libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:346:17: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/71017] libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:346:17: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017 --- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Feb 19 16:12:34 2017 New Revision: 245576 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245576=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-19 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Sun Feb 19 14:13:53 2017 New Revision: 245574 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245574=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69523 make -Wliteral-suffix control warning gcc: PR c++/69523

[Bug tree-optimization/79594] New: -Waggressive-loop-optimizations incomplete and/or inconsistentt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79594 Bug ID: 79594 Summary: -Waggressive-loop-optimizations incomplete and/or inconsistentt Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal