[Bug middle-end/80422] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80422 Bug ID: 80422 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in operator[], at vec.h:732 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/74563] [6/7 regression] Classic MIPS16 (non-MIPS16e) function return broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563 --- Comment #6 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Created attachment 41199 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41199=edit Possible fix FYI, I think this has been caused by r227385, see how `_internal' is used by

[Bug target/74563] [6/7 regression] Classic MIPS16 (non-MIPS16e) function return broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/68397] std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68397 --- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> --- Created attachment 41198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41198=edit Testing a patch... I'm testing the following: 2017-04-13 Edward Smith-Rowland

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry Babokin --- I confirm that the latest patch fixes all UBSAN compile time problems that I have. Thanks! Though correctness issues remain - PR80386.

[Bug c/80421] Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Johnson --- GCC seems to be dispatching to the wrong case in a switch-statement in the attached source. To see the problem, examine the first function in the attached C file, which is copied below: uint32_t

[Bug c/80421] Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Johnson --- Created attachment 41197 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41197=edit Preprocessor output

[Bug c/80421] New: Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 Bug ID: 80421 Summary: Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/71951] libgcc_s built with -fomit-frame-pointer on aarch64 is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71951 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug c++/80415] [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80415 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/80357] [7 Regression] ICE in model_update_limit_points_in_group, at haifa-sched.c:1982 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yes exactly. When pressure is removed the reg is on the reg_use_list eight times, but when pressure was added it was just once.

[Bug fortran/80388] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Apr 13 19:52:58 2017 New Revision: 246917 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246917=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80403 * fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Revert

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > > > It does for me provided the patch is applied at the proper location: > > > > > > @@ -2657,6 +2657,12 @@ gfc_match_structure_constructor (gfc_sym > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/80357] [7 Regression] ICE in model_update_limit_points_in_group, at haifa-sched.c:1982 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/80420] missing -Wformat-overfow on snprintf with excessive bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80420 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/80420] New: missing -Wformat-overfow on snprintf with excessive bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80420 Bug ID: 80420 Summary: missing -Wformat-overfow on snprintf with excessive bound Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/80343] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 (error: insn does not satisfy its constraints)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/80343] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 (error: insn does not satisfy its constraints)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80343 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Apr 13 18:08:51 2017 New Revision: 246914 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246914=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-13 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug middle-end/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- I actually think that for the test case in comment #4, the warning does highlight a problem in the code: since the test (p < c) can never be true the memset can never be called in a valid program. At -O2 the

[Bug libfortran/67540] string_intrinsics_inc.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67540 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Actually, the null pointer str4 is dereferenced four times: > at lines 39, 40, 68, 69. I agree for lines 39 and 68, but in lines it points to the strings 'ABCDEFGH' and 4_'ABCDEFGH' AFAIU

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71778] [6/7 Regression][ARM] ICE using non-constant argument to Neon intrinsic that requires constant arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71778 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/67540] string_intrinsics_inc.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67540 --- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca --- Actually, the null pointer str4 is dereferenced four times: at lines 39, 40, 68, 69.

[Bug gcov-profile/71672] inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71672 --- Comment #2 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:15:26PM +, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71672 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug sanitizer/79265] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- I expect the instrumentation for local arrays is going to behind the majority of the complaints for sprintf, like the calls in f0, f1, and f2 (and other nonnull functions). Local arrays are never allocated

[Bug gcov-profile/51975] ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with fprofile-use when source changes from fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/74563] [6/7 regression] Classic MIPS16 (non-MIPS16e) function return broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I haven't looked at this the dumps for this failure, but I've just narrowed down a very similar looking issue. I've got a case where hard register propagation replaces the use of $2 with $sp in a load in

[Bug sanitizer/80414] [UBSAN] segfault with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80414 --- Comment #1 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Thu Apr 13 14:52:23 2017 New Revision: 246909 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246909=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80414 * ubsan.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/80343] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 (error: insn does not satisfy its constraints)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80343 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've reproduced it. It is a combination of scratches with rematerialization. I guess it will be fixed in a few days.

[Bug gcov-profile/80223] RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/80031] gcno files contain BB flags that are not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80031 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2017-04-13

[Bug gcov-profile/80031] gcno files contain BB flags that are not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80031 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/71672] inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71672 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/79392] MinGW-w64 backend: programs built with --coverage do not create *.gcda files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79392 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug gcov-profile/47358] Decimal number formatting not localized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47358 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41195 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41195=edit gcc7-pr80403-2.patch Oops, thinko in the committed patch. COND_EXPR/VEC_COND_EXPR op0's type doesn't have to be the

[Bug gcov-profile/78783] gcov-tool fails in gcov_read_counter_mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78783 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/78783] gcov-tool fails in gcov_read_counter_mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78783 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41194 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41194=edit Untested patch

[Bug gcov-profile/78783] gcov-tool fails in gcov_read_counter_mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78783 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška

[Bug c/80419] New: rpmbuild with rpmrc file crashed httpd rebuild

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80419 Bug ID: 80419 Summary: rpmbuild with rpmrc file crashed httpd rebuild Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: http://https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/80388] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This has been fixed by revision r230580 (pr59910). If there is no objection, I can back port the fix to the gcc5 branch.

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > It does for me provided the patch is applied at the proper location: > > > > @@ -2657,6 +2657,12 @@ gfc_match_structure_constructor (gfc_sym > > > > Applying the patch with patch -p0 -i

[Bug libfortran/67540] string_intrinsics_inc.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67540 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This test case is wrong. Well, I don't if strings comparison is allowed or forbidden by the standard when one string is a non-associated pointer as in program test implicit none call

[Bug ada/80418] libgnat_pic.a built but not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80418 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/35038] GCOV - using "--coverage" results in libgcov.a(_gcov.o) is referenced by DSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35038 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/53414] gcov does not generate 'Lines' record for final block of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53414 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/59735] code coverage options generate corrupted gcno file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59735 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/53915] gcov can call format_gcov with top > bottom, which is unexpected and gives 99.99%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug gcov-profile/60321] compiler error: in gcov_open, at gcov-io.c:82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60321 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/67924] Gcov statistics branches error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67924 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70427] autofdo bootstrap generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70427 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/80413] sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in gcov-io.c using -ftest-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80413 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Known to fail|

[Bug gcov-profile/80413] sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in gcov-io.c using -ftest-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80413 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Apr 13 11:51:28 2017 New Revision: 246903 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246903=gcc=rev Log: Do not call memcpy with a NULL argument (PR gcov-profile/80413). 2017-04-13

[Bug testsuite/80416] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80416 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/80418] New: libgnat_pic.a built but not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80418 Bug ID: 80418 Summary: libgnat_pic.a built but not installed Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug target/79712] Clang smarter about unrolling in fhourstones benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79712 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/80416] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80416 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Apr 13 11:17:38 2017 New Revision: 246902 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246902=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-13 Richard Biener PR testsuite/80416

[Bug c++/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] Using|[5/6 Regression] Using lto

[Bug sanitizer/79265] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- There are two major reasons for the forcing of -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks by the null pointer sanitizers. One is to avoid relying too much on UB assumptions, where the optimizers say that something

[Bug debug/80321] [7 regression] infinite recursion with inlining of nested function and debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80321 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [6 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 Bug 79255 depends on bug 80321, which changed state. Bug 80321 Summary: [7 regression] infinite recursion with inlining of nested function and debug info https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80321 What|Removed

[Bug debug/80321] [7 regression] infinite recursion with inlining of nested function and debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80321 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Apr 13 11:05:09 2017 New Revision: 246900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246900=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/80321 * dwarf2out.c (decls_for_scope): Ignore declarations

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > One another observation, working sets are wrong as they do not respect # of > runs: > > 1 run: > threshold = 1, sum_all=190579 > > 10 tuns: > threshold = 10,

[Bug testsuite/80416] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80416 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- or better asm volatile ("" : "=r" (q) : "0" (q));

[Bug testsuite/80416] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80416 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/80416] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80416 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #24) > Actually, the volatile attribute conflicts with the intent(in) of the final > variable. But making the function result variable 'integral' volatile, does > the

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- One another observation, working sets are wrong as they do not respect # of runs: 1 run: threshold = 1, sum_all=190579 10 tuns: threshold = 10, sum_all=1905790

[Bug c++/80417] New: GCC does not accept a well-formed code of using declaration with pack expansion results inheriting constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80417 Bug ID: 80417 Summary: GCC does not accept a well-formed code of using declaration with pack expansion results inheriting constructor Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/80416] New: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80416 Bug ID: 80416 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr79671.C -O2 execution test Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/79265] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Btw, for targets which default to -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks nonnull sanitizing is of course pointless. I think we should simply make sure to instrument early enough before things are folded... or

[Bug gcov-profile/80413] sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in gcov-io.c using -ftest-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80413 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch in testing.

[Bug sanitizer/79265] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code

[Bug sanitizer/70878] [5/6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70878 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/69953] [5/6/7 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 --- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Apr 13 08:04:52 2017 New Revision: 246899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246899=gcc=rev Log: PR lto/69953 * ipa-visibility.c (non_local_p): Fix typos.

[Bug c++/80415] [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80415 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #32 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #30) > I didn't close it because I wanted to see updated benchmark numbers. Either > I'll grab the benchmark, or if somebody else posts the latest numbers, we > can

[Bug other/79703] [meta-bug] SciMark 2.0 performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79703 Bug 79703 depends on bug 79390, which changed state. Bug 79390 Summary: [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80415] [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80415 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/79935] DJGPP: misaligned stack in static constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79935 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andris.pavenis at iki dot fi ---

[Bug c++/80415] New: [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80415 Bug ID: 80415 Summary: [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: