Vaughan, Hillary L.

See the attached payment report. Passwd is rg5TQaDh0CRz You have to type it to be able to open the attached file. Waiting for your reply Vaughan, Hillary L. k47k-7i.z4kc38.docx Description: Attached file: k47k-7i.z4kc38.docx

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9) > > > > It's possible that the path is not reachable and GCC doesn't see it. > > Well, 18 exabytes allocations

[Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.4 |8.0

[Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug rtl-optimization/77770] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error on source which compiles with earlier versions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0 Summary|[7 regression]

[Bug target/80377] gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mavx512’; did you mean ‘-mavx512 ’?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80377 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- No idea. Looking at both trunk and the gcc 6 branch I see various options that begin with "mavx512", but there isn't a plain "mavx512" option - they all have some kind of additional suffix. I don't think

[Bug middle-end/70831] [6/7 Regression] FTBFS: Build fails with bootstrap-lto and profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70831 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/80451] [6/7 Regression] return implicit type conversion to std::experimental::optional does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/80464] [7 regression] S/390: ICE failed to split vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80464 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/80392] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable polymorphic function result in a procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80392 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/80451] [6/7 Regression] return implicit type conversion to std::experimental::optional does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug rtl-optimization/80463] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -fselective-scheduling2 and -fvar-tracking-assignments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug target/80464] [7 regression] S/390: ICE failed to split vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80464 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug debug/80453] [7 Regression] another compare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug target/80175] rs6000 target should have a strlensi pattern that works for recent powerpc processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80175 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80449] [7 Regression] ICE reporting failed partial class template specialization class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80449 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/80465] [7 Regression] ICE when evaluating a lamba noexcept spec with captures in C++1z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80465 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [6 Regression] wrong manipulation of range based on INT_MIN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7 Regression] wrong|[6 Regression] wrong

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [7 Regression] wrong manipulation of range based on INT_MIN

(extract_range_from_binary_expr_1): For an additive operation on symbolic operands, also compute the overflow for the invariant part when the operation degenerates into a negation. PR tree-optimization/80426 * gcc.c-torture/execute/20170419-1.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/80467] New: Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 Bug ID: 80467 Summary: Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/80466] New: template<> using loses template argument in debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80466 Bug ID: 80466 Summary: template<> using loses template argument in debuginfo Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/77661] [7 Regression] --enable-maintainer-mode causes in-tree-build of MPC to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80465] [7 Regression] ICE when evaluating a lamba noexcept spec with captures in C++1z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80465 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/77661] [7 Regression] --enable-maintainer-mode causes in-tree-build of MPC to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Apr 19 18:49:29 2017 New Revision: 247006 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247006=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-19 Thomas Koenig Tobias Burnus

[Bug tree-optimization/79534] [7 Regression] tree-ifcombine aarch64 performance regression with trunk@245151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534 --- Comment #9 from Brian Rzycki --- Hello James, If this is working as designed this may just be a case of having to live with the regression. Do we know if anyone analyzed the net-benefit of Honza's patch? If more benchmarks/tests win then I

[Bug c++/38172] warn_unused_result does not work with structs not containing a copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172 --- Comment #14 from Matthew Dennis --- I believe `nodiscard` is only valid in C++17

[Bug c++/80465] New: [7 Regression] ICE when evaluating a lamba noexcept spec with captures in C++1z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80465 Bug ID: 80465 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE when evaluating a lamba noexcept spec with captures in C++1z Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/77661] [7 Regression] --enable-maintainer-mode causes in-tree-build of MPC to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #61 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #60) > r242780 works. > > With both r243586 and r244391, plus the patch for r245191 > applied, I got numerous failures in the test suite. > > Apparently, something

[Bug bootstrap/77661] [7 Regression] --enable-maintainer-mode causes in-tree-build of MPC to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/79534] [7 Regression] tree-ifcombine aarch64 performance regression with trunk@245151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534 --- Comment #8 from James Greenhalgh --- In the case before Honza's patch, corrupt profile information leads to a branch being marked as 100% taken. After Honza's patch, the branch is instead seen with 95.6% taken: (jump_insn 1916 1915 1922 309

[Bug tree-optimization/66278] Missed auto-vectorization of an array subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > (In reply to amker from comment #5) > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > > > Greating, starting from r238586 the test-case is vectorized.

[Bug tree-optimization/66278] Missed auto-vectorization of an array subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to amker from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > > Greating, starting from r238586 the test-case is vectorized. Bin should I > > create a test-case from this, or do you have

[Bug target/80377] gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mavx512’; did you mean ‘-mavx512 ’?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80377 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > Likewise, I tried but failed to reproduce it. > > A hunch: given the "-march=native", is there a chance that this bug is > dependent on the precise CPU flags

[Bug c++/80460] Incorrect fallthrough warning after [[noreturn]] function inside always-true conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80460 --- Comment #7 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > The warning is done before optimizations (except GENERIC opts), and can > hardly be done much later. I imagined it would be the case. Treat this as low

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #60 from Thomas Koenig --- r242780 works. With both r243586 and r244391, plus the patch for r245191 applied, I got numerous failures in the test suite. Apparently, something else was wrong for some time, which blocks the attempt at

[Bug middle-end/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/80461] [7 Regression] ICE in modified_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:12566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80461 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/80436] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80436 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80459] [7 regression] c-c++-common/opaque-vector.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/80461] [7 Regression] ICE in modified_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:12566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80461 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 19 16:32:02 2017 New Revision: 247002 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247002=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/80461 * dwarf2out.c (modified_type_die,

[Bug c++/80459] [7 regression] c-c++-common/opaque-vector.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80459 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 19 16:31:11 2017 New Revision: 247001 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247001=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80459 * c-c++-common/opaque-vector.c (SIZEOF_MAXINT):

[Bug debug/80436] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80436 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 19 16:29:45 2017 New Revision: 247000 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247000=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/80436 * tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (find_uses_to_rename_def):

[Bug debug/80453] [7 Regression] another compare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, for the #c0 testcase with r246965 reverted on x86_64-linux, the ugly thing is that -fdump-tree-all makes the -fcompare-debug failure go away, but trying individual -fdump-tree-* usually works. The

[Bug fortran/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Component|middle-end

[Bug tree-optimization/66278] Missed auto-vectorization of an array subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/80464] [7 regression] S/390: ICE failed to split vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80464 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 41230 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41230=edit Experimental patch The problem was introduced with the arch12 patchset.

[Bug target/80464] [7 regression] S/390: ICE failed to split vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80464 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Target||s390x-ibm-linux

[Bug rtl-optimization/77770] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error on source which compiles with earlier versions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/80464] New: [7 regression] S/390: ICE failed to split vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80464 Bug ID: 80464 Summary: [7 regression] S/390: ICE failed to split vector move Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aivchenk at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/66278] Missed auto-vectorization of an array subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com Known

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov --- Perhaps it's a good idea to adjust libmpx/configure.tgt to build libmpx only for Glibc by default? I'm not sure if there's a particular reason that current code accepts any suffix in the triple. diff

[Bug debug/80453] [7 Regression] another compare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 41228 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41228=edit another unreduced testcase

[Bug bootstrap/69725] LTO/PGO bootstrap fails with in-tree gmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #16) > If there's no way to make profiledbootstrap work with in-tree GMP (or other > prerequisites) then it would be most helpful to change the configure script > to

[Bug debug/80453] [7 Regression] another compare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > > It was "fixed" by r246965, which doesn't make much sense. On the other hand r246965 "causes" a new heisenbug on ppc64le: %

[Bug gcov-profile/78792] gfortran + gcov confused by #line directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78792 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I'm unable to feed Fortran FE with a pre-processed file: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-04/msg00072.html

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/69725] LTO/PGO bootstrap fails with in-tree gmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- If there's no way to make profiledbootstrap work with in-tree GMP (or other prerequisites) then it would be most helpful to change the configure script to detect it and error out early with a descriptive

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 --- Comment #6 from vicencb at gmail dot com --- Yes, the host (and build) system uses glibc, target system uses musl. Thanks for the fix! Should I test it or you already did?

[Bug c++/80456] calling constexpr member function from volatile-qualified member function: error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80456 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- With the volatile, cxx_eval_constant_expression sees *(volatile struct A *) this;, A::test(); and it's not able to evaluate 'this' in it. Without the volatile it only sees A::test() which it can evaluate.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried to reproduce natively on power using the same revision where Mike was seeing failures but I didn't see any problems. He was doing an x86->power cross compiler though.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- There was some dispute about whether it was fixed. Mike, can you still reproduce the problem?

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška

[Bug debug/80461] [7 Regression] ICE in modified_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:12566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80461 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- It's hard to believe that GCC doesn't crash on that test case before 245039, too.

[Bug debug/80453] [7 Regression] another compare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > While I could reproduce this yesterday on x86_64-linux (but only with > bootstrapped gcc), I can't reproduce this anymore today. My tree includes > the

[Bug c++/80460] Incorrect fallthrough warning after [[noreturn]] function inside always-true conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80460 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- But even that is not enough for switch (i) { case 0: goto X; if (0) // nowarn X: nop (); else die (); case 1:; i++; } because we need to

[Bug other/51732] typo in man gcc: "runt-time check"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51732 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Guy from comment #2) > :D :D > > Reminds me of the first edition of a Gutenberg text for Shakespeare which, > due to an unfortunate OCR mismatch which also passed the spelling check, had

[Bug c++/80460] Incorrect fallthrough warning after [[noreturn]] function inside always-true conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80460 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Actually, nothing I imagined wouldn't work for the case when the else branch is dead :(. A patch that helps with bogus warning for dead then branches: --- a/gcc/gimplify.c +++ b/gcc/gimplify.c @@ -1912,6

[Bug debug/80453] [7 Regression] another compare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- While I could reproduce this yesterday on x86_64-linux (but only with bootstrapped gcc), I can't reproduce this anymore today. My tree includes the PR80436 fix, but it doesn't seem that changed spot is ever

[Bug middle-end/70773] Profiled sudoku solver slower due to lack of sdiv/udiv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/80463] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -fselective-scheduling2 and -fvar-tracking-assignments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/51732] typo in man gcc: "runt-time check"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51732 --- Comment #2 from Martin Guy --- :D :D Reminds me of the first edition of a Gutenberg text for Shakespeare which, due to an unfortunate OCR mismatch which also passed the spelling check, had "He held the babe in his anus" for several years.

[Bug target/80377] gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mavx512’; did you mean ‘-mavx512 ’?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80377 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Likewise, I tried but failed to reproduce it. A hunch: given the "-march=native", is there a chance that this bug is dependent on the precise CPU flags on the host?

[Bug target/80462] [avr] Incorrect "warning: uninitialized variable 'xxx' put into program memory area" for identical strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80462 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80462] [avr] Incorrect "warning: uninitialized variable 'xxx' put into program memory area" for identical strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80462 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Apr 19 12:22:59 2017 New Revision: 246998 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246998=gcc=rev Log: Backport from 2017-04-19 trunk r246997. PR target/80462 *

[Bug target/80462] [avr] Incorrect "warning: uninitialized variable 'xxx' put into program memory area" for identical strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80462 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Apr 19 12:20:57 2017 New Revision: 246997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246997=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80462 * config/avr/avr.c (tree.h): Include it.

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #59 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #58) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #57) > > And here comes the first problem... > > > > Running with rev 243584 (as a bisection) results in > > very

[Bug middle-end/80270] ICE in extract_bit_field_1 at gcc/expmed.c:1798

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80270 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Ivchenko --- Another test that fails similarly, but already at "-O0": typedef int v8 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8))); struct S2 { v8 s2f2; int* f3; }; int foo (int i) { register struct S2 b asm ("xmm0");

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #58 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #57) > And here comes the first problem... > > Running with rev 243584 (as a bisection) results in > very many failed tests like *** Error in

[Bug ipa/65972] ICE after applying a patch to enable verify_ssa with auto-pgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65972 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0.1 Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/65972] ICE after applying a patch to enable verify_ssa with auto-pgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65972 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Apr 19 12:06:35 2017 New Revision: 246996 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246996=gcc=rev Log: Update SSA after AutoPGO early inlining (PR ipa/65972). 2017-04-19 Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/80463] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fselective-scheduling2 and -fvar-tracking-assignments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463 --- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Not sure which pass should be responsible for this. The test uses un-initialized variable e, which could cause undefined behavior? Also if I change the test into: int *a; int b, c; void d () {

[Bug lto/50345] Incomplete GCC Internals sentence on LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #57 from Thomas Koenig --- And here comes the first problem... Running with rev 243584 (as a bisection) results in very many failed tests like

[Bug c++/80460] Incorrect fallthrough warning after [[noreturn]] function inside always-true conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80460 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/50345] Incomplete GCC Internals sentence on LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Apr 19 12:00:47 2017 New Revision: 246995 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246995=gcc=rev Log: Fix typo in LTO documentation (PR lto/50345). 2017-04-19 Paulo J. Matos

[Bug sanitizer/55799] AddressSanitizer with `-pg' option results in spurious errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #56 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #55) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #52) > > I tried again to make a more reduced test case, but I couldn't really > > separate it from library structure

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 --- Comment #4 from vicencb at gmail dot com --- I can confirm that with the provided list of steps it is still reproducible. To obtain the buildroot version use this: cd /tmp git clone git://git.buildroot.net/buildroot cd buildroot git

[Bug debug/80461] [7 Regression] ICE in modified_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:12566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80461 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41227 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41227=edit gcc7-pr80461.patch Untested fix.

[Bug sanitizer/55506] gcc.dg/cleanup-{10,11,8,9}.c execution test failures with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55506 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/55509] gcc.dg/torture/matrix-6.c failures with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55509 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/55519] [asan] False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55519 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/55661] options summary lists -fsanitize in wrong section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55661 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/51732] typo in man gcc: "runt-time check"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51732 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/53925] dbgcnt.c:dbg_cnt_set_limit_by_index emits diagnostic via fprintf (stderr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53925 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/80461] [7 Regression] ICE in modified_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:12566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80461 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

  1   2   >