https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80977
Bug ID: 80977
Summary: uniform_int_distribution downscaling throws away
perfectly good entropy
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
Well, I should be more careful -- the behavior you see is probably reasonable
for these runtime tests, since the testing infrastructure isn't aware that you
built for an older architecture on the POWER8 it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to rdapp from comment #9)
> > Therefore, whenever the vector tests are run on a power8 CPU,
> TARGET_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_VSX = 1, no matter the --with-cpu. This would
> also explain why I didn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #22)
> The warning on the test case in comment #21 looks good to me. Thanks!
>
> From reading comment #1 I'm not sure your patch does quite what you
> described there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor ---
The warning on the test case in comment #21 looks good to me. Thanks!
>From reading comment #1 I'm not sure your patch does quite what you described
there. It doesn't warn on the declaration of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80976
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 41469
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41469=edit
Attempt at straightforward patch
This one looks rather straightforward. I'll be testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Restricted to the library version, the inline
version is OK:
ig25@linux-d6cw:~/Krempel/MMZero> cat t1.f90
program bogus_matmul
implicit none
real :: M(3,0), v(0), w(3)
w = 7
w = matmul(M,v)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80976
Bug ID: 80976
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/Wfloat-conversion.c -std=gnu++98
(test for warnings, line 42)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170604 (experimental) [trunk revision 248860
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
Bug ID: 80975
Summary: [7 Regression] matmul for zero-length arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80973
Bug ID: 80973
Summary: ICE with lambda and -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80972
Bug ID: 80972
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with alignas and
__attribute__((packed))
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80971
Bug ID: 80971
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with 'if constexpr' in template
function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80919
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sun Jun 4 17:27:22 2017
New Revision: 248860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248860=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/80919
* c-format.c (matching_type_p): Return false if any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970
Bug ID: 80970
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error in
find_reloads, at reload.c:4077
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
URL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2017-6-4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Bug ID: 80969
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at
config/i386/i386.c:14606
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54720
--- Comment #4 from Keith Marshall ---
Created attachment 41468
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41468=edit
Make install-strip work for libobjc
FWIW, I've applied the attached patch, for the MinGW.org binary distribution of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #34 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31)
> When I tried the workaround, I got
>
> /var/gcc/regression/trunk/10.7-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80964
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I think this would do what you want:
Not building gotools for build==host!=target,
but build the gotools for build!=host==target (canadian),
At least the gotools are built without error in the
latter case,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80964
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
with --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf I see this in gotools
config.log:NATIVE_FALSE='#'
config.log:NATIVE_TRUE=''
But with --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf it works
as expected:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80967
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to ryan.burn from comment #2)
> That's built from trunk only less than 2 months ago. Are you certain this is
> invalid? Did you actually try to reproduce?
Sure. The bug is fixed already.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80967
--- Comment #2 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
That's built from trunk only less than 2 months ago. Are you certain this is
invalid? Did you actually try to reproduce?
30 matches
Mail list logo
