[Bug c++/81032] New: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with lambda and broken constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81032 Bug ID: 81032 Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with lambda and broken constexpr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery,

[Bug tree-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug target/80862] [x86] Wrong rounding results for some test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80862 --- Comment #3 from Yulia Koval --- Fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=249009

[Bug middle-end/81030] New: ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030 Bug ID: 81030 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/81029] New: Compiling sketch with arduinodroid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81029 Bug ID: 81029 Summary: Compiling sketch with arduinodroid Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug fortran/80009] Printing/writing a structure with a real edit descriptor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- After a lot of head scratching I think I am changing my mind on this one. If one tries to assign to a real variable as in: program test_b_write_dt_mod use :: B_write_dt_mod implicit none

[Bug target/80966] ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Jun 9 03:46:08 2017 New Revision: 249046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249046=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Don't add an immediate to r0 (PR80966) If there is a large stack

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/81028] GCC miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Version|7.0

[Bug c++/81028] New: miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 Bug ID: 81028 Summary: miscompiles placement new Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug fortran/81027] New: Assumed-shape array reported as deferred.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81027 Bug ID: 81027 Summary: Assumed-shape array reported as deferred. Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/81000] std::any improvement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81000 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > (Of course, a different implementation of std::any might be easier to > optimize) >From a quick test, if instead of storing a pointer to _S_manage we store a

[Bug c++/81026] New: Lookup of dependent member template incorrectly finds non-member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81026 Bug ID: 81026 Summary: Lookup of dependent member template incorrectly finds non-member Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #3 from Doug Gilmore --- It appears that r248863 just tickles the bug. With the attached example produced by delta the failure mode is exposed by r248862.With luck, I may be able to bisect the problem to an earlier commit.

[Bug rtl-optimization/26493] -freorder-blocks-and-partition is a dud without generated profiling data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81015] Bad codegen for __builtin_clz(unsigned short)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81015 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81015] Bad codegen for __builtin_clz(unsigned short)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81015 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 8 19:42:59 2017 New Revision: 249039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249039=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81015 Revert: 2016-12-14 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 8 19:42:59 2017 New Revision: 249039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249039=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81015 Revert: 2016-12-14 Uros Bizjak

[Bug rtl-optimization/80693] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80693 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0) > Also, the costs dump in the first replacement looks wrong: > original costs 0 + 4 + 4 = 0 This is correct: 0 means undefined. You usually get it from a

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:23:34 2017 New Revision: 249038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249038=gcc=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Convert

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:13:51 2017 New Revision: 249037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249037=gcc=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Convert

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:12:38 2017 New Revision: 249036 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249036=gcc=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Convert

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:10:49 2017 New Revision: 249035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249035=gcc=rev Log: PR c/81006 * c-typeck.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Convert

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:04:40 2017 New Revision: 249034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249034=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81011 * cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_finish_clause): When changing

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 19:02:09 2017 New Revision: 249032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249032=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81011 * cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_finish_clause): When changing

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 18:55:04 2017 New Revision: 249031 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249031=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81011 * cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_finish_clause): When changing

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] New: [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 Bug ID: 81025 Summary: [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/81005] -fsanitize=null and -fsanitize=alignment doesn't check aggregate arguments of calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81005 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 8 18:53:16 2017 New Revision: 249030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249030=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81005 * ubsan.c (instrument_null): Avoid pointless

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #2 from Doug Gilmore --- Created attachment 41511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41511=edit patch needed to build r248863 for MIPS

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #1 from Doug Gilmore --- Created attachment 41510 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41510=edit Patch to constrain the number of multi-lib variants

[Bug sanitizer/81023] False positiv stack-use-after-scope (worked with GCC 6, fails with GCC 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81023 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81015] Bad codegen for __builtin_clz(unsigned short)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81015 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 8 17:28:19 2017 New Revision: 249028 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249028=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81015 Revert: 2016-12-14 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/59874] Missing builtin (__builtin_clzs) when compiling with g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874 --- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 8 17:28:19 2017 New Revision: 249028 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249028=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81015 Revert: 2016-12-14 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/78620] C++11, Padding bytes not zero-intialized when POD is initialized with compiler generated default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-linux

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 41508 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41508=edit What an unrolled cshift could look like This is what an unrolled version of cshift could look like, for a simple

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk, I'm planning to backport it to the branches too.

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I thought this was fixed only for certain floating-point formats - and even for those, not globally for all targets (not for binary128 on 32-bit targets)?

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 --- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt --- Thanks Martin!

[Bug c++/81024] ICE within convert_like_real with std::initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81024 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE within |ICE within

[Bug middle-end/79988] [7/8 Regression][CHKP] ICE in tree check: accessed operand 5 of call_expr with 4 operands in ix86_expand_builtin, at config/i386/i386.c:36851

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79988 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Ivchenko --- Author: aivchenk Date: Thu Jun 8 16:05:59 2017 New Revision: 249023 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249023=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-08 Alexander Ivchenko PR

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- If you undo that change then you can't link C++17 programs using std::string at all, not just using LTO. That's why the change was done in the first place.

[Bug c++/81024] New: ICE within convert_like_real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81024 Bug ID: 81024 Summary: ICE within convert_like_real Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug sanitizer/80973] ICE with lambda and -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80973 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41507=edit gcc8-pr80973.patch Untested fix.

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #12 from Azat --- > Started with r238959. If you revert this then it fixes some of problems (even though this is a temporary solution), but there are more, and now this is *only without -flto* (i.e. -Wall "-Werror -Wunknown-pragmas

[Bug sanitizer/81023] New: False positiv stack-use-after-scope (worked with GCC 6, fails with GCC 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81023 Bug ID: 81023 Summary: False positiv stack-use-after-scope (worked with GCC 6, fails with GCC 7) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81022] New: invalid address with pointer type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81022 Bug ID: 81022 Summary: invalid address with pointer type casting Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 79990, which changed state. Bug 79990 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7790 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79990 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/79990] [CHKP] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79990 Alexander Ivchenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/81021] New: stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 Bug ID: 81021 Summary: stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81009] missing aliasing optimization for const restrict pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81009 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, the constness can be cast away without changing the effect of the rule. Similar to the C++ rule we discussed in bug 80794 I feel that constness is an underappreciated opportunity to generate better code

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] New: [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 Bug ID: 81020 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/81019] New: [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81019 Bug ID: 81019 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jun 8 14:27:45 2017 New Revision: 249018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249018=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/81017 add noexcept to std::function move operations PR

[Bug sanitizer/80973] ICE with lambda and -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 --- Comment #5 from Sagar Shah --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Yes, and the move assignment operator. cool.. thanks!

[Bug sanitizer/80973] ICE with lambda and -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80973 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81018] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81018 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot

[Bug c++/65816] Constructor delegation does not perform zero-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81018] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81018 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81018] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81018 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- Sorry, that was intended to be a PM...

[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 --- Comment #3 from wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Hi Carl, Just FYI, now that you've fixed the bug, and there are no plans to backport the patch, you should go ahead and set the status of the bug to RESOLVED FIXED. I know this differs

[Bug c++/65816] Constructor delegation does not perform zero-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-04-20 00:00:00 |2017-6-8 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, and the move assignment operator.

[Bug c/81006] ICE with zero-size array and #pragma omp task depend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81006 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Jun 8 12:38:27 2017 New Revision: 249010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249010=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitize/80932 * c-c++-common/ubsan/pr80932.c: Test with

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- Reproduced with -m32 on x86_64. Silly me. Will fix. pr80932.c:10:88: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -413853711 * -6 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

[Bug tree-optimization/60510] SLP blocks loop vectorization (with reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2016-09-05

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2015-04-29

[Bug sanitizer/80953] Support libsanitizer on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- [...] > For ODR violation bug we have a local patch in libsanitizer. Could you check > whether you applied all local patches listed in

[Bug target/73350] AVX512: GCC optimizes away rounding flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 --- Comment #8 from Kirill Yukhin --- Author: kyukhin Date: Thu Jun 8 11:24:50 2017 New Revision: 249009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249009=gcc=rev Log: [PR73350][PR80862] Improve subst for RC-capable insns. PR target/73350,80862

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- trunk (checking=release): trippels@gcc67 gcc % gcc -O0 -fsanitize=undefined ./gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr80932.c trippels@gcc67 gcc % ./a.out gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr80932.c:10:88:

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2017-06/msg00104.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2017-06/msg00105.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2017-06/msg00107.html

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 --- Comment #3 from Sagar Shah --- thanks for taking a look at this. Are we going to have noexcept added in the function move ctor.?

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Can't reproduce. What arch, is that gcc or g++, ...

[Bug c/80959] -Wreturn-type "control reaches end of non-void function" false positive with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Can be also simulated with ObjC: $ cat /tmp/objc.m volatile int i; int foo (void) { @try { switch (i) { case 1: switch (i) { default: return 0;

[Bug tree-optimization/81003] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in optimize_range_tests_to_bit_test, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81003 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41500 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41500=edit gcc8-pr81003.patch We can't allow ->op to be something other than SSA_NAME or NULL (the latter means GIMPLE_COND at

[Bug c/80959] -Wreturn-type "control reaches end of non-void function" false positive with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- So there's explanation what happens: 1) w/o -fsanitize=address: decide_copy_try_finally returns true and so that we copy BB that contains finally statement: foo () { int n; int D.1806; bar ();

[Bug sanitizer/80963] UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80963 --- Comment #5 from Jan Engelhardt --- >Where would those magic numbers come from? We don't have anything like that. Maybe something similar to .build-id?, i.e. randomly-generated IDs (per .so) that merely serve to distinguish two structs.

[Bug tree-optimization/81018] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81018 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/81018] New: [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81018 Bug ID: 81018 Summary: [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/80963] UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80963 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jan Engelhardt from comment #3) > The question is more like - can it be made to work even if (In reply to > Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > > > That is Archive in the shared library and in

[Bug debug/81001] incorrect debug info for parameter that is const pointer to typedef of array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81001 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be related to const don't applies to the array itself but to the type which the array is of in both c and c++ .

[Bug sanitizer/80963] UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80963 --- Comment #3 from Jan Engelhardt --- The question is more like - can it be made to work even if (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > That is Archive in the shared library and in the main executable are > considered two different

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- #include #include #include struct Foo { std::vector vec; std::function f; }; int main() { std::vector vec; vec.reserve(10); }

[Bug libstdc++/81017] Class with vector of unique_ptr and std::function does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It goes from: _ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED1Ev/37 (__comp_dtor ) @0x7f9a6e65eb80 Type: function definition

[Bug c++/81007] [7/8 Regression] ICE with virtual function in broken class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- [...] > Besides, can you *pretty please* concentrate on the issue at hand in > this PR, i.e. the failing

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |lto --- Comment #10 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/81016] [7/8 Regression] ICE: segfault with template struct specialisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/81011] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp task and inaccessible copy-constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81011 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Version|unknown

[Bug c++/81013] [7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid union in class hierarchy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81013 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Version|unknown

  1   2   >