[Bug target/81132] New: [m68k] internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81132 Bug ID: 81132 Summary: [m68k] internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81131] New: [m68k] internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81131 Bug ID: 81131 Summary: [m68k] internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/81101] ICE with -fself-test=.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1) > > End-users aren't meant to see this; this is for people building GCC from > > source, with checking enabled (the

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #48 from Daniel Santos --- Created attachment 41588 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41588=edit proposed fix v6 2/2 (libgcc) The only thing this changes from your patches is some macro names and testing

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41533|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug driver/81101] ICE with -fself-test=.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1) > End-users aren't meant to see this; this is for people building GCC from > source, with checking enabled (the self-tests are a no-op in a release > build). >

[Bug driver/81101] ICE with -fself-test=.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Or maybe print something like: BEGIN QUOTE /home/jwakely/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/selftest.c:305: test_locate_file: FAIL: unable to open file: ./example.txt A gcc selftest has failed. Investigation of the source

[Bug driver/81101] ICE with -fself-test=.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- End-users aren't meant to see this; this is for people building GCC from source, with checking enabled (the self-tests are a no-op in a release build). So the "user" in question here is a developer,

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.2

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80562] [7/8 Regression] ICE using if constexpr with nonconstant expression in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80562 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80562] [7/8 Regression] ICE using if constexpr with nonconstant expression in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80562 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 20:56:08 2017 New Revision: 249389 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249389=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80562 - ICE with constexpr if. * semantics.c

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 20:56:02 2017 New Revision: 249388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249388=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80829 - ICE with constexpr copy of base subobject. *

[Bug c++/80562] [7/8 Regression] ICE using if constexpr with nonconstant expression in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80562 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 20:55:27 2017 New Revision: 249387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249387=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80562 - ICE with constexpr if. * semantics.c

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 20:55:21 2017 New Revision: 249386 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249386=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80829 - ICE with constexpr copy of base subobject. *

[Bug c++/81130] New: ICE OpenMP shared clause in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81130 Bug ID: 81130 Summary: ICE OpenMP shared clause in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2584 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/80633] [7/8 Regression] -Wstrict-aliasing false positive

from Casey Carter --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1) > I can't reproduce this with 20170619. Are you still seeing it? Nope - it appears to have disappeared on trunk.

[Bug middle-end/81120] __builtin_nansl ("") generates quiet NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > Is there a gcc option to select between convertFormat and copy? Loads do There is no such option.

[Bug libgcc/66955] Bootstrap error: libcc1 compiled as shared library despite --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66955 --- Comment #3 from Michael Goldshteyn --- I should also mention that doing the obvious: ../configure --with-pic ... ..., does not fix this issue. You still get: libtool: link: .../gcc-7.1.0/build/./gcc/xg++ -B.../gcc-7.1.0/build/./gcc/

[Bug libgcc/66955] Bootstrap error: libcc1 compiled as shared library despite --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66955 Michael Goldshteyn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgoldshteyn at comcast dot net ---

[Bug c++/81073] [5/6/7/8 Regression] link failure as C++ misses to instanciate some objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7) > > To make things even worse, all the PROGMEM + inline asm + > > statement-expression stuff is hidden behind common usability macros that are > > used by

[Bug c++/80633] [7/8 Regression] -Wstrict-aliasing false positive

||2017-06-19 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- I can't reproduce this with 20170619. Are you still seeing it?

[Bug c++/80562] [7/8 Regression] ICE using if constexpr with nonconstant expression in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80562 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/67074] Name lookup ambiguity between namespace and its alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67074 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/53402] [C++11] non-inline namespace can be wrongly re-opened as inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53402 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79766] inline namespace and ::

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79766 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81124] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in operator*, at cp/cp-tree.h:726

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81124 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81124] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in operator*, at cp/cp-tree.h:726

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81124 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Mon Jun 19 19:11:31 2017 New Revision: 249385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249385=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81124 PR c++/79766 * name-lookup.c

[Bug c++/79766] inline namespace and ::

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79766 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Mon Jun 19 19:11:31 2017 New Revision: 249385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249385=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81124 PR c++/79766 * name-lookup.c

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/80972] [7/8 Regression] ICE with alignas and __attribute__((packed))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80972 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/81073] [5/6/7/8 Regression] link failure as C++ misses to instanciate some objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #4) > I would already be happy if the AVR backend could diagnose situation where > C++ magic shreds assumptions of const + PROGMEM. That would be good. > In order

[Bug c++/81073] [5/6/7/8 Regression] link failure as C++ misses to instanciate some objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 18:20:48 2017 New Revision: 249383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249383=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81073 - constexpr and static var in statement-expression. *

[Bug c++/81073] [5/6/7/8 Regression] link failure as C++ misses to instanciate some objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 18:20:10 2017 New Revision: 249382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249382=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81073 - constexpr and static var in statement-expression. *

[Bug middle-end/81120] __builtin_nansl ("") generates quiet NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-06-19 1:32 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120 > > --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> --- > Of

[Bug c/61399] LDBL_MAX is incorrect with IBM long double format / overflow issues near large values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61399 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The current proposed wording for DR#467 changes "maximum representable finite floating-point number, [ math formula ]" to

[Bug middle-end/81120] __builtin_nansl ("") generates quiet NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Of course, such a test is fairly meaningless without -fsignaling-nans. Then, where long double and double have the same format, "Whether C assignment (6.5.16) (and conversion as if by

[Bug target/71778] [6/7/8 Regression][ARM] ICE using non-constant argument to Neon intrinsic that requires constant arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71778 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71778] [6/7/8 Regression][ARM] ICE using non-constant argument to Neon intrinsic that requires constant arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71778 --- Comment #9 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Mon Jun 19 17:12:12 2017 New Revision: 249380 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249380=gcc=rev Log: Backport: [Patch ARM] Fix PR71778 gcc/ PR target/71778 *

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/45886] [ARM] support for __ARM_PCS_VFP predefined symbol in gcc 4.5.x would be very nice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45886 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/45886] [ARM] support for __ARM_PCS_VFP predefined symbol in gcc 4.5.x would be very nice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45886 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- Closing. All versions of gcc since 4.6 have supported __ARM_PCS_VFP. Older versions are no-longer maintained.

[Bug target/71778] [6/7/8 Regression][ARM] ICE using non-constant argument to Neon intrinsic that requires constant arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71778 --- Comment #8 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Mon Jun 19 16:58:03 2017 New Revision: 249379 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249379=gcc=rev Log: Backport: [Patch ARM] Fix PR71778 gcc/ PR target/71778 *

[Bug target/46128] There is no mechanism for detecting VFP revisions in ARM GCC.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46128 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79767] inline namespace and unqualified definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79767 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80279] Implement DR 2061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80279 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81129] New: GCC successfully compiles expression into nothing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81129 Bug ID: 81129 Summary: GCC successfully compiles expression into nothing Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/60063] [5/6/7/8 Regression] -Wunused-local-typedefs warning despite attribute used in a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60063 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70844] [6/7/8 Regression] spurious -Wuseless-cast warning with inherited constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70844 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 19 16:21:40 2017 New Revision: 249378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249378=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70844 - -Wuseless-cast and inheriting constructor. *

[Bug c++/70844] [6/7/8 Regression] spurious -Wuseless-cast warning with inherited constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70844 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/11751] wrong evaluation order of an expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11751 --- Comment #90 from Emil Obermayr --- Dear Oleg, You have three printf, but only 2 outputs. You don't tell us, what the right output should be, and why. Your tests are highly dependent on the order of evaluation. So the only use is to detect

[Bug target/80732] target_clones does not work with dlsym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80732 --- Comment #9 from Yichao Yu --- Thanks for the fix! Does it fix https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78366 at the same time?

[Bug sanitizer/81125] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81125 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 19 15:28:42 2017 New Revision: 249376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249376=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/81125 * ubsan.h (enum ubsan_encode_value_phase): New.

[Bug sanitizer/81111] [8 Regression] Cannot build libstdc++ with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 19 15:27:40 2017 New Revision: 249375 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249375=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/8 * ubsan.c (ubsan_encode_value): If

[Bug c/81128] Function multi-versioning does not work with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128 --- Comment #3 from Billy O'Mahony --- Created attachment 41585 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41585=edit Preprocessed main file

[Bug c/81128] Function multi-versioning does not work with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128 --- Comment #2 from Billy O'Mahony --- COLLECT_GCC=gcc-6 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 6.2.0-3ubuntu11~16.04'

[Bug tree-optimization/81118] [8 Regression] ice in remove_redundant_iv_tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/80887] gnat bootstrap fails at s-regpat.o: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80887 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81118] [8 Regression] ice in remove_redundant_iv_tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 19 15:08:02 2017 New Revision: 249374 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249374=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-19 Richard Biener PR middle-end/81118

[Bug target/71607] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [ARM] ice due to forbidden enabled attribute dependency on instruction operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Mon Jun 19 15:01:11 2017 New Revision: 249372 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249372=gcc=rev Log: PR71607: Fix ICE when loading constant 2017-06-19 Prakhar Bahuguna

[Bug bootstrap/80887] gnat bootstrap fails at s-regpat.o: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80887 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 19 15:01:13 2017 New Revision: 249373 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249373=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-19 Richard Biener PR

[Bug inline-asm/70184] Explicit register variables holding function arguments overwritten by conversion libcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/81128] Function multi-versioning does not work with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128 Billy O'Mahony changed: What|Removed |Added CC||billy.o.mahony at intel dot com ---

[Bug target/80970] [7 Regression] internal compiler error in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat

[Bug ipa/81112] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have range_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81112 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 19 14:35:18 2017 New Revision: 249371 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249371=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/81112 * g++.dg/torture/pr81112.C: Add -Wno-psabi to

[Bug c/81128] New: Function multi-versioning does not work with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128 Bug ID: 81128 Summary: Function multi-versioning does not work with -Ofast Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81119] [8 Regression] -Wshadow warns on "typedef struct foo foo;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81119 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81119] [8 Regression] -Wshadow warns on "typedef struct foo foo;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81119 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Mon Jun 19 14:13:58 2017 New Revision: 249369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249369=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81119 * name-lookup.c (update_binding): Only warn about

[Bug rtl-optimization/80474] [6 regression] ipa-cp wrongly adding LO(symbol) twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80474 --- Comment #17 from Jan Smets --- Patch confirmed to work on the original code. Thanks.

[Bug sanitizer/80879] False positive for -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80879 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|8.0

[Bug sanitizer/80879] False positive for -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80879 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jun 19 13:27:48 2017 New Revision: 249368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249368=gcc=rev Log: Initialize live_switch_vars for SWITCH_BODY == STATEMENT_LIST (PR sanitizer/80879).

[Bug tree-optimization/81126] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81126 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/80732] target_clones does not work with dlsym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80732 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80732] target_clones does not work with dlsym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80732 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jun 19 13:12:51 2017 New Revision: 249365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249365=gcc=rev Log: Fix multi-versioning issues (PR ipa/80732). 2017-06-19 Martin Liska

[Bug tree-optimization/81126] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81126 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81127] Complex division misses BB vectorisation opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81127 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81119] [8 Regression] -Wshadow warns on "typedef struct foo foo;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81119 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/81124] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in operator*, at cp/cp-tree.h:726

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81124 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/81127] New: Complex division misses vectorisation opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81127 Bug ID: 81127 Summary: Complex division misses vectorisation opportunity Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 66093, which changed state. Bug 66093 Summary: g++ produces incorrect output on code with constexpr function initializing class with private fields https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66093 What

[Bug c++/66093] g++ produces incorrect output on code with constexpr function initializing class with private fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66093 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66093] g++ produces incorrect output on code with constexpr function initializing class with private fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66093 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jun 19 10:15:57 2017 New Revision: 249364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249364=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-19 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/66093] g++ produces incorrect output on code with constexpr function initializing class with private fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66093 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug target/81121] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81121 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/81126] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81126 Bug ID: 81126 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1743 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug libstdc++/81122] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is probably caused by https://wg21.link/lwg2381

[Bug libstdc++/81122] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59423] Misleading warning when 'enum class' base type unresolved: elaborated-type-specifier for a scoped enum must not use the ‘class’ keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59423 __vic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.v.a at ngs dot ru --- Comment #1 from __vic

[Bug c++/81119] [8 Regression] -Wshadow warns on "typedef struct foo foo;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81119 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81121] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81121 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/81125] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81125 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/81123] ICE while compiling with -O1 -fstrict-overflow -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81123 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 81123, which changed state. Bug 81123 Summary: ICE while compiling with -O1 -fstrict-overflow -floop-nest-optimize https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81123 What|Removed

[Bug sanitizer/81125] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81125 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/81121] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/81119] [8 Regression] -Wshadow warns on "typedef struct foo foo;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81119 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/81113] ICE with AVX structure field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81113 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- This kind of arbitrary mixing of ISA options on types vs functions isn't really supported. All that context dependent mode selection stuff is a hack as it doesn't extend to containers or as you see decls

[Bug tree-optimization/81090] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81118] [8 Regression] ice in remove_redundant_iv_tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/81125] New: [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81125 Bug ID: 81125 Summary: [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

  1   2   >