[Bug tree-optimization/38497] PRE missing a load PRE which causes a loop to have two BBs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38497 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > now what is left is hoisting *a_2(D) to after the call. But that's not PRE. Yes I agree with this but hoisting was added to PRE and we still don't optimize it

[Bug tree-optimization/80617] [missed optimization] Storing constant in two possibly-aliased locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80617 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > C testcase: I have seen that testcase before in a bug report but I can't find the bug report :(.

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/80726] [7/8 Regression] Destructor not inlined anymore (regression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/68467] libgcc, compilation for target m68k-linux breaks in linux_atomic.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467 --- Comment #17 from angelo --- Hi Carlos, maybe you can try one of these 2 toolchains i prepared years ago: http://sysam.it/toolchains.html Regads, Angelo On 25/06/2017 20:40, csotoalonso at gmail dot com wrote: >

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc

[Bug target/68467] libgcc, compilation for target m68k-linux breaks in linux_atomic.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467 Carlos Soto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||csotoalonso at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/81201] The final asm code doesn't check if a function changes the value of ebx, resulting in segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81201 --- Comment #2 from arget at autistici dot org --- Well... this is embarrasing, ok... XD I though the problem was in the ebx, because returning from chacha(), ebx = 0... but now I looked carefully the chacha() asm code and there isn't any

[Bug target/81201] The final asm code doesn't check if a function changes the value of ebx, resulting in segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81201 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/81202] New: Concept parsing error for default template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81202 Bug ID: 81202 Summary: Concept parsing error for default template arguments Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/81201] New: The final asm code doesn't check if a function changes the value of ebx, resulting in segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81201 Bug ID: 81201 Summary: The final asm code doesn't check if a function changes the value of ebx, resulting in segmentation fault. Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status:

[Bug libgcc/81199] fallback definition of count_leading_zeros references hidden symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81199 --- Comment #2 from coypu --- To relay a comment on the netbsd bug, "I don't think (the proposed idea) is correct and the real problem is that we are linking libgcc first (again)."

[Bug libstdc++/81200] New: regex classatomcollatingelement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81200 Bug ID: 81200 Summary: regex classatomcollatingelement Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libfortran/81195] SPEC CPU2017 621.wrf_s failure with 40+ openmp threads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #7) > I have reproduced the same problem from the gcc-7 branch. I fully expect this bug to be in all active branches of gfortran. We should commit a fix to all of them.

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 --- Comment #14 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > Fixed on trunk sofar. Odd. Looks broken to me in 20170622. Did the patch go in ?

[Bug middle-end/80775] [8 Regression] -O3 produces ice in group_case_labels_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80775 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/80763] [7/8 Regression] -O3 causes error: inline clone in same comdat group list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80763 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- Still seems to be broken, over a month later.

[Bug ada/62235] segmentation fault on Ada 2012 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug ada/62235] segmentation fault on Ada 2012 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41605|0 |1 is obsolete|