[Bug rtl-optimization/81301] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 13 dominated by a block in the cold partition (8)) on 32-bit BE powerpc target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81301 Bug ID: 81301 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 13 dominated by a block in the cold partition (8)) on 32-bit BE powerpc target

[Bug rtl-optimization/81300] New: -fpeephole2 breaks __builtin_ia32_sbb_u64, _subborrow_u64 on AMD64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300 Bug ID: 81300 Summary: -fpeephole2 breaks __builtin_ia32_sbb_u64, _subborrow_u64 on AMD64 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81299] New: Spurious "set but not used" warning with constexpr variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81299 Bug ID: 81299 Summary: Spurious "set but not used" warning with constexpr variable Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66967] thread local's destructor not called if compile with -fno-use-cxa-atexit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66967 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #8 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de --- Am 03.07.2017 um 23:40 schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81297] [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81297 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Ah, no, only the gimple code drops overflow, the generic code doesn't :-( I am still convinced the fix will not be in match.pd.

[Bug sanitizer/81281] [6/7/8 Regression] UBSAN: false positive, dropped promotion to long type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81297] [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81297 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Strange, gimple_resimplify2 already calls drop_tree_overflow, and I am calling it myself everywhere else in this transformation... I'll have to check how exactly that OVF flag appears.

[Bug c++/81293] sanitized g++ crashes heap-use-after-free gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:543 in printf_common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81293 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- configure.ac:33: error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69. ../config/override.m4:12: _GCC_AUTOCONF_VERSION_CHECK is expanded from... configure.ac:33: the top level

[Bug tree-optimization/81297] [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81297 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 41671 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41671=edit Proposed patch This is the patch I'm testing.

[Bug target/81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose --- PR81298 mentions a related issue, reproducible on x86_64.

[Bug target/81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||81295 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Could be a duplicate of PR 81298.

[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|Bootstrap fails

[Bug bootstrap/81298] Bootstrap fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 41670 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41670=edit Output of make -j4

[Bug bootstrap/81298] New: Bootstrap fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Bug ID: 81298 Summary: Bootstrap fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81294] _subborrow_u64 argument order inconsistent with intrinsic reference, icc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- It looks like (now fixed) bug in the documentation. So, following patch should sync gcc with the fixed docs: --cut here-- Index: adxintrin.h ===

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- bootstraps with the trunk, still fails with r249929 on the branch.

[Bug c++/65775] Late-specified return type bypasses return type checks (qualified, function, array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65775 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65775] Late-specified return type bypasses return type checks (qualified, function, array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65775 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jul 3 18:10:52 2017 New Revision: 249935 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249935=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-07-03 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug fortran/79843] diagnostics: missing word in fortran/symbol.c, conflict_std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79843 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79866] diagnostics: typo in "Variable %s at %L of type EVENT_TYPE"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79866 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79866] diagnostics: typo in "Variable %s at %L of type EVENT_TYPE"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79866 --- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Jul 3 18:03:51 2017 New Revision: 249934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249934=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug c++/53157] within lambda, error: lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53157 bartek 'basz' szurgot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at baszerr dot eu ---

[Bug c++/58894] C++11 lambda doesn't take const variable by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58894 bartek 'basz' szurgot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at baszerr dot eu ---

[Bug fortran/79843] diagnostics: missing word in fortran/symbol.c, conflict_std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79843 --- Comment #2 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Jul 3 17:56:08 2017 New Revision: 249933 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249933=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug tree-optimization/81297] New: [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81297 Bug ID: 81297 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #13 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Jul 3 17:42:54 2017 New Revision: 249930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249930=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/81296] derived type I/o problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81296 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81296] New: derived type I/o problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81296 Bug ID: 81296 Summary: derived type I/o problem Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/81295] New: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 Bug ID: 81295 Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/81294] _subborrow_u64 argument order inconsistent with intrinsic reference, icc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #12 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Jul 3 15:53:56 2017 New Revision: 249926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249926=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug c/81294] New: _subborrow_u64 argument order inconsistent with intrinsic reference, icc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294 Bug ID: 81294 Summary: _subborrow_u64 argument order inconsistent with intrinsic reference, icc Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug c/40528] Add a new ifunc attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40528 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/81273] Wrong code generated for ARM setting volatile struct field with a literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81273 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81273] Wrong code generated for ARM setting volatile struct field with a literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81273 --- Comment #5 from LdB --- Okay I understand all that and accept my apology and I will try to follow the rules exactly in future. I had to change the alignment command slightly to be valid on ARM 6.3.1 struct

[Bug rtl-optimization/81290] [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Jul 3 14:40:46 2017 New Revision: 249924 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249924=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81290 * predict.c (force_edge_cold): Be more careful

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, I believe this has been introduced in r244974 from PR71433. We have 5 asserts for SSA_NAME 66 in the problematic function: (gdb) p *asserts.m_auto.m_vecdata[0] $49 = {bb = , e = 37)>, si = {ptr =

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug ipa/81214] GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Fixed by Rainer's commit r249912. Is this a real fix? IMO introducing ifunc on targets that do not support it does not look as a good idea!-(

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The last patch in comment 8 exposes another problem: buf[128] is too small. The following patch which uses the trick proposed in IRC by Richi to split assemble_name_raw seems to work ---

[Bug target/81273] Wrong code generated for ARM setting volatile struct field with a literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81273 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to LdB from comment #3) > I am stunned you could not build the code the only requirement is you > include the stdint.h so the uint32_t types are defined. I will fix the typos > are you really

[Bug target/81273] Wrong code generated for ARM setting volatile struct field with a literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81273 --- Comment #3 from LdB --- I am stunned you could not build the code the only requirement is you include the stdint.h so the uint32_t types are defined. I will fix the typos are you really saying you can't compile this? #include struct

[Bug sanitizer/81040] asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 60510, which changed state. Bug 60510 Summary: SLP blocks loop vectorization (with reduction) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8) > > > Looking into the error I suppose problem is: > ___cold_sect_of_allocate: > __ZN9__gnu_cxx16bitmap_allocatorIcE8allocateEmPKv.cold.42: > > and bit later > >

[Bug tree-optimization/60510] SLP blocks loop vectorization (with reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/60510] SLP blocks loop vectorization (with reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jul 3 13:44:13 2017 New Revision: 249919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249919=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-03 Richard Biener PR

[Bug ipa/81214] GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > At revision r249851 I see the following regression on darwin > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mvc6.c (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED:

[Bug sanitizer/81040] asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040 --- Comment #15 from Andrey Ryabinin --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14) > Fixed on trunk. Thanks. However there is slight problem with this. Instrumentation is missing without -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope option. IMO, it

[Bug c++/81293] New: sanitized g++ crashes heap-use-after-free gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:543 in printf_common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81293 Bug ID: 81293 Summary: sanitized g++ crashes heap-use-after-free gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_int erceptors_format.inc:543 in printf_common Product:

[Bug rtl-optimization/81290] [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/81291] [5/6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-ter -fno-tree-vrp -funroll-loops due to improper carry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/80751] NULL pointer dereferencing in gfc_trans_call on compiling call to an elemental procedure (trunk 247930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80751 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca --- After downloading trunk 249883 I can confirm the bug disappeared.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81290] [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems a different order in release_ssa_name in that function, in one case it is 198, 2, 199, 23, 40, in the other case 199, 2, 40, 23, 198. Used --- tree-ssanames.c.xx 2017-07-01 10:15:12.0 +0200

[Bug rtl-optimization/81290] [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #9) > Maybe it's also worthwhile to commit testcase from PR81284? I don't think this is necessary because the ICEs when building libgcc, even with

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 --- Comment #9 from Arseny Solokha --- Maybe it's also worthwhile to commit testcase from PR81284?

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14) > Well, I've just noticed that the revision I identified is problematic > because of compilation errors like: > >

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Jul 3 12:17:59 2017 New Revision: 249904 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249904=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/81285 * loop-doloop.c (add_test): Update profile.

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- Well, I've just noticed that the revision I identified is problematic because of compilation errors like: /home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/include/c++/8.0.0/type_traits:143:12: error: ‘value’ is not a

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11) > > Unfortunately the bisection was unsuccessful (no wonder > > given that the failure is not 100%

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11) > Unfortunately the bisection was unsuccessful (no wonder > given that the failure is not 100% reproducible (GC related)). Well, I can help you with that.

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Likely r249880.

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Yes, your patch fixes the problem. Thanks.

[Bug sanitizer/81040] asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Unfortunately the bisection was unsuccessful (no wonder given that the failure is not 100% reproducible (GC related)).

[Bug sanitizer/81040] asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jul 3 11:48:47 2017 New Revision: 249903 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249903=gcc=rev Log: ASAN: handle addressable params (PR sanitize/81040). 2017-07-03 Martin Liska

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > The bisection looks weird, that is the point before which the unreduced > > testcase obviously will fail to

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > The bisection looks weird, that is the point before which the unreduced > testcase obviously will fail to compile, but that doesn't mean it is the > point where

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81286] [6/7 Regression] building for powerpc*-unknown-linux-gnu target fails with RTL checking enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81286 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/81286] [6/7 Regression] building for powerpc*-unknown-linux-gnu target fails with RTL checking enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81286 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81292] New: [8 regression] ICE in zero_length_string, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:822

tion --with-tune=generic Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20170703 (experimental) [trunk revision 249892] (GCC)

[Bug target/81285] [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, does the following patch fix ppc/ia64 (I have checked that it fixes the arm testcase mentioned earlier). honza Index: loop-doloop.c === ---

[Bug target/81286] [6/7 Regression] building for powerpc*-unknown-linux-gnu target fails with RTL checking enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81286 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Created attachment 41666 [details] > gcc7-pr81286.patch > > Untested fix. gpc_reg_operand allows in some cases a SUBREG of a REG, but > REGNO is not valid in

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems to be between loop and loopinit passes, will need to watch carefully the SSA_NAME freeing.

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Anyway, I've reproduced it on x86_64-linux with the unreduced testcase, trying to find which pass starts the differences on

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > The bisection looks weird, that is the point before which the unreduced > testcase obviously will fail to compile, but that doesn't mean it is the > point

[Bug target/81291] New: [5/6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-ter -fno-tree-vrp -funroll-loops due to improper carry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291 Bug ID: 81291 Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-ter -fno-tree-vrp -funroll-loops due to improper carry Product: gcc

[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- The bisection looks weird, that is the point before which the unreduced testcase obviously will fail to compile, but that doesn't mean it is the point where the -fcompare-debug bug has been introduced.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81290] New: [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290 Bug ID: 81290 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in update_br_prob_note Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

  1   2   >