https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
dongkyun.s at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81890
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
--- Comment #6 from dongkyun.s at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 42017
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42017=edit
obj made by '-Os -mtune=cortex-a12'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
dongkyun.s at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42014|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
--- Comment #4 from dongkyun.s at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 42014
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42014=edit
memset_test_cortex-a9.o (made by '-Os -mtune=cortex-a12')
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dongkyun.s at samsung dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to dongkyun.s from comment #0)
> Found related issue in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888.
Unrelated bug report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|link-failure|
Target|arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81907
Bug ID: 81907
Summary: undefined reference to `memset'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81296
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 42012
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42012=edit
A patch being tested.
This patch adds a check for the DT descriptor in the format label. Preliminary
test show that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Vadim Zeitlin from comment #5)
> Perhaps you could consider this as a QoI issue, but it would be really great
> if gcc could give a warning if the code tries to use fesetround() without
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #7 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FloatingPointMath
Yes, I've seen this, thanks. But do you think it's easily discoverable? I admit
I had even seen this page (and knew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FloatingPointMath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #5 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
Yes, I did find this documentation myself in the meanwhile and I agree that
you're formally correct, just as gcc developers are formally correct in the
long discussion at #34678 (which I really wouldn't want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81141
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to comment #3)
What I meant to say is: See also bug 81141 for a related request (limited to
strncpy). The patch submitted there issues a warning for a small subset of the
problem (strncpy) but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Vadim Zeitlin from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > You want -frounding-math
>
> OK, thanks, this does indeed solve my immediate problem. However is it
> really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #3 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> You want -frounding-math
OK, thanks, this does indeed solve my immediate problem. However is it really
normal that the compiler behaviour silently (!) changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Aug 20 21:31:39 2017
New Revision: 251211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251211=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
PR c/81854
* src/c++98/compatibility.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81867
--- Comment #3 from Al Thomason ---
I will see if I am able to test using a newer rev, the GCC compiler seems to be
rather deeply embedded into the Arduino IDE...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53782
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
Bug ID: 81906
Summary: Calls to rint() wrongly optimized away starting in g++
6
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81056
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth ---
Note that the main deviation from the previous back porting for gcc-6-branch is
that the ipa-icf-gimple.c source file must define INCLUDE_LIST since it is used
in that file for gcc-5-branch unlike
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81056
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Aug 20 19:00:59 2017
New Revision: 251209
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251209=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/81056
* testsuite/17_intro/names.cc: Undef 'd'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth ---
Verified that proposed changes in PR81037_gcc5.patch with Xcode 8.2.1 on
darwin15.6.0 and Xcode 9 beta 5 on 10.13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-08/msg00045.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81056
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Aug 20 18:52:59 2017
New Revision: 251208
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251208=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/81056
* testsuite/17_intro/names.cc: Undef 'd'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth ---
Created attachment 42011
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42011=edit
proposed back port of changes from trunk for gcc-5-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45065
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77732
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Aug 20 18:40:28 2017
New Revision: 251207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251207=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/77732
* gcc.dg/ipa/ipcp-cstagg-7.c: Xfail on 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54574
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77732
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Aug 20 18:23:41 2017
New Revision: 251206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251206=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/77732
* gcc.dg/ipa/ipcp-cstagg-7.c: Xfail on 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53972
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53782
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80837
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
Seems to be fixed in gcc7.2.0: https://godbolt.org/g/jRwtZN
gcc7.2 is fine with -m32, -mx32, and -m64, but x32 is the most compact. -m64
just calls __atomic_load_16
gcc7.2 -O3 -mx32 output:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81901
Bug ID: 81901
Summary: false-positive -Warray-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81905
Bug ID: 81905
Summary: partial_sort slower than sort
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53360
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If we add this to expression it compiles OK:
expression& operator=(const expression&) { return *this; }
So the invalid instantiation of column::operator=(const column&) comes
from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81898
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
Summary|[7/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81898
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81904
Bug ID: 81904
Summary: FMA and addsub instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.1.0 |7.2.0
--- Comment #5 from
48 matches
Mail list logo
