[Bug middle-end/78809] Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug target/82274] __builtin_mul_overflow fails to detect overflow for int64_t when compiled with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82549] New: ICE at -O1 and above: verify_gimple failed

-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171013 (experimental) [trunk revision 253721] (GCC

[Bug middle-end/78809] Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 Qing Zhao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/82548] New: After -r 253646 GCC 8.0 can't build cross compiler for mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82548 Bug ID: 82548 Summary: After -r 253646 GCC 8.0 can't build cross compiler for mingw32 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/81404] suggested hints for standard C macros should avoid GCC predefined macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81404 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/82353] [8 Regression] runtime ubsan crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82353 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 20:19:17 2017 New Revision: 253744 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253744=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/82353 * g++.dg/ubsan/pr82353-2.C: New test. *

[Bug target/82274] __builtin_mul_overflow fails to detect overflow for int64_t when compiled with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 20:14:34 2017 New Revision: 253743 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253743=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82274 * internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): If both

[Bug target/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 --- Comment #7 from Igor Kozhukhov --- i can provide build zone on on real SPARC64 T5220 with DilOS if needed. just ping me directly to igor at dilos dot org. i have with DilOS: gcc-4.4.7 (32bit default) + SunAS + illumos ld - for dilos-illumos

[Bug c++/82357] [8 Regression] bogus error: cannot bind bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82357 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82357] [8 Regression] bogus error: cannot bind bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82357 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Oct 13 19:03:41 2017 New Revision: 253739 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253739=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82357 - bit-field in template * tree.c

[Bug fortran/81048] [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Oct 13 18:59:34 2017 New Revision: 253738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253738=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/81048 *

[Bug c++/70515] Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|gcc at norgg dot

[Bug fortran/82511] [7/8 Regression] ICE Bad IO basetype (12) on attempted read or write of entire DEC structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82511 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:39:26AM +, foreese at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Fritz Reese changed: > > Under other DEC compilers, it seems STRUCTUREs are to be treated consistently > with derived types in

[Bug c++/69078] [C++14] function local static not initialized when only used in a generic/variadic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69078 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69078] [C++14] function local static not initialized when only used in a generic/variadic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69078 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 13 17:38:50 2017 New Revision: 253736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253736=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-13 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/82274] __builtin_mul_overflow fails to detect overflow for int64_t when compiled with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 17:26:28 2017 New Revision: 253735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253735=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82274 * internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): If both

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 Alex Potapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opotapenko at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/82274] __builtin_mul_overflow fails to detect overflow for int64_t when compiled with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82274 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 17:19:12 2017 New Revision: 253734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253734=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82274 * internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): If both

[Bug other/82547] New: wide_int is not setting overflow properly for large unsigned add/subtract calculations.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82547 Bug ID: 82547 Summary: wide_int is not setting overflow properly for large unsigned add/subtract calculations. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/82509] DW_AT_endianity issues with attribute scalar_storage_order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > This uses your patch to gcc, plus the following patch to gdb: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-10/msg00266.html Great, thanks for the testing.

[Bug target/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/68093] [concepts] friend function declarations that differ only by constraints are rejected as redefinitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68093 --- Comment #1 from Eric Niebler --- Still happens on trunk, 2 years later: template concept bool True = true; template struct S { friend bool operator==(S, int) requires True { return true; } friend bool operator==(S, int) requires

[Bug middle-end/82546] New: tree_size handling for TYPE nodes is confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82546 Bug ID: 82546 Summary: tree_size handling for TYPE nodes is confused Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 80873, which changed state. Bug 80873 Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy when trying to use an overloaded function without a definition in a lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80873 What|Removed

[Bug c++/80873] ICE in tsubst_copy when trying to use an overloaded function without a definition in a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80873 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80873] ICE in tsubst_copy when trying to use an overloaded function without a definition in a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80873 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 13 16:50:13 2017 New Revision: 253733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253733=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-13 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- glibc does not use this option. ABI checking in glibc works on binaries via objdump -T. linknamespace tests do use -aux-info to list functions exported by a header, and would find it

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- > Debian and Glibc use it for ABI checking; I and others use it to help generate > C bindings for my toy language without having to write a C parser for no > reason I always have maintained that this is an

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01668.html

[Bug c++/82478] Rejects valid access to private member type that should be allowed by friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82478 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced: struct true_type { static const bool value = true; }; struct false_type { static const bool value = false; }; template using void_t = void; template struct

[Bug target/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|go |target Assignee|ian at airs

[Bug target/82540] gcc 6.4.0 bootstrap with java core dump in file with illumos ld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82540 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug libstdc++/57925] discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes it's still open, so a fix would be welcome. Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html if you want to contribute a fix for it.

[Bug other/82543] libbacktrace does not retrieve function names on 64 bit windows (using mingw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82543 --- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin --- Checked on the trunk version of libbacktrace (r253491) Issue still exists

[Bug c++/82531] ICE: Segmentation fault (-std=c++1z -fconcepts)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82531 --- Comment #2 from Arturs Zoldners --- Created attachment 42363 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42363=edit archive of 3 test cases of ICE vs base what compiles Here are the test cases. The base compiles. 3 other are

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42362=edit a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42361 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42361=edit a32/a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42360 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42360=edit v7 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42359 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42359=edit a32/a64 intrinsics not supported by the arm target

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #10 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42358 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42358=edit v7 intrinsics not supported by the arm target

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42357 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42357=edit Full list of intrinsics supported in a64

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42356 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42356=edit Full list of intrinsics supported in a32/a64

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42355 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42355=edit Full list of intrinsics supported in v7/a32/a64

[Bug target/71233] [ARM] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- I used the perl script and intrinsics list to build several subsets: # List of duplicates: (a few intrinsics are listed twice # with different prototypes, it's likely a bug in the documentation, # not

[Bug target/71233] [ARM] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42354 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42354=edit perl parser This is a perl script to parse intrinsics.txt and produce a list like: [...] v7/A32/A64

[Bug target/71233] [ARM] missing AdvSIMD poly64 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42353 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42353=edit Neon intrinsics list This list is the result of the conversion of

[Bug go/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The call to abort makes this seem more like a problem in the unwind code in libgcc than a problem with the Go compiler. Can you find out exactly what code in uw_context_1 is calling abort? Try running

[Bug go/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 --- Comment #3 from Igor Kozhukhov --- additional info by mdb: igork@bld13:~/builds/igork/du2/components/gcc-6$ mdb core Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ] > $C 7fffd1a1 libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+8(1, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0) 7fffd251

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] [7/8 Regression] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug libstdc++/82522] std::map::insert(value_type &&) not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |7.3 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/82481] dangling reference in mutex:693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82481 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/82522] std::map::insert(value_type &&) not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Oct 13 12:39:32 2017 New Revision: 253725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253725=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/82522 overload map insert functions for rvalues (LWG 2354)

[Bug libstdc++/82481] dangling reference in mutex:693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82481 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Oct 13 12:39:24 2017 New Revision: 253724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253724=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/82481 Suppress clang-tidy warnings PR libstdc++/82481

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 --- Comment #4 from Ivo Raisr --- The reproducer was C-reduce'd from a large source file (30 MB) which is not publicly available.

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 --- Comment #3 from Ivo Raisr --- $ cat reduced.c extern void c(int); extern void d(void); void a(void) { { int b; __builtin_setjmp(0); c(b); } d(); }

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 --- Comment #2 from Ivo Raisr --- Created attachment 42352 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42352=edit C-reduced reproducer, not reformatted

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 Ivo Raisr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivo.raisr at oracle dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] New: -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 Bug ID: 82545 Summary: -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/82522] std::map::insert(value_type &&) not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug go/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 --- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov --- forgot to add gcc-6 bootstrap info on DilOS on Intel: root@z165:/rws1/users/root/du2/components/gcc-6# gcc-6 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-6

[Bug go/82544] gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 --- Comment #1 from Igor Kozhukhov --- DilOS on Intel. for example: the same codebase of gcc-6.4.0 + illumos ld on Intel is working fine: root@z165:/rws1/users/root/du2/components/gcc-6# gccgo-6 -o t hello.go

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/82509] DW_AT_endianity issues with attribute scalar_storage_order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509 --- Comment #4 from Peeter Joot --- Here's the debug session that shows the compiler+debugger stack playing nicely together: (gdb) n 40 int cb = memcmp( , , sizeof( b ) ); (gdb) p bt $1 = {v = 3, a = {1, 2, 3, 4}} (gdb) p b $2 = {v =

[Bug c++/82531] ICE: Segmentation fault (-std=c++1z -fconcepts)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82531 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/82509] DW_AT_endianity issues with attribute scalar_storage_order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509 --- Comment #3 from Peeter Joot --- Created attachment 42350 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42350=edit test case used to verify Eric's patch in a gdb session.

[Bug go/82544] New: gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82544 Bug ID: 82544 Summary: gccgo on SPARC64 produce bad binary Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug other/82543] New: libbacktrace does not retrieve function names on 64 bit windows (using mingw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82543 Bug ID: 82543 Summary: libbacktrace does not retrieve function names on 64 bit windows (using mingw) Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/82435] new __attribute__((alias)) warning gets in the way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82435 --- Comment #10 from Arnd Bergmann --- I get a clean kernel build now with that option, thanks a lot for your help!

[Bug c/71996] -fdump-translation-unit fails to dump string literals of type char16_t/char32_t/wchar_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71996 --- Comment #2 from Ben Longbons --- It's now called -fdump-lang-raw, and for some reason it's only active in C++ mode (filed bug #82542). But this bug is still present with those changes made.

[Bug c/82542] New: -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 Bug ID: 82542 Summary: -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/82541] New: Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 Bug ID: 82541 Summary: Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/82525] [GRAPHITE] codegen error for modulo operations we cannot represent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82525 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 82525, which changed state. Bug 82525 Summary: [GRAPHITE] codegen error for modulo operations we cannot represent https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82525 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/82451] [GRAPHITE] codegen error in get_rename_from_scev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcj/82540] New: gcc 6.4.0 bootstrap with java core dump in file with illumos ld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82540 Bug ID: 82540 Summary: gcc 6.4.0 bootstrap with java core dump in file with illumos ld Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/82499] x86: small stack initial adjustments could use push

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82499 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82499] x86: small stack initial adjustments could use push

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82499 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Oct 13 10:04:59 2017 New Revision: 253718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253718=gcc=rev Log: i386: Check red zone size in push peephole2 Check red zone size, instead of

[Bug fortran/81048] [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/82539] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 82539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/82539] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Don't we have a DUP of this already? Any kind of gimplify_expr after initial gimplification is problematic with -ftrapv.

[Bug tree-optimization/82539] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3

[Bug tree-optimization/82539] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82539 Bug ID: 82539 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5693 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/82524] [7/8 Regression] expensive-optimizations produces wrong results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524 --- Comment #19 from Vasilis.Vlachoudis at cern dot ch --- Just to say thank you guys, amazing :)

[Bug target/82524] [7/8 Regression] expensive-optimizations produces wrong results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82524] [7/8 Regression] expensive-optimizations produces wrong results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 07:39:42 2017 New Revision: 253711 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253711=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82524 * config/i386/i386.md (addqi_ext_1, andqi_ext_1,

[Bug target/82524] [7/8 Regression] expensive-optimizations produces wrong results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 07:29:51 2017 New Revision: 253710 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253710=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82524 * config/i386/i386.md (addqi_ext_1, andqi_ext_1,

[Bug target/82498] Missed optimization for x86 rotate instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82498 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 07:28:46 2017 New Revision: 253709 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253709=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82498 * fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Code cleanups,

[Bug target/82498] Missed optimization for x86 rotate instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82498 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 13 07:17:06 2017 New Revision: 253708 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253708=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82498 * config/i386/ia32intrin.h (__rold, __rord,

[Bug tree-optimization/82355] [8 Regression] ICE in outermost_loop_in_sese, at sese.c:301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82355 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Oct 13 07:02:55 2017 New Revision: 253707 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253707=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-13 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/82451] [GRAPHITE] codegen error in get_rename_from_scev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82451 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Oct 13 07:02:55 2017 New Revision: 253707 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253707=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-13 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/82525] [GRAPHITE] codegen error for modulo operations we cannot represent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82525 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Oct 13 06:59:13 2017 New Revision: 253706 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253706=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-13 Richard Biener PR