[Bug c/83696] New: false positive warning when [[fallthrough]] is inside of if statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83696 Bug ID: 83696 Summary: false positive warning when [[fallthrough]] is inside of if statement Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/83685] [8 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83685 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Target

[Bug c++/83690] [8 regression] spurious unused variable warings for variables used only in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83690 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/83680] [8 regression] Numerous regressions on arm since r256093

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83680 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug other/83694] New test case gcc.dg/pr83666.c from r256232 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83694 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*, sparc*-*-*

[Bug target/83682] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6296

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83682 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/83684] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_diag_overlap, at gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:1371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83684 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |

[Bug tree-optimization/83695] New: ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 Bug ID: 83695 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/82801] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error with Eigen and __attribute__((always_inline, flatten))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801 gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugs at

[Bug fortran/45689] [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Bug 45689 depends on bug 47988, which changed state. Bug 47988 Summary: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403: insn does not satisfy its constraints https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47988 What

[Bug target/47988] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403: insn does not satisfy its constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47988 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83626] std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Gunnerson --- Thanks for the quick fix!

[Bug tree-optimization/83693] missing strlen optimization for array of arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83693 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/83622] [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622 --- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- That's what I have been trying to find out :-) It's jogging my memory but I cannot for the life of me rememeber what it was about. Paul On 4 January 2018 at 22:00, anlauf at gmx

[Bug libstdc++/83566] cyl_bessel_j returns wrong result for x>1000 for high orders.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83566 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83555] Unnecessary null check when static_cast is used with references.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83607] std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug libstdc++/83626] std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug other/83694] New: New test case gcc.dg/pr83666.c from r256232 ICEs on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83694 Bug ID: 83694 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr83666.c from r256232 ICEs on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/83626] std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 4 22:58:59 2018 New Revision: 256269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256269=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83626 Don't throw for remove("") and remove_all("") PR

[Bug tree-optimization/83693] New: missing strlen optimization for array of arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83693 Bug ID: 83693 Summary: missing strlen optimization for array of arrays Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/83692] Rejects valid constexpr with unrelated code fixing problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83692 David Stone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at doublewise dot net --- Comment

[Bug c++/83692] New: Rejects valid constexpr with unrelated code fixing problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83692 Bug ID: 83692 Summary: Rejects valid constexpr with unrelated code fixing problem Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings using sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Fruzynski --- In general case yes, this can produce a lot of false positives. I wanted to use this only for strings stored in fixed-size buffer. Existing string-related warnings

[Bug target/83387] PowerPC64: Infinite loops in do_reload() with -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #20 from Peter

[Bug fortran/83622] [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- trans-array.c has: /* Returns true if the expression is an array pointer. */ static bool is_pointer_array (tree expr) { if (flag_openmp) return false; [...] Is there a reason behind this?

[Bug target/83554] [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:41274 with -mmitigate-rop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83554 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83554] [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:41274 with -mmitigate-rop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83554 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 4 21:54:23 2018 New Revision: 256268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256268=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83554 * config/i386/i386.md (*hi3_1 splitter): Use

[Bug lto/83121] [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00257.html

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings using sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The warning does see that range (it's in the output of the -fdump-tree-vrp option). The challenge with using ranges is to avoid false positives from excessive bounds. For sizes, typically only the lower

[Bug bootstrap/81926] [7 regression] go/parse.o differs between stage2 and stage3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926 --- Comment #39 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Thu Jan 4 21:47:35 2018 New Revision: 256267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256267=gcc=rev Log: Avoid Solaris/SPARC comparison failures with Solaris as (PR bootstrap/81926)

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7/8 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 43037 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43037=edit proposed UNTESTED patch Everything is so easy once Jeff does all the analysis :). As mentioned, there is no rhyme

[Bug other/82352] [7 Regression] comdat-local function called by void h::i() outside its comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82352 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 4 21:13:17 2018 New Revision: 256266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256266=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/82352 * g++.dg/ipa/pr82352.C (size_t): Define to

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #6 from Ville Voutilainen --- As stated in the other comments, this breaks *users* of existing Qt versions. Any fix would apply to newer versions only. QVector bit-blasts an object of a type with a virtual table over an object of

[Bug fortran/83683] eoshift accepts wrong-length boundary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83683 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 45689, which changed state. Bug 45689 Summary: [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/31392] [meta-bug] gfortran problems with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31392 Bug 31392 depends on bug 45689, which changed state. Bug 45689 Summary: [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/30932] [meta-bug] fortran intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30932 Bug 30932 depends on bug 45689, which changed state. Bug 45689 Summary: [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/45689] [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45689] [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jan 4 21:04:23 2018 New Revision: 256265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256265=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-04 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/83683

[Bug fortran/83683] eoshift accepts wrong-length boundary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83683 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jan 4 21:04:23 2018 New Revision: 256265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256265=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-04 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/83683

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings using sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Fruzynski --- > There is nothing to indicate that the first call to memcpy() in comment #0 > overlaps so -Wrestrict doesn't warn for it. I thought that fix for bug 83373 will somehow

[Bug fortran/83679] [6 regression] r256113 causes regression on pr77942.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83679 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- I don't consider this a regression. The warnings are justified and it wasn't a design goal to let casts suppress them. I agree it would be useful for compatibility with Clang (that's why I raised the bug),

[Bug fortran/83679] [6 regression] r256113 causes regression on pr77942.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83679 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jan 4 20:18:58 2018 New Revision: 256264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256264=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-04 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/83679] [6 regression] r256113 causes regression on pr77942.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83679 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jan 4 20:16:23 2018 New Revision: 256263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256263=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-04 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings using sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- There is nothing to indicate that the first call to memcpy() in comment #0 overlaps so -Wrestrict doesn't warn for it. One thing to note is that the warning treats raw memory functions slightly differently

[Bug fortran/83679] [6 regression] r256113 causes regression on pr77942.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83679 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.2 |6.4 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/83679] [6 regression] r256113 causes regression on pr77942.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83679 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/83679] [6 regression] r256113 causes regression on pr77942.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83679 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83507] [8 Regression] ICE in internal_dfa_insn_code_* for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- I've managed to generate a couple of additional testcases for this PR in December. Next week I'll check whether this ICE is still there w/ my setup.

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/83691] New: Invalid gpr_reg_operand handling in powerpcspe port

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83691 Bug ID: 83691 Summary: Invalid gpr_reg_operand handling in powerpcspe port Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/83690] New: [8 regression] spurious unused variable warings for variables used only in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83690 Bug ID: 83690 Summary: [8 regression] spurious unused variable warings for variables used only in static_assert Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings using sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Looks that something is not working properly. I have pasted output from compilation of function in 1st post, and -Wrestrict complained only about last memcpy call. Please

[Bug c++/83689] Internal compiler error using is_trivially_default_constructible on array of nontrivially-destructible types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83689 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- #include struct X { X() {} }; void test01() { static_assert(std::is_trivially_constructible::value); } ICEs too (but not std::is_constructible).

[Bug c++/83689] Internal compiler error using is_trivially_default_constructible on array of nontrivially-destructible types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83689 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83585] [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text section} - `.LCOLDB0' {.text.unlikely section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83585] [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text section} - `.LCOLDB0' {.text.unlikely section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 4 17:47:55 2018 New Revision: 256256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256256=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/83585 * bb-reorder.c (insert_section_boundary_note): Set

[Bug c++/83689] New: Internal compiler error using is_trivially_default_constructible on array of nontrivially-destructible types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83689 Bug ID: 83689 Summary: Internal compiler error using is_trivially_default_constructible on array of nontrivially-destructible types Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings using sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/83559] [8 regression] -Wsuggest-attribute=const conflicts with -Wattributes warning about const attribute on function returning void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83559 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Fixed in r256188. Thanks for the quick fix! One thing I'm still wondering, though, what's the recommended way for maintaining compatibility with old compilers

[Bug c/83688] Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski --- This also would allow to catch code which use sprintf to concatenate strings, what is an undefined behavior (snippet from https://linux.die.net/man/3/snprintf):

[Bug c++/83667] ICE in dump_function_decl on a thunk with variadic arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Jan 4 15:49:28 2018 New Revision: 256254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256254=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/83667] Fix tree_dump ICE

[Bug c/83688] New: Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83688 Bug ID: 83688 Summary: Please check if buffers may overlap when copying strings Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/82352] [7 Regression] comdat-local function called by void h::i() outside its comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82352 --- Comment #6 from Holger Hopp --- The patch fixes my >10 original issues with gcc-7. It also fixes similar (other, fewer) issues with gcc-6 (gcc-6.2.1 was ok, gcc-6.3.1 not ok, with patch ok). So please downport this patch also to gcc-6

[Bug target/83687] New: ARM NEON invalid optimisation for vabd/vabdl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687 Bug ID: 83687 Summary: ARM NEON invalid optimisation for vabd/vabdl Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/82882] [8 regression] ICE Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/83686] [8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in determine_visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83686 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/82096] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/83686] New: [8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in determine_visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83686 Bug ID: 83686 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in determine_visibility Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/83683] eoshift accepts wrong-length boundary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83683 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- Another thing that is incorrectly accepted, also with -fcheck=bounds: program main implicit none integer :: n integer :: i,n1, n2, n3 character(len=3), parameter :: e(2,3,4) =

[Bug target/83387] PowerPC64: Infinite loops in do_reload() with -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83387] PowerPC64: Infinite loops in do_reload() with -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug middle-end/83685] [8 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83685 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- $ cat score.i int b; char c; int _setjmp(); void a(); void d() { int e; while (b) { if (_setjmp()) a(e); if (c) { e--; a(); } e++; } }

[Bug middle-end/83680] [8 regression] Numerous regressions on arm since r256093

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83680 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/81933] [7/8 Regression] Invalid "constexpr call flows off the end of the function" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81933 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- And I bet the solution will be to handle empty classes in split_nonconstant_init_1 or somewhere similar.

[Bug middle-end/83680] [8 regression] Numerous regressions on arm since r256093

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83680 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Jan 4 14:39:03 2018 New Revision: 256251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256251=gcc=rev Log: PR83680: Inverted test in arm_vectorize_vec_perm_const

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83387] PowerPC64: Infinite loops in do_reload() with -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387 --- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Jan 4 14:36:35 2018 New Revision: 256250 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256250=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83387 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c

[Bug middle-end/83685] New: [8 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83685 Bug ID: 83685 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/83466] Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- This also fixes the original failure: miscompiled efl that causes python3-efl to fail to build.

[Bug middle-end/83684] New: [5 Regression] ICE in maybe_diag_overlap, at gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:1371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83684 Bug ID: 83684 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in maybe_diag_overlap, at gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:1371 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/83683] eoshift accepts wrong-length boundary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83683 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81933] [7/8 Regression] Invalid "constexpr call flows off the end of the function" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81933 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Here's what happens. We get the "flows off" error because: 4151 if (tree init = DECL_INITIAL (r)) 4152 { 4153 init = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, init, 4154

[Bug fortran/83683] New: eoshift accepts wrong-length boundary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83683 Bug ID: 83683 Summary: eoshift accepts wrong-length boundary Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug rtl-optimization/83628] [8 Regression] performance regression when accessing arrays on alpha

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- On a related note, gcc-5 (-O2) was able to also simplify: int test (int a, int b, int c) { return (a < b) * 4 + c; } cmplt $16,$17,$17 s4addl $17,$18,$0 ret $31,($26),1 where gcc-8

[Bug c/83682] New: [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6296

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83682 Bug ID: 83682 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6296 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/83507] [8 Regression] ICE in internal_dfa_insn_code_* for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2

[Bug target/83507] [8 Regression] ICE in internal_dfa_insn_code_* for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- I cannot reproduce this on either powerpc-linux or powerpc64-linux.

[Bug target/83554] [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:41274 with -mmitigate-rop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83554 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Comment on attachment 43035 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43035 gcc8-pr83554.patch >(any_rotate:HI (match_dup 0) (const_int 8))) > (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))] >

[Bug rtl-optimization/83628] [8 Regression] performance regression when accessing arrays on alpha

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- The MULT is not canonical. For some reason we do not realise we can do the ASHIFT as SI instead of DI.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83628] [8 Regression] performance regression when accessing arrays on alpha

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug target/83681] New: epiphany: config/epiphany/epiphany.h:883:8: error: unknown type name 'rtl_opt_pass'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83681 Bug ID: 83681 Summary: epiphany: config/epiphany/epiphany.h:883:8: error: unknown type name 'rtl_opt_pass' Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/83627] -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor doesn't trigger when calling destructor by hand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83627 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Tangentially related: Bug 60262

[Bug debug/83666] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE with -O2 -g --param=sccvn-max-scc-size=10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83666 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >