https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not fully fixed yet, the testcase still ICEs with:
-O2 -g -gstatement-frontiers -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining
-fgcse-sm -floop-parallelize-all -fno-tree-loop-im
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 6 07:48:31 2018
New Revision: 256309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256309=gcc=rev
Log:
PR debug/83480
* toplev.c (process_options): Don't enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83694
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83682
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 6 07:47:32 2018
New Revision: 256308
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256308=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/83682
* rtl.h (const_vec_duplicate_p): Only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83694
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 6 07:46:39 2018
New Revision: 256307
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256307=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/83694
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_expr): Punt if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83711
Bug ID: 83711
Summary: GNU GCC version in geraphviz dot data
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
Bug ID: 83710
Summary: Unsigned with Signed multiplication followed by right
shift
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83709
Bug ID: 83709
Summary: Inserting duplicates into an unordered associative
containers causes the container to invalidate
iterators
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez ---
In my sandbox I see no discernible difference between GCC 6 and current
mainline (r256265).
I am testing with:
./xgcc -B./ -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -march=core-avx2 -lm c-ray-f.c
cat ~/scene |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83559
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The GCC manual says that "It does not make sense for a const function to return
void" so I would tend to think of the suggestion as a bug. With that, I would
recommend either disabling
foo(dummy)
$ gcc -E foo.c
# 1 "foo.c"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 1 "" 2
# 1 "foo.c"
"8.0.0 20180105 (experimental)"
foobar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83704
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is this with or without Janne's library side patch?
with or without.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83704
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83707
Bug ID: 83707
Summary: memcmp inline expansion causing g++.dg/eh/simd-3.C to
fail on power7 -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
--- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, that's r256279.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
r256779 seems to have cleared up the inline-c.c test case failures (at least on
powerpc64) but it causes a couple other tests to fail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #4 from Nathan T. Weeks ---
Fortran 2008 appears to have tightened restrictions on explicit-shape arrays in
the main program and made this particular case illegal (per section 5.3.8.2
"Explicit-shape array"):
C531 (R516) An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
Bug ID: 83706
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c and
gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c fail starting with r256279
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 23:51:22 2018
New Revision: 256301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256301=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83626 simplify filesystem::remove and filesystem::remove_all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83704
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705
Bug ID: 83705
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with large values of REPEAT after
revision r256284
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83684
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
w1, 3
str w1, [x0]
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE342:
.size _Z7seq_cstRiRSt6atomicIiE, .-_Z7seq_cstRiRSt6atomicIiE
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.0.0 20180105 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83704
Bug ID: 83704
Summary: pr31243 revisited
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79283
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:47:50 2018
New Revision: 256296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256296=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83279 handle sendfile not copying entire file
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:48:00 2018
New Revision: 256298
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256298=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83600 fix end iterator for unready std::match_results
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:47:54 2018
New Revision: 256297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256297=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83598 don't modify flags passed to std::basic_regex constructors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79283
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:47:42 2018
New Revision: 256294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256294=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79283 fix filesystem::read_symlink for /proc
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:22:12 2018
New Revision: 256290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256290=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83279 handle sendfile not copying entire file
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:22:17 2018
New Revision: 256291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256291=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83598 don't modify flags passed to std::basic_regex constructors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 22:22:28 2018
New Revision: 256292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256292=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83600 fix end iterator for unready std::match_results
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83335
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey ---
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00348.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Good point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 21:43:56 2018
New Revision: 256289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256289=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83279 Use non-null offset argument for sendfile
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Gunnerson ---
Regarding the ENOENT fix above, it should no longer be necessary to call
synlink_status() in fs::remove(). All cases are already handled without that
check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79283
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 21:27:20 2018
New Revision: 256286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256286=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79283 fix filesystem::read_symlink for /proc
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 21:27:25 2018
New Revision: 256287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256287=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83626 Don't report errors when removing non-existent files
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83703
Bug ID: 83703
Summary: Loop termination condition ignored in -O3, works in
-O2 or with smaller values
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50892
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Following r256284 (PR 78534) the original testcase ICE's. Interestingly, the
reduced testcases in #c2 and #c3 work fine.
The patch below fixes the ICE
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399
--- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Fri Jan 5 20:43:20 2018
New Revision: 256285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256285=gcc=rev
Log:
works without regressions - still seeing problems re: bug 83399
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83684
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50892
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83702
Bug ID: 83702
Summary: missing strlen range optimization for calls with an
offset
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Regrssion tested on x86_64-pc-freeBSD, no failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> AFAIR most of (if not all) the PRs are exposed via -fcoarray=lib
> -lcaf_single.
Yes, I meant to write "-fcoarray=lib -lcaf_mpi". If the errors are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Ah yes, I can reproduce it with all those options and -m32. I could
swear to have tried exactly that yesterday; pilot error I guess.
CA is not just a hard register, but a fixed register, btw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Thanks for this! For anyone looking at this, I'll be glad to assist
> with parallel execution testing via -fcoarray=lib.
AFAIR most of (if not all) the PRs are exposed via -fcoarray=lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534
--- Comment #20 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Jan 5 19:01:12 2018
New Revision: 256284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256284=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 78534 Change character length from int to size_t
In order to handle large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310
--- Comment #17 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Jan 5 19:01:12 2018
New Revision: 256284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256284=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 78534 Change character length from int to size_t
In order to handle large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Honza, can you please have a look? It is unclear to me what is supposed to fix
up the aux chain after fixup_partitions turns some previously hot bbs into cold
ones.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also, this does not ICE:
integer :: A(command_argument_count())
a = 1
write (*,*) A
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82439
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83500
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks for this! For anyone looking at this, I'll be glad to assist with
parallel execution testing via -fcoarray=lib.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83699
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 43048
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43048=edit
Patch to check REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
didn't we print a warning if we found VTA and sel-sched enabled at the same
time, too? I guess that might be useful in this case as well. (thanks for
taking care of this!)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zaks at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004
--- Comment #16 from Matt Godbolt ---
I see the target milestone is 7.3, but this bug is still marked NEW. Has there
been any further thought on this? I realise this is a tough one, but we've had
to either disable LTO, or roll back to c++14 on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Likely just latent before. The ICE is because modulo-sched.c in
for (i_reg_move = 0; i_reg_move < nreg_moves; i_reg_move++)
{
ps_reg_move_info *move = ps_reg_move (ps, first_move +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 5 18:02:18 2018
New Revision: 256283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256283=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83626 handle ENOENT due to filesystem race
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83699
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The expmed.c patch is probably a pessimisation in this case.
> extract_bit_field_as_Subreg should probably check that the
> REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE of the inner and outer modes are the same.
> I'll do that as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83507
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83701
Bug ID: 83701
Summary: missing -Wrestrict on strcat to an array depending on
offset
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83699
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
The expmed.c patch is probably a pessimisation in this case.
extract_bit_field_as_Subreg should probably check that the
REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE of the inner and outer modes are the same.
I'll do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83699
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 43047
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43047=edit
Hacky patch
In no-scevccp-outer-10.c, LRA enters a cycle trying to move
(subreg:SI (reg:V2SI R) 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 5 16:40:24 2018
New Revision: 256281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256281=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/83604
* config/i386/i386-builtin.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 5 16:38:17 2018
New Revision: 256280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256280=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/83604
* config/i386/sse.md (VI248_VLBW): Rename to ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83504
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83699
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83690
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43046
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43046=edit
gcc8-pr83690.patch
This does seem to do the job.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83690
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83525
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> This looks very much like a dup of PR83436.
>
> Close as duplicate?
I am going to add the test case and then close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43045
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43045=edit
gcc8-pr83480.patch
In any case, I think this patch is a small step towards the right direction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Apparently we only disable -fvar-tracking-assignments by default if sel-sched,
not disable it unconditionally.
So, while we could and should change:
if (debug_nonbind_markers_p == AUTODETECT_VALUE)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83681
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83694
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 43042
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43042=edit
> gcc8-pr83694.patch
>
> Untested fix.
I've just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
It seems like sel-sched really can't deal with debug insns; I agree it makes
sense to disable all sorts of debug insns when sel-sched is selected/enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651
--- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Before posting a new workaround for PR83356 (the workaround is to use -Os
instead of O2 for this file), I retested the performance numbers as well, and
got slightly different numbers this time. I don't know
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug ID: 83700
Summary: [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Jan 5 13:58:54 2018
New Revision: 256278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256278=gcc=rev
Log:
[PATCH, PR83492] Fix selection of aarch64 big-endian shift
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
