[Bug debug/84776] Indefinite compile time w/ var-tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84776 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug debug/84776] New: Indefinite compile time w/ var-tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84776 Bug ID: 84776 Summary: Indefinite compile time w/ var-tracking Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84610] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:38843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84610 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/84642] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: segfault reading through NULL current_template_parms in synthesize_implicit_template_parm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84642 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/84758] Wrong coverage for quite simple CFG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84758 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84775] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/84682] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (process_address_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Alexandre

[Bug tree-optimization/84775] New: ICE on valid code at -O3: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775 Bug ID: 84775 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Buettner --- I've been focusing my attention on dwarf2read.c (in GDB). I have a patch which fixes this problem, but which introduces a bunch of test suite regressions. (So it's not a very good patch.) I'll be away

[Bug tree-optimization/84774] New: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wrestrict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84774 Bug ID: 84774 Summary: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wrestrict Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/41647] Early Loop Unrolling control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41647 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug testsuite/41660] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/one_time-test-1.c -fplugin=./one_time_plugin.so (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41660 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/26475] tree-ssa loses line numbers for initializations (constants for PHIs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26475 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug target/29997] [meta-bug] various targets: GCC fails to encode epilogues in unwind-info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/32340] [arm] libjava build failure due to missing thread synchronization primitives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32340 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/84773] New: [7/8 Regression] Cross-compilers do not use aligned_alloc or _aligned_malloc for aligned-new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84773 Bug ID: 84773 Summary: [7/8 Regression] Cross-compilers do not use aligned_alloc or _aligned_malloc for aligned-new Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/12955] Incorrect rounding of soft float denorm mul/div

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12955 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/84526] [8 Regression] ICE in generic_overlap at gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:927 since r257860

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/83662] std::aligned_alloc() not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83662 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/78565] undefined reference to `aligned_alloc' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78565 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- i.e. I think this is a dup of PR libstdc++/79190

[Bug libstdc++/78565] undefined reference to `aligned_alloc' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78565 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/84770] [8 Regression] ICE with parameter pack involving typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84770 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The ICE is due the assert below failing: gcc_assert (strip_typedefs_expr (arg, NULL) == arg); arg is arg:0 constant arg:0

[Bug libstdc++/84769] variant::get(): unscoped call to get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84769 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/84769] variant::get(): unscoped call to get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84769 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Mar 9 01:10:02 2018 New Revision: 258376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258376=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/84769 qualify std::get and std::get_if to avoid ADL PR

[Bug c++/84770] [8 Regression] ICE with parameter pack involving typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84770 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84767] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- At the point the "Local declaration from a different function" error is issued in verify_expr(t) where t is PARAM_DECL for the argument to A's ctor, context is: while cfun->decl is .

[Bug fortran/82859] derived type character component, array comparison inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82859 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84767] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84772] New: powerpc-spe: Spurious "is used uninitialized" warning, or possibly incorrect codegen for va_arg(long double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772 Bug ID: 84772 Summary: powerpc-spe: Spurious "is used uninitialized" warning, or possibly incorrect codegen for va_arg(long double) Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status:

[Bug fortran/53296] Segfault on non-constant character array constructor containing kind spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53296 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou --- > Where exactly is this documented? I can't find no references to > __builtin_setjmp or __builtin_longjmp in > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.3.0/gcc.pdf or >

[Bug libstdc++/84769] variant::get(): unscoped call to get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84769 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84768] [7/8 Regression] ICE with failed class template argument deduction because of invalid template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84768 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- oldelt is value > It has been created in: /* Add it to the list. */ if (parameter != error_mark_node) parameter_list = process_template_parm (parameter_list,

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 --- Comment #22 from Wilco --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #21) > > You can use __builtin_setjmp and __builtin_longjmp in the same function, > > only if they use a different buffer. Otherwise it is invalid. > > Yes, that's invalid.

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/84771] New: missing -Wrestrict passing the same address to restrict-qualified arguments of a user-defined function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84771 Bug ID: 84771 Summary: missing -Wrestrict passing the same address to restrict-qualified arguments of a user-defined function Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug c++/84770] New: [8 Regression] ICE with parameter pack involving typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84770 Bug ID: 84770 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with parameter pack involving typedef Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/84768] [7/8 Regression] ICE with failed class template argument deduction because of invalid template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84768 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/84769] New: variant::get(): unscoped call to get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84769 Bug ID: 84769 Summary: variant::get(): unscoped call to get Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 8 21:50:37 2018 New Revision: 258371 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258371=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/84456 * dwarf2out.c (dw_loc_list): If list &&

[Bug c++/84768] New: ICE with failed class template argument deduction because of invalid template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84768 Bug ID: 84768 Summary: ICE with failed class template argument deduction because of invalid template parameter Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/84114] global reassociation pass prevents fma usage, generates slower code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114 --- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey --- > Can you let me know if my workaround helped? If useful I could backport it > to GCC7 as well. Yes, the patch helped. I ran spec 2017 fp rate and saw a small improvement (0.7%). Most of the speed up was

[Bug c++/80598] [7 regression] -Wunused triggers for functions used in uninstantiated templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/80598] [7/8 regression] -Wunused triggers for functions used in uninstantiated templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 8 21:18:50 2018 New Revision: 258370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258370=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80598 * call.c (build_over_call): In templates set TREE_USED

[Bug fortran/70409] Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/68441] ICE on using transfer with character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/70409] Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/84767] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767 Bug ID: 84767 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with pointer to VLA Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/84742] internal compiler error: in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84742 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/84742] internal compiler error: in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84742 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 8 20:55:03 2018 New Revision: 258369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258369=gcc=rev Log: PR inline-asm/84742 * recog.c (asm_operand_ok): Return 0 if

[Bug target/84763] [8 regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Ugh, I overlooked the special case in ix86_compute_frame_layout when there is a call to __builtin_frame_address in the code...

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- This one appears to have been solved along with the fix for pr64124/pr70409. Close as duplicate?

[Bug fortran/68441] ICE on using transfer with character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 07:39:14PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441 > > --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > I believe the patch I just

[Bug libstdc++/84766] __verbose_terminate_handler mistakes parallel unhandled exceptions for recursive std::terminate() calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84766 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/84766] New: __verbose_terminate_handler mistakes parallel unhandled exceptions for recursive std::terminate() calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84766 Bug ID: 84766 Summary: __verbose_terminate_handler mistakes parallel unhandled exceptions for recursive std::terminate() calls Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0

[Bug target/84751] ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't reproduce when using gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-16) (GCC) as system compiler (gcc110).

[Bug target/84751] ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 --- Comment #5 from Will Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #3) > > $ /home/willschm/gcc/trunk.svn/configure --with-cpu=power7 > > --with-long-double-128

[Bug fortran/68441] ICE on using transfer with character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I believe the patch I just committed actually > fixes this issue. Confirmed.

[Bug target/84751] ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #3) > $ /home/willschm/gcc/trunk.svn/configure --with-cpu=power7 > --with-long-double-128 --prefix=/home/willschm/gcc/install/gnc > --disable-bootstrap

[Bug target/84751] ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 --- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > What configure flags for that specially configured gcc? > Can you in a debugger pt whatever tree_operand_hash::hash is called on? > I certainly can't reproduce

[Bug target/84751] ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 --- Comment #2 from Will Schmidt --- Created attachment 43602 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43602=edit config.log

[Bug fortran/68441] ICE on using transfer with character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug target/67288] [6/7/8 regression] non optimal simple function (useless additional shift/remove/shift/add)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- This loop init stuff is created by the RTL loop optimisers; if those could see 0 cannot happen, they can optimise this.

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 64124, which changed state. Bug 64124 Summary: [F95] Valid constant expr rejected https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/64124] [F95] Valid constant expr rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/68441] ICE on using transfer with character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441 Bug 68441 depends on bug 70409, which changed state. Bug 70409 Summary: Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge() https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/70409] Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/64124] [F95] Valid constant expr rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Mar 8 19:06:57 2018 New Revision: 258368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258368=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-08 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/64124

[Bug fortran/70409] Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Mar 8 19:06:57 2018 New Revision: 258368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258368=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-08 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/64124

[Bug fortran/70409] Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Mar 8 19:01:23 2018 New Revision: 258367 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258367=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-08 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/64124] [F95] Valid constant expr rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Mar 8 19:01:23 2018 New Revision: 258367 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258367=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-08 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84764] Wrong warning "so large that it is unsigned" for __int128 constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84764 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- __int128 is not an extended integer type in the C sense. The main reason is because intmax_t is not defined as __int128.

[Bug c/84764] Wrong warning "so large that it is unsigned" for __int128 constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84764 --- Comment #1 from Pascal Cuoq --- I meant "the warning implies that the constant is typed as unsigned long long...".

[Bug c/84764] New: Wrong warning "so large that it is unsigned" for __int128 constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84764 Bug ID: 84764 Summary: Wrong warning "so large that it is unsigned" for __int128 constant Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou --- > Otherwise this looks good: > > === acats Summary === > # of expected passes 2315 > # of unexpected failures 5 > *** FAILURES: c23003b c23003g c23003i c250002 c380004 > >

[Bug tree-optimization/84737] [8 Regression] 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737 --- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen --- Created attachment 43601 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43601=edit ipa-cp dump (r256887) (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > Thank you, may I please ask you for the IPA CP dump

[Bug target/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Emrich --- Otherwise this looks good: === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of unexpected failures5 *** FAILURES: c23003b c23003g c23003i

The Hotel Show Saudi Arabia is Back!

This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlpsend3.com/zZdRJa

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 --- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- I don't argue either way on this, but it looks to me like we do not currently have support for __int128 with vec_ld. 1. I can't fine it in the rs6000-c tables. 2. This test fails to compile:

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou --- > You can use __builtin_setjmp and __builtin_longjmp in the same function, > only if they use a different buffer. Otherwise it is invalid. Yes, that's invalid. > CCing Eric for the other __builtin_setjmp

[Bug target/84763] [8 regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/67288] [6/7/8 regression] non optimal simple function (useless additional shift/remove/shift/add)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug target/84763] [8 Regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/84763] New: [8 Regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763 Bug ID: 84763 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- (In reply to sudi from comment #17) > I looked up what other targets were doing and one thing found to be > interesting was that a lot of them are defining the target hook > TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE. In

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84748] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug target/84760] Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Hm. For this one I think I would recommend we just remove the partial implementation, provided that vec_ld already supports vector __int128.

[Bug target/84748] [8 Regression] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Mar 8 15:50:25 2018 New Revision: 258366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258366=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/84748: Mark *compare_cstore_insn as clobbering

[Bug c/84762] New: GCC for PowerPC32 violates the SysV ABI spec for small struct returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762 Bug ID: 84762 Summary: GCC for PowerPC32 violates the SysV ABI spec for small struct returns Product: gcc Version: 6.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84569] [6 Regression] g++ -g -O3 consumes all memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84569 --- Comment #5 from Jö --- I can report that that indeed fixes the issue for us; the unit test now compiles fine with gcc revision 258359. Thanks a lot!

[Bug tree-optimization/84552] [6/7/8 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84552 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 8 14:41:39 2018 New Revision: 258365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258365=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-08 Richard Biener PR middle-end/84552

[Bug sanitizer/84761] New: AddressSanitizer is not compatible with glibc 2.27 on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 Bug ID: 84761 Summary: AddressSanitizer is not compatible with glibc 2.27 on x86 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/84658] [7/8 Regression] -O3 -fmerge-all-constants causes incorrect for-each loop generation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84658 --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84658 > > --- Comment #22 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment

[Bug target/84760] New: Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84760 Bug ID: 84760 Summary: Finish implementation of __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

  1   2   >