https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85143
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85152
Bug ID: 85152
Summary: VAX ICE with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85151
Bug ID: 85151
Summary: VAX ICE with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Benson ---
A related but possibly different ICE:
module fox_m_fsys_format
interface len
module procedure str_real_dp_len, str_real_dp_fmt_len
end interface
contains
pure function str_real_dp_fmt_len(x, fmt)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71504
--- Comment #5 from Will ---
Oops -
I left the wandbox link on Clang...
Here's the GCC Head link:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/rfvn9VSwZgU6nerN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84031
--- Comment #6 from Will ---
Oops oops - posted on wrong place, can't see how to delete. Ignore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84031
--- Comment #5 from Will ---
Oops - left the wandbox link on Clang...
Here's the GCC Head link:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/rfvn9VSwZgU6nerN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71504
Will changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||will at dash dot org
--- Comment #4 from Will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150
Bug ID: 85150
Summary: internal compiler error for module with illegal
non-constant pointer initialization designator
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85149
Bug ID: 85149
Summary: False branch of if constexpr instantiated in generic
lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85148
Bug ID: 85148
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85143
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to robertw89 from comment #2)
> This change would be trivial.
I did not mean for you to change your code. I meant gcc could do this
transformation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #10 from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
Hello Andrew Pinski!
Ok i have to apologize for not searching in Bugzilla very carefully it seems.
I see now, indeed i was -- even if that sounds inconceivable -- under the
impression that the error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34531
--- Comment #7 from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
Hello Andrew Pinski!
Ok i have to apologize for not searching in Bugzilla very carefully it seems.
I see now, indeed i was -- even if that sounds inconceivable -- under the
impression that the error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85147
Bug ID: 85147
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid variadic
template-template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85143
--- Comment #2 from robertw89 at googlemail dot com ---
This change would be trivial.
To defend my case and rant a bit ;) ...
Indeed, but programmers can manually unroll a loop too ;) . What if the code is
autogenerated? What if the constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85144
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85146
Bug ID: 85146
Summary: ICE with __direct_bases for declared but not defined
struct
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
The paste removed the "di" from "diff" but the patch is otherwise
as posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I'm not the original reporter but you could give us a few *minutes*
at least to resolve these questions by just asking.
The patch in question is this one. (I didn't write it, it was written
by David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 -b --suffix .riscv64_multilib
--fuzz=0
patching file gcc/config/riscv/t-linux-multilib
+ cd nvptx-tools-c28050f60193b3b95a18866a96f03334e874e78f
This is not the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85145
Bug ID: 85145
Summary: GCC 8 regression: include_next broken icw/
--with-gxx-include-dir
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85143
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Mainly this paragraph:
A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration in its context
and when re-evaluated in the completed scope of S. No diagnostic is
required for a violation of this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is invalid code due to [basic.scope.class].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steffen at sdaoden dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pawel_sikora at zoho dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Same as bug 34531.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 34531 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steffen at sdaoden dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
It was changed on trunk in:
commit 371072bf395be11f36ef31bb3cfec06bbfc58597
Author: law
Date: Fri Sep 1 16:26:00 2017 +
* varasm.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84435
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
The build log is here:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/risc-v/logs/gcc-7.3.1-5.2.riscv64.fc28.src.rpm/build.log
Grep the log for "../configure" to see configure line(s).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com wrote:
> GCC 7.3.1 is available in Fedora RISC-V stage4 and is configured with
> multilib,
> but only one ABI is selected. This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85144
Bug ID: 85144
Summary: Wrong assignment with allocatable charlen
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85143
Bug ID: 85143
Summary: Loop limit prevents (auto)vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
Bug ID: 85142
Summary: Wrong -print-multi-os-directory & -print-multi-lib
output for riscv64 + multilib
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #5 from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
Sorry for not providing a test case.
The C++ standard is clear here about this case too.
I have a PDF version of a 2014 draft, and i would not see that in case your
words are implying that gcc is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
The glibc headers depend on the kernel UAPI headers, they need to be available
in the sysroot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85141
Bug ID: 85141
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with pointer arithmetic of
static member function address
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #10 from Peter VARGA ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> You need to recompile gcc telling it to use the new glibc.
>
> When GCC is built it creates fixed dependencies on the C library. You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85140
Bug ID: 85140
Summary: ICE with invalid use of alignas
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
--- Comment #10 from Manuel Lauss ---
Built with gcc-7.3.0 and LTO it works fine; is this a bug in 7.3.0 instead
then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
template class a;
struct b {
typedef a a;
};
Is the reduced testcase. The C++ standard is clear here about this case too.
A diagnostic is not required either. Gcc generates one as it can.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #3 from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
One more, and just to point that out. This code will in a not too distant
future see its 20th birthday (though not updated for long). It has been
developed on Linux and FreeBSD with the wonderful (me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at troutmask dot
apl.washing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > > > (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
--- Comment #6 from Manuel Lauss ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #2)
> > > > This is the most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #2)
> > > This is the most minimal ffmpeg config that can trigger the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Lauss ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #2)
> > This is the most minimal ffmpeg config that can trigger the segfault. The
> > interesting switch is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
59 matches
Mail list logo