https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to dominiq from comment #6)
> Author: dominiq
> Date: Mon Feb 26 09:55:39 2018
> New Revision: 257985
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257985=gcc=rev
> Log:
> 2018-02-26 Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #27 from Liu Hao ---
Some tests failed, but despite the failure, all tests compiled now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #26 from Liu Hao ---
Created attachment 44235
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44235=edit
test results for trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #25 from Liu Hao ---
Created attachment 44234
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44234=edit
test results for trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #24 from Liu Hao ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #23)
> Nothing has been committed for gcc-8-branch so of course it isn't created.
>
> For trunk, did you read comment 14?
Sorry didn't notice it. I started a new build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |target
--- Comment #9 from Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86051
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 4 22:34:39 2018
New Revision: 261174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261174=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85930 fix misaligned reference
PR libstdc++/85930
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86051
Bug ID: 86051
Summary: internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:3717
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86050
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related to PR 54770.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86050
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86005
--- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson ---
Oops, hitting tab doesn't work as expected. Trying again...
This looks like a generic GCC problem, not a RISC-V specific problem. Or
perhaps, not a gcc bug at all.
For instance, if I build an armv6t2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 4 21:38:42 2018
New Revision: 261172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261172=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85930 fix misplaced alignment-specifier
PR libstdc++/85930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86005
--- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson ---
This looks like a generic GCC problem, not a RISC-V specific problem.
For instance, if I build an armv6t2 compiler I get
bl __atomic_fetch_add_4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|carll at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86050
Bug ID: 86050
Summary: Inline break tail-call optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70244
--- Comment #4 from simon at whiteowl dot co.uk ---
I have the same problem but with a much smaller test case (attached above):
/usr/local/bin/gfortran -c planets.f90 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/bin/gfortran
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70244
simon at whiteowl dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at whiteowl dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
Bug ID: 86049
Summary: Array bindings are not const when initializer is
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85888
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This same error just popped up on gcc 8 (r261152 for gcc 8 backported r260541
for trunk) so don't forget about this fix as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
Bug ID: 86048
Summary: [8/9 Regression] .seh_savexmm offset is negative error
when compiling libpng
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85731
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85951
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86008
--- Comment #2 from Matt Whitlock ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Matt Whitlock from comment #0)
> > The following shim allows the code above to compile, although it is
> > sub-optimal because it captures a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86047
Bug ID: 86047
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in for_each_index, at
tree-ssa-loop.c:647
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85955
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 18:03:24 2018
New Revision: 261165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261165=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/85955
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86046
Bug ID: 86046
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.c:2043
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
In addition some ugly cases with null(), losely related to pr66193.
$ cat zn1.f90
program p
real :: z(1) = [real :: null()] + 2.0
end
$ cat zn2.f90
program p
real :: z(1) = [real :: null()] + [real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
Bug ID: 86045
Summary: ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308 (and
others)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #17 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86039
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86044
Bug ID: 86044
Summary: noexcept(false) of constexpr member function ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86043
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86043
Bug ID: 86043
Summary: strlen after memcpy partially overwriting a string not
optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Nothing has been committed for gcc-8-branch so of course it isn't created.
For trunk, did you read comment 14?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86029
--- Comment #5 from Tavian Barnes ---
(In reply to Zsolt from comment #3)
> What is the difference between gcc's and clang's __mulsc3?
The important difference is that Clang (and GCC trunk) expand the fastpath
inline, and fall back on __mulsc3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Jun 4 17:09:01 2018
New Revision: 261162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261162=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-04 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85981
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86041
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86042
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86042
Bug ID: 86042
Summary: [8 Regression] missing strlen optimization after
second strcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86041
Bug ID: 86041
Summary: g++.dg/cpp1z/feat-cxx1z.C fails since 261090
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #22 from Liu Hao ---
```
lh_mouse@lhmouse-pc /e/GitHub/MINGW-packages/mingw-w64-gcc-git $ gcc --version
gcc.exe (master HEAD with MCF thread model, built by LH_Mouse.) 9.0.0 20180604
(experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #21 from Liu Hao ---
On current branch master [1] and gcc-8-branch the libstdc++fs DLL is not
created for x86_64-w64-mingw32.
Please re-open.
[1] remotes/origin/master 84b3cf31c30 PR
target/85832
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:41:31 2018
New Revision: 261160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261160=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-04 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85981
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:07:35 2018
New Revision: 261155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261155=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85930 fix misaligned reference
PR libstdc++/85930
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Jun 4 15:54:48 2018
New Revision: 261154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261154=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-04 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85981
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86040
--- Comment #1 from Luke Morrison ---
Created attachment 44231
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44231=edit
Compiled output from avr-gcc 8.1.0 of the test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86040
Bug ID: 86040
Summary: [avr]: RAMPZ is not always cleared after loading
__flashN data
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jun 4 15:35:49 2018
New Revision: 261152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261152=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/85623 - strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 4 15:16:00 2018
New Revision: 261151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261151=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/61806 - missed SFINAE with partial specialization.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86015
--- Comment #7 from Josh Marshall ---
I got the licensing cleared up over the weekend, and so I can actually
reference the code in question for this.
https://github.com/anadon/Sort-Comparisons-and-Performance-metrics
The only way to track use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85116
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So what is missing is for us to see that for the following __first_21 is
__first_20 + 8B and so we can replace either with the other. IVOPTs figures
this out but nothing before.
# __first_20 = PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
>> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>>> I see several
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86036
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86036
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:49:55 2018
New Revision: 261148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261148=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85832
PR target/86036
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:49:55 2018
New Revision: 261148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261148=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85832
PR target/86036
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:22:52 2018
New Revision: 261146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261146=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85765 - SFINAE and non-type default template arg.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86039
Bug ID: 86039
Summary: Compiler placed in deep/long folder cannot open/run
needed files on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Probably not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #19 from Jordi Vilar ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18)
> That was already done two weeks ago by r260479
Thank you! And a last question: Do you plan to merge both patches into the gcc
8 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86027
--- Comment #3 from Michael Teske ---
Another addition, I now tried the gcc-7 snapshot 20180531 and it is fixed here
as well. I guess I'll used this one or wait for 7.3.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That was already done two weeks ago by r260479
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
Jordi Vilar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||development at jordi dot
vilar.cat
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85478
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
>
> Alexander Monakov changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86036
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44227=edit
gcc9-pr85832.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85656
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Ok and can you please analyze why this return true:
1139/* Creating a symtab alias is the optimal way to merge.
1140 It however can not be used in the following cases:
1141
1142 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86038
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:28:22 2018
New Revision: 261142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261142=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86038
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Bug 85964 depends on bug 86038, which changed state.
Bug 86038 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at
profile-count.h:242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86038
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86022
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86003
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86003
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:46:04 2018
New Revision: 261141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261141=gcc=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/86003 build failures with --with-cpu=xscale
The XScale cpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86003
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:41:45 2018
New Revision: 261140
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261140=gcc=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/86003 build failures with --with-cpu=xscale
The XScale cpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, vpcmpeq zmmX, zero and vptestm zmmX, zmmX perform exactly the
opposite, not the same thing, as vpcmpeq sets bits in the %kY register if zmmX
element is equal to 0, while vptestm if it is not equal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86027
--- Comment #2 from Michael Teske ---
Comparing the assembler output got my guess confirmed.
The generated code on 7.3.0 starts with:
.file "comperr.cpp"
.text
.section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86036
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86008
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69615
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 07:37:56 2018
New Revision: 261139
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261139=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69615
* fold-const.c (merge_ranges): If range1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86025
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 07:34:06 2018
New Revision: 261138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261138=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86025
* tree.c (inchash::add_expr): Handle IDENTIFIER_NODE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86025
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 07:27:52 2018
New Revision: 261137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261137=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86025
* tree.c (inchash::add_expr): Handle IDENTIFIER_NODE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85958
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to W E Brown from comment #8)
> (2) For the same reason, the note accompanying the diagnostic might at the
> same time be more accurately rephrased as "initializing parameter 1 of ..."
> instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86036
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
