https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4)
> Adding a nop before the .byte fixes this:
> + if (debug_info_level >= DINFO_LEVEL_TERSE)
> +fputs ("\tnop\n", asm_out_file);
Hmm, this'll probably
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86282
--- Comment #5 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Many thanks for the explanation and the code examples.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86263
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Looking at newlib's "newlib/libc/stdlib/ecvtbuf.c", the diff of
"ecvtbuf.c.040t.switchconv" between before/after the r261793 "Switch other
switch expansion methods into classes" changes is just:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Adding a nop before the .byte fixes this:
...
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index eb77ef3c08f..d088b1e7fe0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85358
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 22 14:19:45 2018
New Revision: 261893
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261893=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-06-22 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86282
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to rene.rahn from comment #2)
> thanks for enlighten me. Before, it wasn't clear to me, that if the nested
> version works, the conjunction does not necessarily.
The magic "does not get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 22 14:11:56 2018
New Revision: 261891
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261891=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-06-22 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86282
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Using std::conjunction:
template
using has_begin2 = std::bool_constant>;
template
struct has_nested_begin
{
// ill-formed unless has_begin is true:
static constexpr bool value =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86282
--- Comment #2 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for enlighten me. Before, it wasn't clear to me, that if the nested
version works, the conjunction does not necessarily.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 22 14:07:11 2018
New Revision: 261890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261890=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-06-22 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86282
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86263
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86282
Bug ID: 86282
Summary: Evaluation order in if constexpr expression seems to
be irrelevant for evaluating type traits
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86186
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84481
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Regarding the generic tuning issue, the difference comes down to the
order of the three instructions at offset 46 in the hottest loop below
(left is fast, right is slow, both along with their perf samples):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86280
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between 20180621 (r261849) and 20180622 (r261880), quite a number of fortran
tests have started
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86280
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 22 13:05:20 2018
New Revision: 261888
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261888=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86280 fix undefined left shift on 32-bit targets
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86280
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86280
Bug ID: 86280
Summary: experimental/memory_resource overflows 32 bit type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86279
Bug ID: 86279
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in malloc_candidate_p, at
ipa-pure-const.c:927
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86279
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Reproducable with trunk gcc and gdb.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86263
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Jun 22 11:32:20 2018
New Revision: 261886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261886=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix emission of jump tables (PR tree-optimization/86263).
2018-06-22 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81589
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> > Confirmed with GCC 6 and 7. GCC 8 compiles the translation unit without an
> > error. Bisection points to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> The question is if this is a problem with recent kernel headers and any
> glibc, or e.g. both latest glibc and 2.27; if yes, then we probably need
> some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81589
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> Confirmed with GCC 6 and 7. GCC 8 compiles the translation unit without an
> error. Bisection points to r248153 as the revision that made it work.
FWIW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Great, thanks very much for checking it and the quick response!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh, also I noticed that __gnu_debug::string probably doesn't work with
_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 because it provides the C++11 API, e.g. insert takes
const_iterator not iterator, and returns non-void. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The right fix might be to just remove the line that causes the error, but I
didn't check to see if we've replaced that macro with something different that
we should be using instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Debug Mode does not use __gnu_debug::string it just disables the explicit
instantation declarations in , so that assertions in std::basic_string
are turned on.
To test __gnu_debug::string we really need a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80682
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The question is if this is a problem with recent kernel headers and any glibc,
or e.g. both latest glibc and 2.27; if yes, then we probably need some
workaround in gcc too. If it is only latest unreleased
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86194
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83257
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83251
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84641
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 84641, which changed state.
Bug 84641 Summary: gcc/ipa-pure-const.c:1951:22: runtime error: load of value
66, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84641
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65566
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82278
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65562
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82656
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82655
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82652
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84193
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83177
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 65564, which changed state.
Bug 65564 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression]
builtin-bnd-narrow-ptr-bounds-2-nov.c:15:1: internal compiler error: in
simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5745
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77383
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 77383, which changed state.
Bug 77383 Summary: -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx ICE with VLA struct return type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77383
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 72815, which changed state.
Bug 72815 Summary: libmpx on i386
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79415, which changed state.
Bug 79415 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] -fcheck-pointer-bounds results in
internal compiler error weakref attributes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79415
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79415
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79765, which changed state.
Bug 79765 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in create_target_clone in multiple_target.c:211
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79765
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79634, which changed state.
Bug 79634 Summary: ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79765
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79763, which changed state.
Bug 79763 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in chkp_find_bounds: Unexpected tree code
real_cst in tree-chkp.c:3681
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79763
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79633, which changed state.
Bug 79633 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3163
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79633
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79787, which changed state.
Bug 79787 Summary: ICE in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:469
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79787
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79633
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80779
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79787
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 80779, which changed state.
Bug 80779 Summary: MPX bootstrap does not work on real hardware supporting that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80779
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69698
Bug 69698 depends on bug 79986, which changed state.
Bug 79986 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression][CHKP] ICE in fold_convert_loc with a
flexible array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #18)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17)
> > Unfortunately I decided to postpone it to GCC 9.x.
>
> GCC 9.x development is ongoing now.
Yes, I've just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79986, which changed state.
Bug 79986 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression][CHKP] ICE in fold_convert_loc with a
flexible array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #18 from Christian Franke ---
With patch from r261873, crash on -std=c++17 does no longer occur with testcase
from comment #3. Same for a wchar_t version of the testcase.
According to objdump -p, executable now imports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
>
> --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
> Using strncpy or strlen to cross subobject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, GCC still claims to support C89, so please cite appropriate C89 wording.
To GCC internals while a direct access like
a.b.c[i].d
has to remain inside bounds the variant via a pointer
p = [i].d;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86278
Bug ID: 86278
Summary: gfortran crashes with internal compiler error:
segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 49630, which changed state.
Bug 49630 Summary: [OOP] ICE on obsolescent deferred-length type bound
character function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jun 22 06:22:14 2018
New Revision: 261881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261881=gcc=rev
Log:
Don't preprocess .S files with -P on Solaris/x86 (PR target/85994)
PR
101 - 200 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
