https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86298
Bug ID: 86298
Summary: template argument cannot be narrowed to type 'int'
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86297
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
This is the error message from gfortran:
Error: 'p' at (1) must have the same number of formal arguments as the
overridden procedure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86297
Bug ID: 86297
Summary: rejects valid code on type extension
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #14)
> > You say that
> >
> > struct { int a; int b; } s, s2;
> > memcpy (, , sizeof (s));
> >
> > is invalid, aka not copying the whole structure since you pass in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86296
Bug ID: 86296
Summary: Creating a pointer class for a unique_ptr<>() deleter
fails with optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86295
Bug ID: 86295
Summary: Missing exception safety when inserting range into
vector
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71220
rippey.e at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
> You say that
>
> struct { int a; int b; } s, s2;
> memcpy (, , sizeof (s));
>
> is invalid, aka not copying the whole structure since you pass in a
> pointer to s2.a rather than s2?
Yes. It's invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82373
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82507
--- Comment #1 from Casey Carter ---
Gentle ping: working around this bug is making it incredibly hard to prototype
the Ranges design for C++20.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85068
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85140
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85208
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86136
--- Comment #3 from MCCCS ---
What about
unsigned int k (unsigned int a) {
if (a > 5) {
__builtin_unreachable();
}
return (a * 83) % 5;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86256
--- Comment #4 from kangchuanbo at 126 dot com ---
OK, thanks for your response, I just met this issue and think it's better to
give warn or error when Lambda capture this or reference with std::shared_ptr
member inside.
So add one Lambda usage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71612
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86292
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
22 matches
Mail list logo
