[Bug bootstrap/37704] RFE: Need specific version of --disable-multilib

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37704 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Severity|normal

[Bug target/69179] undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to sandra from comment #0) > > config/darwin.c defines attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and > > "weak_import" which have no documentation in the GCC

[Bug c/60440] Bogus -Wreturn-type warning after error

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Thanks for CC. Patches are currently under review. > About this PR: as 'b' is undeclared, the whole statement with the expression > is ignored and we have: > >

[Bug other/36994] gcc/makefile contains one very long line (over 2k)

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/86552] missing warning for reading past the end of non-string arrays

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86552 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 44407 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44407=edit Preliminary patch. Lightly tested patch to apply on top of the one for bug 86532.

[Bug c++/86583] New: exception specification of explicitly defaulted destructor does not match the calculated one

2018-07-18 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86583 Bug ID: 86583 Summary: exception specification of explicitly defaulted destructor does not match the calculated one Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/86578] requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent

2018-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/86582] New: [debug] vla size reported as 0 at Og

2018-07-18 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86582 Bug ID: 86582 Summary: [debug] vla size reported as 0 at Og Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/86578] requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent

2018-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86578 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17743 GCC 4.3.x and above support this feature.

[Bug c++/86581] New: constexpr variable is not checked

2018-07-18 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86581 Bug ID: 86581 Summary: constexpr variable is not checked Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/86580] New: No warning for default arguments

2018-07-18 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86580 Bug ID: 86580 Summary: No warning for default arguments Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Both. It's been low priority because I noticed it by observation, but it's never been reported by users or caused any problems that I'm aware of (until now, maybe).

[Bug c++/86579] New: invalid operands to binary expression

2018-07-18 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86579 Bug ID: 86579 Summary: invalid operands to binary expression Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/86578] New: requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent

2018-07-18 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86578 Bug ID: 86578 Summary: requested alignment is dependent but declaration is not dependent Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86577] New: non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time?

2018-07-18 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86577 Bug ID: 86577 Summary: non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time? Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86414] AIX generates wrong for divide and multiply for KC mode

2018-07-18 Thread carll at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Carl Love ---

[Bug target/86414] AIX generates wrong for divide and multiply for KC mode

2018-07-18 Thread carll at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86544] Popcount detection generates different code on C and C++

2018-07-18 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86544 --- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Wed Jul 18 22:11:24 2018 New Revision: 262864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262864=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-07-18 Kugan Vivekanandarajah PR

[Bug target/86414] AIX generates wrong for divide and multiply for KC mode

2018-07-18 Thread carll at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86414 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- Author: carll Date: Wed Jul 18 22:12:20 2018 New Revision: 262865 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262865=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2018-07-18 Carl Love Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/86576] New: [F03][OOP] Sourced allocation of object array fails with SEGFAULT

2018-07-18 Thread c...@mnet-mail.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86576 Bug ID: 86576 Summary: [F03][OOP] Sourced allocation of object array fails with SEGFAULT Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

2018-07-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > As noted already somewhere in the discussion of PR85599 on the mailing list, > this breaks actual_pointer_function_1.f90 in the testsuite ... but apart from

[Bug c++/86469] Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846).

2018-07-18 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469 --- Comment #15 from Jonny Grant --- Hi Richard I cannot reproduce DWARF errors without undefined references (by removing the implementation of a function). It is taking me a long time to reduce and still keep the error Which has different

[Bug c++/86550] Lambda parsing allows arbitrary types in decl-specifier-seq

2018-07-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86550 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jul 18 21:01:54 2018 New Revision: 262862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262862=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86550 * parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Diagnose

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

2018-07-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85599] warn about short-circuiting of logical expressions for non-pure functions

2018-07-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug go/86535] FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for gcc 7.3.0 fails

2018-07-18 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535 --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Sorry, you're right, it's -fdump-go-spec.

[Bug c++/86574] ICE on std::prev with ranges::view::transform

2018-07-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86574 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/86535] FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for gcc 7.3.0 fails

2018-07-18 Thread clhamilto at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535 --- Comment #10 from Curtis Hamilton --- Is it -fgo-dump-spec or -fdump-go-spec? Below is an extract of my build log: checking for hypotf... /usr/ports/lang/gcc7/work/.build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ports/lang/gcc7/work/.build/./gcc/

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #11 from The Written Word --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > As I suspected, something is doing: > > #define fabsl(X) fabs((double) (X)) > #define acosl(X) acos((double) (X)) > etc. > > This would probably be

[Bug go/86535] FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for gcc 7.3.0 fails

2018-07-18 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535 --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I haven't tried to recreate the problem on FreeBSD. I've just tried various inputs to GCC 7 -fgo-dump-spec.

[Bug bootstrap/86518] Strengthen bootstrap comparison by not enabling warnings at stage3

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov --- One more: -Wimplicit-fallthrough issue uncovered by the testsuite: PR 86575. So far all issues appeared in gcc-6 or more recent.

[Bug c/69558] [6/7/8/9 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

2018-07-18 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 --- Comment #25 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Jul 18 19:36:01 2018 New Revision: 262861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262861=gcc=rev Log: libcpp: 2018-07-18 Bernd Edlinger PR 69558 * macro.c

[Bug go/86535] FreeBSD/PowerPC64 - Building Go Frontend support for gcc 7.3.0 fails

2018-07-18 Thread clhamilto at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535 --- Comment #8 from Curtis Hamilton --- Based on you last comment, I attempted a build using FreeBSD 11.2 RC1 on the same hardware (PowerMac G5 Quad) and got the same results. Are you using native hardware or emulation?

[Bug tree-optimization/86570] Conditional statement doesn't trigger sincos transform (with -ffast-math)

2018-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86570 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/86573] Failure to optimise passing simple values to inlined function

2018-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86573 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/86575] New: -Wimplicit-fallthrough affects code generation

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86575 Bug ID: 86575 Summary: -Wimplicit-fallthrough affects code generation Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/86573] Failure to optimise passing simple values to inlined function

2018-07-18 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86573 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- When passing by copy, gcc seems to manage with default flags, but your -std=c++2a -fno-exceptions hinder it somehow.

[Bug c++/86574] New: ICE on std::prev with ranges::view::transform

2018-07-18 Thread tower120 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86574 Bug ID: 86574 Summary: ICE on std::prev with ranges::view::transform Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/86573] Failure to optimise passing simple values to inlined function

2018-07-18 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86573 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Try renaming 'main' to any other name and gcc does optimize...

[Bug bootstrap/81397] mistakes in .opt files not detected

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81397 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/86532] [9 Regression] Wrong code due to a wrong strlen folding starting with r262522

2018-07-18 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532 --- Comment #28 from Bernd Edlinger --- Yes, agreed. Should I send a patch to take out the statement in comment #17, or will you do that in your follow-up patch?

[Bug c++/86573] New: Failure to optimise passing simple values to inlined function

2018-07-18 Thread s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86573 Bug ID: 86573 Summary: Failure to optimise passing simple values to inlined function Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86569] -Wnonnull-compare affects code generation

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86569 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86571] AIX NaNQ and NaNS output format conflicts with __builtin_sprintf

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/85599] warn about short-circuiting of logical expressions for non-pure functions

2018-07-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 --- Comment #37 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Jul 18 18:31:59 2018 New Revision: 262860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262860=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-18 Janus Weil Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug tree-optimization/86532] [9 Regression] Wrong code due to a wrong strlen folding starting with r262522

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532 --- Comment #27 from Martin Sebor --- I don't think it would be appropriate to introduce dependencies on the sanitizer for the same reason we can't do that for warnings. But as I mentioned in comment 16, I think performing these sorts of

[Bug c++/86469] Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846).

2018-07-18 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469 --- Comment #14 from Jonny Grant --- Hello Richard My archive of the original problem didn't show it. But when I tried to re-create I got the following. I'll try also make a small test case for this one while I have it.

[Bug tree-optimization/86572] unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/86572] New: unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572 Bug ID: 86572 Summary: unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/86571] AIX NaNQ and NaNS output format conflicts with __builtin_sprintf

2018-07-18 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86571] New: AIX NaNQ and NaNS output format conflicts with __builtin_sprintf

2018-07-18 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571 Bug ID: 86571 Summary: AIX NaNQ and NaNS output format conflicts with __builtin_sprintf Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/86570] New: Conditional statement doesn't trigger sincos transform

2018-07-18 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86570 Bug ID: 86570 Summary: Conditional statement doesn't trigger sincos transform Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/85602] -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncat with size of source

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85602 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Jul 18 17:20:05 2018 New Revision: 262859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262859=gcc=rev Log: Backport from trunk. PR middle-end/85602 - -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncat

[Bug fortran/86566] The preprocessor cpp6 loses line concatenation on FreeBSD

2018-07-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86566 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- The proper way to preprocess Fortran code is with the Fortran compiler. You can and should use 'gfortran -cpp'. See the documentation that comes with your compiler. If you think you need to use

[Bug target/86555] unaligned address for ldrd/strd on armv5e

2018-07-18 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86555 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #5

[Bug bootstrap/86518] Strengthen bootstrap comparison by not enabling warnings at stage3

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov --- Other files seem to miscompare due to -Wnonnull-compare: PR 86569.

[Bug c++/86569] New: -Wnonnull-compare affects code generation

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86569 Bug ID: 86569 Summary: -Wnonnull-compare affects code generation Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/59480] Missing error diagnostic: friend declaration specifying a default argument must be a definition

2018-07-18 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, I needed far more than that. Obviously I needed the right versions of autoconf and automake first in my PATH, which is simple. But I also needed to use contrib/gcc_update to fix all the timestamps, so

[Bug c++/86568] New: -Wnonnull warnings should highlight the relevant argument not the closing parenthesis

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86568 Bug ID: 86568 Summary: -Wnonnull warnings should highlight the relevant argument not the closing parenthesis Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/86555] unaligned address for ldrd/strd on armv5e

2018-07-18 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86555 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Khem Raj from comment #2) > we can avoid the problem by altering the structure, thats not an issue, but > do you think compiler is right here by assuming to generate LDRD on a 4byte >

[Bug target/86555] unaligned address for ldrd/strd on armv5e

2018-07-18 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86555 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug bootstrap/86518] Strengthen bootstrap comparison by not enabling warnings at stage3

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov --- cp/mangle.o miscompares due to -Wsign-compare, possibly due to caching in maybe_constant_value as in the above PR.

[Bug c++/86567] [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation

2018-07-18 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86567 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86555] unaligned address for ldrd/strd on armv5e

2018-07-18 Thread raj.khem at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86555 --- Comment #2 from Khem Raj --- we can avoid the problem by altering the structure, thats not an issue, but do you think compiler is right here by assuming to generate LDRD on a 4byte aligned address when it is told that architecture

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 --- Comment #9 from The Written Word --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #7) > I use GCC 4.6 to bootstrap. It appears that the error is caused by the > "system" bootstrap compiler, which I think is GCC 4.4 in your case. It is >

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 --- Comment #8 from The Written Word --- (In reply to The Written Word from comment #6) > gcc-5.5.0 and 7.2.0 errored out in the same way but I am able to build > gcc-8.1.0 successfully. gcc-6.4.0 seems to have built insn-output.c >

[Bug c++/64867] warning for passing non-POD to varargs function

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

2018-07-18 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- I use GCC 4.6 to bootstrap. It appears that the error is caused by the "system" bootstrap compiler, which I think is GCC 4.4 in your case. It is generating code with too large displacements. Also, some of

[Bug c++/86562] Missing warning (error in C++11) for passing nontrivial object to varargs function via function pointer

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86562 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/64867] warning for passing non-POD to varargs function

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/86562] Missing warning (error in C++11) for passing nontrivial object to varargs function via function pointer

2018-07-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86562 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 --- Comment #6 from The Written Word --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5) > GCC 4.9 is quite old now and out of service. If there is a bug in GCC 4.9, > it will not be fixed because there are no bug fix releases planned.

[Bug middle-end/86554] [7/8/9 Regression] Incorrect code generation with signed/unsigned comparison

2018-07-18 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86554 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Anton has been able to work around the problem with a source change (this code is unnecessarily baroque anyway), so I don't think anybody is urgently awaiting a fix. If this will be fixed in your eventual

[Bug c++/86480] [8/9 Regression] error: parameter packs not expanded with '...' in a recursive variadic lambda

2018-07-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86480 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86480] [8/9 Regression] error: parameter packs not expanded with '...' in a recursive variadic lambda

2018-07-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86480 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 18 13:42:02 2018 New Revision: 262858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262858=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86480 - nested variadic lambda and constexpr if. * pt.c

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #10 from The Written Word --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > Created attachment 44406 [details] > Undefine macros for long double math functions > > Does this fix the build? I am trying a similar patch. I

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #9 from The Written Word --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > As I suspected, something is doing: > > #define fabsl(X) fabs((double) (X)) > #define acosl(X) acos((double) (X)) > etc. /usr/include/math.h on this

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

2018-07-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression]|[6/7/8 Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 44406 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44406=edit Undefine macros for long double math functions Does this fix the build? This isn't really a proper fix, as it just

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

2018-07-18 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn --- GCC 4.9 is quite old now and out of service. If there is a bug in GCC 4.9, it will not be fixed because there are no bug fix releases planned. You never showed an example of the assembly line representing

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- As I suspected, something is doing: #define fabsl(X) fabs((double) (X)) #define acosl(X) acos((double) (X)) etc. This would probably be solved by any fix for PR 79700, which would have to add this to :

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 --- Comment #4 from The Written Word --- (In reply to The Written Word from comment #3) > (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #2) > > Group Bull, Perzl, and I have been able to build it. Are you using an up to > > date AIX Assembler? > >

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

2018-07-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jul 18 13:13:11 2018 New Revision: 262855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262855=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86190 - bogus -Wsign-conversion warning * typeck.c

[Bug bootstrap/86559] Build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86559 --- Comment #3 from The Written Word --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > (In reply to The Written Word from comment #1) > > Might be a duplicate of PR64081. > > Wrong bug number? I was looking at bug 64081 comment 31.

[Bug target/86560] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/swapcontext-test-1.c

2018-07-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86560 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_

[Bug c++/86563] catch reference to incomplete type

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86563 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86557] missed vectorization with std::vector compared to icc 18

2018-07-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86557 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 18 12:57:15 2018 New Revision: 262854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262854=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-18 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/86557 *

[Bug libstdc++/86553] libstdc++-v3 build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553 --- Comment #5 from The Written Word --- Created attachment 44405 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44405=edit Preprocessed source for math_stubs_long_double.cc

[Bug c++/86561] a function definition must occur in a standalone declaration

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86561 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84100] [7 Regression] Function __attribute__((optimize(align-loops=32))) gives spurious warning and is ignored

2018-07-18 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84100 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/45996] -falign-functions=X does not work

2018-07-18 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86562] Missing warning (error in C++11) for passing nontrivial object to varargs function via function pointer

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86562 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/86471] GCC/libstdc++ outputs inferior code for std::fill and std::fill_n vs std::memset on c-style arrays

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- Surely static_cast is good enough, and doesn't rule out making the function constexpr?

[Bug c++/86567] [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation

2018-07-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86567 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.1.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/86559] Build failure on AIX 5.3

2018-07-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86559 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to The Written Word from comment #1) > Might be a duplicate of PR64081. Wrong bug number? You might need -mcmodel=large

[Bug bootstrap/86518] Strengthen bootstrap comparison by not enabling warnings at stage3

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov --- GCC 7 sadly has a similar list of miscomparing files. Did not check GCC 6 yet. So far I managed to catch one set of misbehaving warnings by checking testsuite fallout with -fcompare-debug=-Wall, but

[Bug c++/86567] New: [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation

2018-07-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86567 Bug ID: 86567 Summary: [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/38935] Openmp reduction with - (minus) does not produce correct result

2018-07-18 Thread subc2 at wp dot pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935 --- Comment #2 from Paweł Zacharek --- GCC behaves correctly, according to OpenMP 4.0 (https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP4.0.0.pdf#page=175) and OpenMP 4.5 (https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-4.5.pdf#page=211)

  1   2   >