[Bug middle-end/86711] [9 Regression] wrong folding of memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86711 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/86714] tree-ssa-forwprop.c confused by too long initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86714 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/86826] New: deduction fails on auto-returning function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86826 Bug ID: 86826 Summary: deduction fails on auto-returning function template Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/86820] [8 regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Yes, I can confirm that the patch from comment #2 fixes the problem for me. (sid-m68k-sbuild)root@epyc:/binutils/binutils-gdb# ls -l /tmp/json2yaml -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43823968 Aug 2 01:53

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #10) > Author: law > Date: Wed May 2 17:22:26 2018 > New Revision: 259849 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259849=gcc=rev > Log: > PR c/30552 >

[Bug c++/86825] New: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem10.C test fails on windows targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86825 Bug ID: 86825 Summary: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem10.C test fails on windows targets Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/86714] tree-ssa-forwprop.c confused by too long initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86714 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/86711] [9 Regression] wrong folding of memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86711 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/86824] [9 Regression] internal compiler error: in replace_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.c:611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86824 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86824] [9 Regression] internal compiler error: in replace_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.c:611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86824 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdsandiford at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/84823] [6 Regression] x86 LRA hang on valid code (no ICE) with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823 --- Comment #5 from A. Wilcox (awilfox) --- Created attachment 44483 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44483=edit more preprocessed source that fails % gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"

[Bug middle-end/84823] [6 Regression] x86 LRA hang on valid code (no ICE) with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823 --- Comment #4 from A. Wilcox (awilfox) --- Even with -fno-guess-branch-probability (which is what we have put on our x86 builders so they run at all), rrdtool-1.7.0's rrd_resize.c has managed to make the same lock happen yet again. The only

[Bug fortran/80256] Cygwin test fail: bind_c_array_params_2.f90 scan-assembler-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80256 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added Target|*-*-cygwin |*-*-cygwin *-*-mingw*

[Bug tree-optimization/86650] -Warray-bounds missing inlining context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86650 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Aug 1 23:39:35 2018 New Revision: 263239 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263239=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/86650 - -Warray-bounds missing inlining context

[Bug target/86448] GCC 9 compiler generates slower code for spec 2006 milc on a power9 using -mcpu=power9 than using -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- The options I use for spec are: -O3 -fpeel-loops -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize -fvect-cost-model -msave-toc-indirect -mno-pointers-to-nested-functions -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations -ffast-math

[Bug tree-optimization/86824] New: [9 Regression] internal compiler error: in replace_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.c:611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86824 Bug ID: 86824 Summary: [9 Regression] internal compiler error: in replace_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.c:611 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/86472] allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 --- Comment #6 from Jim Feng --- 't' is a local variable of myfunc1. If I change to following: Module M1 implicit none type :: mytype contains procedure ::

[Bug ada/86211] GCC 8 ada cannot build GCC 7 ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86211 John Marino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnugcc at marino dot st --- Comment #4

[Bug target/86770] UNRESOLVED: 30_threads/call_once/call_once1.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86770 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86819] Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #5) > Note that your code compares throughput. A microbenchmark for comparing > latency would chain dependent computations, e.g. like this: Ok, the 2 divisions

[Bug target/86819] Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) > But unless your FPU can do 2 divisions in parallel, you have to take into > account the delay before a second division can start (related to > throughput),

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 1 20:06:54 2018 New Revision: 263237 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263237=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86190 - bogus -Wsign-conversion warning * typeck.c

[Bug c++/80744] Detect Divide By Zero and give a warning in C/C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/80619] bad fix-it hint for GCC %lu directive with int argument: %wu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/80383] wrong caret location and missing detail in warning: initializer element is not a constant expression on a signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80383 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > > I tried testing this but it looks like the -Wshift-overflow=2 option has > broken; I'll have to open a separate bug about that: > > $ /usr/local/bin/gcc -c

[Bug bootstrap/86739] [9 Regression] Bootstrap broken with host GCC 4.1.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > ISTR figuring the default hash_map<> template resolution is a bit tricky. ISTR thinking it was rather overcomplicated.

[Bug c++/86823] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] private member template struct/class is publicly accessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823 Bug ID: 86823 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] private member template struct/class is publicly accessible Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/86819] Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > I think there may be realistic situations where the change can introduce a > regression: while a win throughput-wise, it introduces one multiplication >

[Bug c++/86767] [6/7/8/9 Regression] continue statements in constexpr functions causes unbounded looping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86767 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/86767] [6/7/8/9 Regression] continue statements in constexpr functions causes unbounded looping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86767 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/86608] [6/7/8/9 Regression] volatile variable is taken as a constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86608 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Hmm, but I'm not happy about the error it produces, better use non_const_var_error somehow.

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 1 18:17:29 2018 New Revision: 263231 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263231=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/86759 * tsan/tsan_platform.h: Cherry-pick compiler-rt

[Bug target/86802] riscv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86802 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/23383] builtin array operator new is not marked with malloc attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 --- Comment #27 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0) > the return is not turned into 1 It is now. I didn't check since when.

[Bug target/86820] [8 regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.3 Summary|[8, regression]

[Bug middle-end/86815] [8 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug libstdc++/86822] attribute((malloc)) for new(nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86822 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to also PR 23383 .

[Bug target/86819] Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- Right, sorry, somehow I imagined the hook has to do with instructions for computing approximate inverse. Indeed the two aspects are independent. I think there may be realistic situations where the

[Bug testsuite/86405] UNRESOLVED bb-slp-over-widen-1.c and -2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86405 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/86506] [9 Regression] tree-vect-patterns.c:225: shift too large for type ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86506 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/86786] ia64 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86786 --- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson --- I no longer have access to ia64 hardware, and don't plan to do anything about this.

[Bug target/86819] Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- There are 2 independent things. TARGET_MIN_DIVISIONS_FOR_RECIP_MUL controls replacing several divisions with the same divisor (a/x, b/x, c/x) with one division (y=1/x) and several multiplications (a*y, b*y,

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 1 17:17:29 2018 New Revision: 263229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263229=gcc=rev Log: Cherry-pick compiler-rt revision 318044 and 319180. [PowerPC][tsan] Update

[Bug target/86819] Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/86774] Alpha port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86774 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86753] [9 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/vcond_[45].c fail after recent combine patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86753 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Aug 1 16:00:05 2018 New Revision: 263227 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263227=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] XFAIL sve/vcond_[45].c tests See PR 86753 for details.

[Bug fortran/86472] allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Having now checked the standard, I have come to the belief that your expectation that 't' will be associated in the procedure 'myfunc1' is incorrect. F2008 12.4.3.2 note 6 says: "An interface body specifies

[Bug target/85075] powerpc: ICE in iszero testcase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85075 Rajalakshmi S changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #6 from

[Bug libstdc++/86822] attribute((malloc)) for new(nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86822 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86808] tilegx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86808 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Given that both tilegx and tilepro only support *-linux* targets and the Linux kernel has removed support for those architectures, we might consider obsoleting those ports (as previously

[Bug libstdc++/60555] std::system_category().default_error_condition() doesn't map system errno values to std::generic_category()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555 --- Comment #12 from Niall Douglas --- Excellent. Thanks guys!

[Bug target/86758] [9 Regression] ICE in replace_stmt compiling gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86758 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/86820] [8, regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2) > Does this help > ? Thanks. Rebuilding gcc-8 with the patch applied now, will report back

[Bug tree-optimization/86749] [9 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 with sse4 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86749 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/86748] Terminates abnormally without error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86748 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Aug 1 15:29:36 2018 New Revision: 263222 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263222=gcc=rev Log: Fix remove_stmt in vectorizable_simd_clone_call (PR 86758)

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- We actually also need commit 4b8cb24bb7cf820f095b20edaa5812d4b78189a4 Author: Bill Seurer Date: Tue Nov 28 16:28:54 2017 + [PowerPC][tsan] Update tsan to handle changed memory layouts in newer

[Bug libstdc++/86822] New: attribute((malloc)) for new(nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86822 Bug ID: 86822 Summary: attribute((malloc)) for new(nothrow) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/86768] gcc wrongly decides that variable is <=1 after "while (x>1 && blah)" construct.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86768 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, the warnings are issued by call expansion. In past reports like this one Jeff has made the argument that warning for such code is appropriate (e.g., pr82103 comment 4) or that it highlights missed

[Bug target/86820] [8, regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Does this help ?

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/86821] New: std::system_category() should map EDEADLOCK to EDEADLK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86821 Bug ID: 86821 Summary: std::system_category() should map EDEADLOCK to EDEADLK Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/86820] [8, regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Related (invalid) binutils bug report: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471

[Bug target/86820] New: [8, regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 Bug ID: 86820 Summary: [8, regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 URL: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471 Status:

[Bug c++/86818] injected-class-name interpreted as type instead of constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86818 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug debug/86687] Wrong debug information for string types passed as parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687 --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Nikolay Piskun from comment #12) > Great work, thanks. Will this fix propagate to other branches? Patch was OK-ed for "trunk and also for branches after a while".

[Bug tree-optimization/86749] [9 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 with sse4 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86749 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Aug 1 14:40:35 2018 New Revision: 263213 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263213=gcc=rev Log: Fix over-widening handling of COND_EXPRs (PR 86749) This PR is a

[Bug target/86819] New: Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86819 Bug ID: 86819 Summary: Set min_divisions_for_recip_mul to 2 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug debug/86687] Wrong debug information for string types passed as parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687 --- Comment #12 from Nikolay Piskun --- Great work, thanks. Will this fix propagate to other branches?

[Bug c++/86818] New: injected-class-name interpreted as type instead of constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86818 Bug ID: 86818 Summary: injected-class-name interpreted as type instead of constructor Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/60555] std::system_category().default_error_condition() doesn't map system errno values to std::generic_category()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-03-18 00:00:00 |2018-8-1 --- Comment #11 from

[Bug c++/86469] Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug libstdc++/60555] std::system_category().default_error_condition() doesn't map system errno values to std::generic_category()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Aug 1 13:57:05 2018 New Revision: 263210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263210=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60555 std::system_category() should recognise POSIX errno values

[Bug gcov-profile/86817] [8/9 Regression] Misleading warning in gcov since r254672

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86817 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/86817] New: [8/9 Regression] Misleading warning in gcov since r254672

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86817 Bug ID: 86817 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Misleading warning in gcov since r254672 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/28564] gcov fails to store the absolute path to the source files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28564 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/83877] Make gcov accept a path to the gcda and a path to the gcno file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83877 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #5 from Gianfranco --- working one: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/9/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug debug/63572] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICF breaks user debugging experience

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/86816] New: [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree-ssa-pre / tail_merge_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816 Bug ID: 86816 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree-ssa-pre / tail_merge_optimize Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86800, which changed state. Bug 86800 Summary: nvptx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86800 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86800] nvptx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86800 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86800] nvptx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86800 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed Aug 1 13:20:32 2018 New Revision: 263209 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263209=gcc=rev Log: [nvptx] Define TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE 2018-08-01 Tom de Vries

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think we can just cherry-pick that to trunk and perhaps 8.3 too (for full merge from libsanitizer I'd rather wait for later, say October).

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) > can you please provide the output of the gcc -v command so we can see what > GCC configuration you're using Sorry! I was going to attach it, but forgot :) gcc -v Using

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- can you please provide the output of the gcc -v command so we can see what GCC configuration you're using

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 44480 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44480=edit preprocessed source with buggy gcc-8

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 44479 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44479=edit working preprocessed-source with gcc-9 snapshot

[Bug c++/86815] New: [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Bug ID: 86815 Summary: [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/86814] New: xtensa port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86814 Bug ID: 86814 Summary: xtensa port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/86813] New: xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813 Bug ID: 86813 Summary: xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/86812] New: visium port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86812 Bug ID: 86812 Summary: visium port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/86811] New: Vax port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86811 Bug ID: 86811 Summary: Vax port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/86810] New: v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810 Bug ID: 86810 Summary: v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/86809] New: tilepro port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86809 Bug ID: 86809 Summary: tilepro port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/86759] ThreadSanitizer: unsupported VMA range on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86759 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/86153] [8/9 regression] test case g++.dg/pr83239.C fails starting with r261585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|missed-optimization | Target|powerpc64*-*-*

[Bug c++/86661] g++ ICE:tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in note_name_declared_in_class, at cp/class.c:8288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86661 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/86661] [9 Regression] g++ ICE:tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in note_name_declared_in_class, at cp/class.c:8288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86661 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Aug 1 12:09:33 2018 New Revision: 263207 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263207=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-08-01 Paolo Carlini PR c++/86661 * class.c

  1   2   >