https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86889
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86503
--- Comment #3 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You run out of memory or stack. Try ulimit -s unlimited
I tried ulimit -s unlimited. This time, the error messages are as follows:
g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86894
Bug ID: 86894
Summary: error for a zero-length array initialized with empty
braced list
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So what is wrong about that? CONST_INTs are sign-extended always, so
0xff00 is just fine?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
Author: schwab
Date: Wed Aug 8 20:01:26 2018
New Revision: 263432
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263432=gcc=rev
Log:
m68k: handle more cases of TLS symbols with offset
PR target/46179
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86893
Bug ID: 86893
Summary: implement F202x .andthen. / .orelse. operators
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #6)
> +;; Widest single word integer modes.
> +(define_mode_iterator SWI48W [(SI "!TARGET_64BIT")
> + (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
Please use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651
--- Comment #17 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
If anyone opens a new PR, please cc me. I am unable to contribute right now due
to some health issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892
Bug ID: 86892
Summary: RTL CSE commoning trivial constants across call
and/or too early
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
ead model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180808 (experimental) (GCC)
The generated code:
main:
stp x29, x30, [sp, -32]!//,,,
mov x29, sp //,
// testcase.c:11: u32 d = 7;
mov w0, 7 // tmp106,
str w0, [sp, 28]// tmp106, d
// testcase.c:12:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86724
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freddie_chopin at op dot pl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83982
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 16:31:55 2018
New Revision: 263427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263427=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83982 fix exception-safety guarantee of std::vector::resize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83982
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448
--- Comment #6 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I should also clarify regarding all of the above comments that the numbers I
have been reporting are the spec ratios. I had misunderstood that these ratios
were encoded such that smaller values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 86493, which changed state.
Bug 86493 Summary: [concepts] Hard error for "call to non-'constexpr' function"
in a requires expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86493
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86493
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86292
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86597
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:47 2018
New Revision: 263421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263421=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80893 Fix null dereference in vector
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:41 2018
New Revision: 263420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263420=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68519 use native duration to avoid rounding errors
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:26 2018
New Revision: 263417
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263417=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60555 std::system_category() should recognise POSIX errno values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86734
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:21 2018
New Revision: 263416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263416=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86734 use addressof in reverse_iterator::operator->
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86292
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:37 2018
New Revision: 263419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86292 fix exception safety of std::vector
constructor
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> combine creates a clobber of const_int 0 to make sure a pattern will
> not match. That is valid RTL, but further patterns constructed from
> that are not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:11 2018
New Revision: 263414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263414=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66145 allow catching iostream errors as cxx11 ios::failure
Define a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:40:11 2018
New Revision: 263414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263414=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66145 allow catching iostream errors as cxx11 ios::failure
Define a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86597
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:33:32 2018
New Revision: 263412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263412=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86597 directory_entry observers should clear error_code
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86767
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86767
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Aug 8 15:30:50 2018
New Revision: 263410
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263410=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86767
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_statement_list): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84332
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79895
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86890
--- Comment #2 from Freddie Chopin ---
Prerequisites docs say "isl Library version 0.15 or later". Configure script
also accepts 0.20 just fine.
BTW - 0.19 builds and works OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85295
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86890
--- Comment #1 from graham.stott77 at gmail dot com ---
isl 0.18 is the supported version for gcc 8 branch.
Original message
From: freddie_chopin at op dot pl
Date: 08/08/2018 16:04 (GMT+00:00)
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
isl 0.18 is the supported version for gcc 8 branch.
Original message
From: freddie_chopin at op dot pl
Date: 08/08/2018 16:04 (GMT+00:00)
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/86890] New: GCC 8.2.0 fails to build with isl 0.20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83420
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83420
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86890
Bug ID: 86890
Summary: GCC 8.2.0 fails to build with isl 0.20
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448
--- Comment #5 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I apologize for an error in the previous comment. The two columns should have
been labeled -mcpu=power8 (left) and -mcpu=power9 (right) instead of gcc8 and
gcc9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
combine creates a clobber of const_int 0 to make sure a pattern will
not match. That is valid RTL, but further patterns constructed from
that are not (clobber on a rhs).
The upper bits of a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #63 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Just wanted to ask whether there is an updated patch available for testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86889
Bug ID: 86889
Summary: s390x gcc build fails when configured with
--disable-checking
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86887
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86597
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 8 13:09:19 2018
New Revision: 263397
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263397=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86597 directory_entry observers should clear error_code
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86597
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86887
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85295
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Aug 8 12:38:51 2018
New Revision: 263396
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263396=gcc=rev
Log:
S/390: Fix PR85295
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-08-08 Andreas Krebbel
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86888
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Draft patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 263395)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (working copy)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86888
Bug ID: 86888
Summary: [F08] allocatable components of indirectly recursive
type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
get=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
--with-ld=/usr/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-263387-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180808 (experimental) (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you want to play these sort of games then you need to compile with
-fno-strict-aliasing (which you should have tried anyway if you'd read
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ first)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Your second example has undefined behaviour, as you blatantly violate the
strict aliasing rules, and -Wstrict-aliasing=2 will warn you about it:
86886.c:5:1: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
--- Comment #2 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't think this is a bug. You are taking the address of a field of an
> union and accessing via that address. This is not tracked at all.
Here is a reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86885
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Aug 8 08:32:51 2018
New Revision: 263391
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263391=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86836
* pt.c (tsubst_expr): For structured bindings, call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86738
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Aug 8 08:31:40 2018
New Revision: 263390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263390=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86738
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_binary_expression): For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
--- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani ---
Looking good for my use-cases, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is a bug. You are taking the address of a field of an union
and accessing via that address. This is not tracked at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
Bug ID: 86886
Summary: Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Also suspicious combine transformation before the failure:
Trying 10, 11 -> 13:
10: r94:SI=zero_extend(r92:QI)
11: {r95:SI=r94:SI^0x101;clobber flags:CC;}
REG_DEAD r94:SI
REG_UNUSED flags:CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
74 matches
Mail list logo
