[Bug c++/86971] New: -Wabi warns it will not warn about anything.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86971 Bug ID: 86971 Summary: -Wabi warns it will not warn about anything. Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/86970] New: Rejected constexpr expression involving lambdas and inheritance, "use of this in a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970 Bug ID: 86970 Summary: Rejected constexpr expression involving lambdas and inheritance, "use of this in a constant expression" Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status:

[Bug c++/83428] Static initialization and struct with constexpr ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83428 Aliaksei Kandratsenka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alkondratenko at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/86969] New: [Regression] ICE (in tsubst_copy) for a generic recursive lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86969 Bug ID: 86969 Summary: [Regression] ICE (in tsubst_copy) for a generic recursive lambda Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/86968] Unaligned big-endian (scalar_storage_order) access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unaligned big-endian access |Unaligned big-endian

[Bug c/86968] Unaligned big-endian access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968 --- Comment #1 from Sven --- Created attachment 44548 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44548=edit the generated assembler code

[Bug c/86968] New: Unaligned big-endian access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968 Bug ID: 86968 Summary: Unaligned big-endian access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/85367] [GCOV] A call to the _subborrow_u64 builtin-function is wrongly marked as executed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85367 Yibiao Yang changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Yibiao

[Bug c++/86961] ICE in finish_member_declaration when an alias template is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86961 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Reshetnikov --- Might be related to Bug 86956 and Bug 86959.

[Bug c++/86960] [Regression] internal compiler error: in coerce_template_parms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Reshetnikov --- Also, might be related to Bug 84796 and Bug 86961.

[Bug c++/86966] ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit specialization of a member class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Reshetnikov --- Also, might be related to Bug 84796.

[Bug libstdc++/86967] New: time_get fails to parse abbreviated weekday with %A format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86967 Bug ID: 86967 Summary: time_get fails to parse abbreviated weekday with %A format string Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug c++/83428] Static initialization and struct with constexpr ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83428 Matt Morehouse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mascasa at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/80076] -Wmisleading-indentation doesn't trigger when macro is misindented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80076 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug translation/79997] simple-ssa-sprintf i18n: wrong plural form in maybe_warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/86941] ICE in i386/winnt.c:1258 in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86941 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] [8/9 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at ispras dot ru --- Comment

[Bug fortran/86945] BUG with optimisation of select case statement in gfortran v8.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86945 --- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #3) > Self contained alternative testcase: > With -Og, -O1 and higher: > > id= 1 > ierr1, OK =0 T > ierr2, OK =1 F The magic

[Bug c++/86942] A trailing-return-type is allowed when the return type is not 'auto' for using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86966] ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit specialization of a member class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Reshetnikov --- Might be related to Bug 86960 and Bug 86918.

[Bug c++/70693] valgrind error in get_visual_column

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- The issue occurs due to a stray carriage return aka '\r' aka ^M, occurring towards the end of line 35 of attachment 38289 - but not at the end itself. This carriage return confuses our line numbering. When

[Bug c++/86942] A trailing-return-type is allowed when the return type is not 'auto' for using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/86962] [9 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- > Issues is that there's a param with DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P which is > addressable. We can probably skip these, but I'm curious Eric how that > changed in your commit? It's a new object, i.e. a PARM_DECL

[Bug c++/86966] ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit specialization of a member class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Reshetnikov --- I believe the code is valid. We explicitly specialize the member class template X of S for S<> (i.e. the parameter pack T is empty). T is expanded into a list of zero non-type template parameters of

[Bug c++/86966] ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit specialization of a member class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/86966] New: ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit specialization of a member class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966 Bug ID: 86966 Summary: ICE (Segmentation fault) for an explicit specialization of a member class template Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67012] decltype(auto) with trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67012 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/70693] valgrind error in get_visual_column

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from David

[Bug target/86965] New: nios2 optimizer forgets about known upper bits of register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86965 Bug ID: 86965 Summary: nios2 optimizer forgets about known upper bits of register Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] [8/9 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 --- Comment #6 from Jason Duerstock --- The fix for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85354 wouldn't happen to have caused this, would it?

[Bug testsuite/86519] [9 Regression] New test case gcc.dg/strcmpopt_6.c fails with its introduction in r262636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86519 --- Comment #17 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- the patch has been committed as: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=263563

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] [8/9 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 --- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Aug 15 15:25:46 2018 New Revision: 263561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263561=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71625 - missing strlen optimization on different array

[Bug libgcc/86512] Incorrect sub result for float subnormal inputs in armv7(with -msoft-float).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug debug/86964] New: Too many debug symbols included, especially for extern globals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86964 Bug ID: 86964 Summary: Too many debug symbols included, especially for extern globals Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/86957] gcc should warn about missing profiles for a compilation unit or a new function with -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86957 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/86963] std::tuple incorrectly assigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86963 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think we want a similar solution as for PR 86751 i.e. r263185

[Bug libstdc++/86963] std::tuple incorrectly assigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86963 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/19315] document undocumented extension that allows code where variable is not emitted in the asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Wed Aug 15 11:45:44 2018 New Revision: 263556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263556=gcc=rev Log: Don't make unsized objects into extern. 2018-08-15 Iain Sandoe gcc/c:

[Bug libstdc++/86963] New: std::tuple incorrectly assigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86963 Bug ID: 86963 Summary: std::tuple incorrectly assigned Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug bootstrap/86872] [9 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86872 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00866.html

[Bug target/84908] retpoline weirdness: 7.3.0-1 and 4.8.5-16: with -fPIC: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `__x86_indirect_thunk_rax'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84908 --- Comment #14 from Jason Vas Dias --- RE: Comment #13: > You said that Andi Kleen had a comment. Can you point me to it? Here is a quote, from LKML message : Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc5 2/2] x86/vdso: \ VDSO should handle

[Bug lto/86412] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_prevailing_virtual_decl, at lto/lto-symtab.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86412 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/86856] Format warnings building all-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86856 --- Comment #10 from jon_y --- I noticed there are some casting from gcall to gimple, not being familiar with gcc internals, is it the correct way to suppress the warnings?

[Bug target/86777] Bfin port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86777 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- I don't think you could do that through the API provided by this patch set; but it's not really appropriate for this case. I'm not familiar with the bfin architecture so cannot comment on what the best

[Bug c++/70693] valgrind error in get_visual_column

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/83196] ICE in gfc_build_compare_string, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3609 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83196 --- Comment #5 from Arjen Markus --- (In reply to Arjen Markus from comment #4) > Created attachment 44543 [details] > Sample module exhibiting the problem > > ICE at line 11329 - any reduction seems to make the problem go away (but > also the

[Bug fortran/83196] ICE in gfc_build_compare_string, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3609 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83196 Arjen Markus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/80931] ICE on move_alloc in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931 Arjen Markus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug sanitizer/86962] [9 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/86962] [9 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/86962] New: [9 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 Bug ID: 86962 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug target/81685] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-ns-2.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error) on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Wed Aug 15 09:19:39 2018 New Revision: 263553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263553=gcc=rev Log: Update Darwin section names for DWARF5 gcc/ 2018-08-15 Iain Sandoe PR

[Bug tree-optimization/86925] [9 Regression] ICE in get_predictor_value, at predict.c:2551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86925 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86925] [9 Regression] ICE in get_predictor_value, at predict.c:2551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86925 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Aug 15 08:55:15 2018 New Revision: 263552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263552=gcc=rev Log: Fix merging of 2 predictors (PR tree-optimization/86925). 2018-08-15 Martin Liska