https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87853
--- Comment #4 from Terry Guo ---
Thanks Derek for reporting. I can reproduce what Derek described and do think
this is a bug.
_mm_cmpgt_epi8 (__m128i __A, __m128i __B)
{
return (__m128i) ((__v16qi)__A > (__v16qi)__B);
}
This one performs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
Summary|Detect Divide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> > If the warning is based of a const, maybe lead with that e.g. in the 2nd
> > place here:
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70831
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87079
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70380
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87853
--- Comment #3 from Terry Guo ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> Xuepeng, can you take a look?
OK. Working on it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Krupcale ---
Created attachment 44945
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44945=edit
analogous patch for GCC 8.2 potentially allowing future GCC to build GCC 8.2
(untested)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
Bug ID: 87858
Summary: Building old multilib bootstrap GCC: stage1 32-bit
libstdc++ fails to build after building 64-bit
libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87857
--- Comment #3 from Stas Sergeev ---
So a clang bug?
I wonder if ubsan is supposed to produce the
compile-time errors, rather than the run-time
warnings. Would it be possible to downgrade
this to a compile-time warning, and/or add a
switch to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87857
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
1<<31 is undefined in C, but not in C++ (since C++14).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87857
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
1 << 31 is undefined for C99 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87857
Bug ID: 87857
Summary: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
--- Comment #22 from postmas...@flash-gordon-me-uk.bounceio.net ---
Your email was bounced...
-
... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Oh
no!
What to do next?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
--- Comment #21 from felix ---
> va_list ap2;
> va_copy(ap2, ap);
> and then use , this always works.
> the proposed macros are both broken and unnecessary.
That's not equivalent. Using va_arg(ap2, T) does not propagate state changes
back to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 20:12:57 2018
New Revision: 265732
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265732=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-11-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/54613
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87782
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 87782, which changed state.
Bug 87782 Summary: [9 Regression] runtime error: load of value 1818451807,
which is not a valid value for type 'expr_t'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87782
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87782
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 19:50:14 2018
New Revision: 265730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265730=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87782
* frontend-passes.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Nov 1 19:36:08 2018
New Revision: 265729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265729=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/40196
* dependency.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87856
Bug ID: 87856
Summary: Use subdir-objects in libgfortran automake
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87782
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87782
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 18:41:28 2018
New Revision: 265727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265727=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/46020
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87855
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87853
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xuepeng.guo at intel dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87853
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87855
Bug ID: 87855
Summary: std::optional only copy-constructible if T is
trivially copy-constructible
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82857
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
The dwz man shows:
...
-M NAME --multifile-name NAME
Specify the name of the common file that should be put into the
.gnu_debugaltlink section alongside
with its build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82857
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82857
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #40 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Terry Guo from comment #39)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #38)
> > (In reply to Terry Guo from comment #36)
> >
> > > OK. Do it right now.
> >
> > I think that latest attachment is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Bug ID: 87854
Summary: [9 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c ICE for
16-bit size_t
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
I think this is caused by misoptimizing
void **x;
void *info ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
{
cselib_val *v = (cselib_val *)*x;
struct elt_loc_list **p = >locs;
int had_locs = v->locs != 0;
while (*p)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87853
Bug ID: 87853
Summary: _mm_cmpgt_epi8 broken with -funsigned-char
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87852
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87852
Bug ID: 87852
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53465.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Engelhardt from comment #8)
> g++-9 from openSUSE devel:gcc, the rest from Tumbleweed, SVN numbers see -v
> banners above.
Ok, the trunk version is before libsanitizer merge. Please try it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
--- Comment #8 from Jan Engelhardt ---
g++-9 from openSUSE devel:gcc, the rest from Tumbleweed, SVN numbers see -v
banners above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851
Bug ID: 87851
Summary: [8/9 Regression] Wrong return type for len_trim
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
---
Can't confirm:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 9.0.0 20181101 (experimental)
$ g++-8 --version
g++-8 (SUSE Linux) 8.2.1 20180831 [gcc-8-branch revision 264010]
$ g++ -ggdb3 pr87840.cpp -fsanitize=leak && ./a.out
=
==1573
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
Jan Engelhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
--- Comment #6 from Jan Engelhardt ---
Found a case where g++-9 also misses a leak when -fsanitize=address is not
present.
14:47 a4:~ > cat y.cpp
#include
struct S {
std::shared_ptr other;
};
int main()
{
auto e =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
Jan Engelhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #39 from Terry Guo ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #38)
> (In reply to Terry Guo from comment #36)
>
> > OK. Do it right now.
>
> I think that latest attachment is the one that should be tested.
> Functionally it is the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
What about this:
$ cat empty.c
int main()
{
__builtin_malloc (12345);
return 0;
}
$ gcc -fsanitize=leak empty.c && ./a.out
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Engelhardt from comment #2)
> How could I go about debugging why such a backtrace won't show for me?
Good question. I use openSUSE Tumbleweed. Maybe try:
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87849
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Zaitsev ---
Same for code without using STL algorithms and containers:
int min(int a, int b)
{
return a < b ? a : b;
}
int max(int a, int b)
{
return a > b ? a : b;
}
int foo(int* v, int size) {
int l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
--- Comment #2 from Jan Engelhardt ---
How could I go about debugging why such a backtrace won't show for me?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87850
Bug ID: 87850
Summary: Add fix-it hint for "invalid conversion from 'X' to
'X*'"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87849
Bug ID: 87849
Summary: Missed optimization: useless for-loop must be
eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87826
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 1 12:31:45 2018
New Revision: 265720
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265720=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87826
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87848
Bug ID: 87848
Summary: [9 Regression] internal compiler error: in
compare_range_with_value, at vr-values.c:1665
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 46020, which changed state.
Bug 46020 Summary: Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1
character return type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 46020, which changed state.
Bug 46020 Summary: Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1
character return type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
Bug ID: 87847
Summary: spec_hasher::hash does not match with
spec_hasher::equal
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 12:00:59 2018
New Revision: 265719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265719=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/46020
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87846
Bug ID: 87846
Summary: std::filesystem::create_directories with a path with a
trailing slash does not create any directory
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 11:56:26 2018
New Revision: 265717
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265717=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/46020
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 11:55:43 2018
New Revision: 265716
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265716=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/46020
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87845
Bug ID: 87845
Summary: cselib_hasher::hash function does not match with
cselib_hasher::equal operator
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Nov 1 11:37:08 2018
New Revision: 265715
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265715=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/54613
* gfortran.texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
For 403.gcc one only needs: -O2 -g -flto=8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
--- Comment #3 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
Yes, I also tried other compilers, and all of them fail. But in [temp.local] it
is explicitly stated that "the name of a member of the class template hides the
name of a template-parameter of any enclosing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> Would be possible to analyze this a bit?
I would leave it to you. Note that the same happens for SPEC2006 403.gcc
benchmark:
$ gdb --args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Would be possible to analyze this a bit? The patch does have effect on
optimizers because we produce a lot fewer MEM_REFs on type mismatches. Of
course this should not trigger wrong code but it also may be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 1 11:14:08 2018
New Revision: 265713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265713=gcc=rev
Log:
PR d/87824
* lang.opt (Wpsabi): New option.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87788
--- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> bootstrap succeeded on x86_64-darwin16 --enable-languages=all for 265659.
>
> Shall we leave this PR open as a place to track getting D working on Darwin?
> .. or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87844
Bug ID: 87844
Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy using non-constant expression as a
non-type template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #38 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Terry Guo from comment #36)
> OK. Do it right now.
I think that latest attachment is the one that should be tested. Functionally
it is the same, but avoids unnecessary variable updates before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44928|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-11-1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
Bug ID: 87843
Summary: [9 Regression] SPEC 2017 miscompilation of 502.gcc_r
with -Ofast -march=native -g -flto=8
-fprofile-generate
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87842
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 87842 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
Bug ID: 87841
Summary: Member of class template hides template parameter of
another member
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87842
Bug ID: 87842
Summary: Member of class template hides template parameter of
another member
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
Bug ID: 87840
Summary: LSAN misses self-refential shared_ptrs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87837
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even the above commented TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED looks weird, I'd expect the
type of the same expression on which we check TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87837
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44939
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44939=edit
gcc9-pr87837.patch
Untested fix for this issue. Note, we should go through all of match.pd and
for each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think there are any, only for local typedefs. That's already enabled by
-Wall so I assumed this was a request to add a new warning *and* enable it in
-Wall.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81277
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70422
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 1 09:19:31 2018
New Revision: 265711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265711=gcc=rev
Log:
Make __PRETTY_FUNCTION__-like functions mergeable string csts (PR c++/64266).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 1 09:19:31 2018
New Revision: 265711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265711=gcc=rev
Log:
Make __PRETTY_FUNCTION__-like functions mergeable string csts (PR c++/64266).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81277
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 1 09:19:31 2018
New Revision: 265711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265711=gcc=rev
Log:
Make __PRETTY_FUNCTION__-like functions mergeable string csts (PR c++/64266).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #36 from Terry Guo ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #35)
>
> Actually, we can use crtl->stack_realign_processed to delay DRAP generation.
> The condition in the patch should be changed to:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #35 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Terry Guo from comment #31)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #30)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #29)
> > > > Let's ask Jakub about asan, if it is possible to move generation
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
