https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
>
> --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #14)
> > > Did you use bootstrap-lto-lean (and not bootstrap-lto)?
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksei.voity...@bell-sw.co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92554
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 07:33:58 2019
New Revision: 278431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278431=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92554
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92555
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 07:31:28 2019
New Revision: 278430
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278430=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-09-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92555
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 92540, which changed state.
Bug 92540 Summary: [10 regression] r278218 breaks bootstrap on riscv64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 19 07:22:21 2019
New Revision: 278429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278429=gcc=rev
Log:
Initialize a variable due to -Wmaybe-uninitialized.
2019-11-19 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #14)
> > Did you use bootstrap-lto-lean (and not bootstrap-lto)?
>
> OK, I finally managed to reproduce and debug this.
> It is triggered by fact that bootstrap-lean is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92574
Bug ID: 92574
Summary: Inefficient code for multidimensional array assess
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92571
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92566
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 47295
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47295=edit
Guard V2DImode and V1TImode under VSX and P8VECTOR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92566
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
commit 8f46b677a34ae74b219824ba2d190b64543737e2
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 19 08:11:40 2018 +
PR c++/87934
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression) : Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
struct A;
template struct B { typedef A _Type[_Nm]; };
template struct array { typename B<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems; };
constexpr char wildcard = '*';
struct A {
char ch_ = wildcard;
};
void fn1() {
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92573
Bug ID: 92573
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92572
Bug ID: 92572
Summary: Vague linkage does not work reliably when a matching
segment is in a dynamically linked libarary on Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83258
S. Davis Herring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herring at lanl dot gov
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92320
S. Davis Herring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herring at lanl dot gov
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92571
Rich Felker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92571
--- Comment #1 from Rich Felker ---
Note that I put it in a function just because VLA is invalid at file scope, and
I wanted to be clear that this bug is independent of the invalidity of VLA at
file scope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92571
Bug ID: 92571
Summary: gcc erroneously rejects , operator in array dimensions
as syntax error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92551
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92551
--- Comment #3 from Darrell Wright ---
I think this can be closed and sorry for wasting time. It was explained how
this is ok to me https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44034#c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92548
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Revision 275550 was okay. Revision 276011 failed. Test was introduced in
275982.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.2.1
--- Comment #2 from John
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92493
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92493
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Nov 18 22:14:16 2019
New Revision: 278423
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278423=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/92493 - ICE in get_origin_and_offset at gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92570
Bug ID: 92570
Summary: clang fails to instantiate std::optional if A is
not const copy constructible
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92569
--- Comment #1 from Bill Lipa ---
$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (MacPorts gcc9 9.2.0_1) 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92569
Bug ID: 92569
Summary: gfortran read with end directive does not trigger in
gfortran 9.2
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92476
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Nov 18 19:28:53 2019
New Revision: 278419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/92508
* ipa-inline.c (inline_small_functions): Add new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86160
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> Generic (for some floating-point formats, and maybe not for 128-bit
> formats on 32-bit targets) bit-pattern is* were implemented by Tamar
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86160
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Generic (for some floating-point formats, and maybe not for 128-bit
formats on 32-bit targets) bit-pattern is* were implemented by Tamar
Christina's patches that had to be reverted as they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This doesn't resemble the logic in riscv_address_insns in any way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The following fixes the ICE:
--- gcc/cp/constexpr.c.jj 2019-11-16 18:13:28.524822284 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c 2019-11-18 19:38:40.032618830 +0100
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92504
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90007
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #4)
> Well, often sel-sched just does not discriminate hardregs and pseudos when
> checking if renaming/substitution may be applied. Sure, as a matter of
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92568
Bug ID: 92568
Summary: OpenMP 5 - implicit mapping of scalar with
TARGET/ALLOCATABLE/POINTER attribute: shall be
'tofrom' mapped
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92549
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> But it looks like x86 has exactly patterns like this - but in this case
> I guess combine won't ever try this because hardregs are invovled
> (not sure if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92567
Bug ID: 92567
Summary: libgo regression in syscall test on ppc64le resulting
in timeout due to hang in read
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I opened PR92566 for that. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92566
Bug ID: 92566
Summary: rs6000_preferred_simd_mode isn't very good
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92563
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92551
--- Comment #2 from Darrell Wright ---
The Args... is in a non deduced context because it isn't at the end.
http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.deduct#type-5.7
With that, I think only trailing packs can be defaulted to empty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92564
Bug ID: 92564
Summary: libgo regression in runtime test resulting in SIGSEGV
on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92565
Bug ID: 92565
Summary: trunk/libgcc/config/libbid/bid_internal.h: 2 * useless
assignments ?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92561
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92549
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Further info on the topic:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45766444/why-is-xchg-reg-reg-a-3-micro-op-instruction-on-modern-intel-architectures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92561
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92563
Bug ID: 92563
Summary: trunk/gcc/cp/error.c:1988: useless parameter ?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92549
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g. Agner Fog has in the tables for Atom mov r,r 1uops, latency 1, rec.
throughput 1/2, while for xchg r,r 3uops, latency 6, rec. throughput 6.
It doesn't look beneficial speed wise then.
Though, even say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
--- Comment #25 from Aleksei Voitylov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> Fixed on trunk. Can arm people verify? I checked the DSE dump only. Bonus
> if you manage to create a testcase for the testsuite failing before, passing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think it doesn't hurt to punt instead of ICEing in the generic code, but as
Richard said, if it is not a target bug, it is at least a very strange choice,
how can a mode like V2DImode be preferred simd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
We always have many modes we cannot put in registers at all. This is normal.
And yeah, what Richard says in c#3. Why do we do that? Is that a target bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92562
Bug ID: 92562
Summary: Allow [[maybe_unused]] in class member declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Did you use bootstrap-lto-lean (and not bootstrap-lto)?
OK, I finally managed to reproduce and debug this.
It is triggered by fact that bootstrap-lean is not training objc and
other frontends which is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91962
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91962
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 18 16:39:24 2019
New Revision: 278416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278416=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91962 - ICE with reference binding and qualification conversion.
When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81159
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> > Ok, this shouldn't be too hard. I guess I could implement it for GCC 10.
>
> last chance to get it in before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92528
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:50:06 2019
New Revision: 278415
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278415=gcc=rev
Log:
Add testcase for already fixed PR ipa/92528
2019-11-18 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 47291 [details]
> gcc10-pr92557.patch
>
> I'd go with this fix.
> The problem is that with just -maltivec, V2DImode is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92554
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Testing patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92552
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92561
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92561
Bug ID: 92561
Summary: [10 Regression] Regressions starting with r278016
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92551
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:07:11 2019
New Revision: 278406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278406=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92516
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92560
Bug ID: 92560
Summary: ICE using decltype(x < y) when that operator uses
operator<=>
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91450
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47290=edit
gcc10-pr91450.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92525
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92555
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
t.c:8:9: note: === vect_update_vf_for_slp ===
t.c:8:9: note: Loop contains only SLP stmts
t.c:8:9: note: Updating vectorization factor to 8.
that's not true. There is the inner loop induction that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91450
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 92558, which changed state.
Bug 92558 Summary: [10 Regression] Miscompare of 554.roms_r with -Ofast
-march=znver2 -flto since r278289
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92558
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I've reduced the test-case which started to fail with the commit:
$ cat riscv.cc
enum machine_mode {};
enum rtx_code { SUBREG, PLUS };
bool fn1(int);
int fn2(machine_mode);
struct A {
int offset;
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #12)
> > It still fails for me with the current trunk:
> >
> > $ ../configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc/ --disable-multilib --without-isl
> > --disable-libsanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
> It still fails for me with the current trunk:
>
> $ ../configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc/ --disable-multilib --without-isl
> --disable-libsanitizer --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean
> $ make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92559
Bug ID: 92559
Summary: Returning std∷map breaks tail-recursion optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92525
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:04:57 2019
New Revision: 278405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278405=gcc=rev
Log:
Unset m_checker in sem_function::init.
2019-11-18 Martin Liska
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91737
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #6 from nsz at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65649
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92558
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:41:11 2019
New Revision: 278400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278400=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-11-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92558
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
Konstantin Kharlamov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor ---
The RFC did not receive any real negative feedback so I proposed to commit an
updated patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01494.html
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
