https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97361
Bug ID: 97361
Summary: power10 unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Bug ID: 97360
Summary: ICE in range_on_exit
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
No failures in diagnostic-test-expressions-1.c in my latest build (just about
an hour old). The latest x86_64 result posted to gcc-testresults also looks
clear of plugin test failures except pr97117:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice in logical_combine, at |[11 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
The reduced C code is
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
int a;
void b(uint32_t c) {
uint32_t *d =
for (; a;)
for (;; (*d %= a) / (*d > 1 > (c > 0)) ?: d)
;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
The code seems to break gcc trunk sometime between 20201006 and 20201007.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359
Bug ID: 97359
Summary: ice in logical_combine, at gimple-range-gori.cc:754
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82721
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97358
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly modified testcase where bar is surely instantiated and clang++ still
accepts it. It actually ICEs in all of -std=c++{11,14,17,20}.
struct A;
struct B { A foo (); };
enum C { E };
struct A {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97358
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97358
Bug ID: 97358
Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE while building firefox
since r8-2720
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95904
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95904
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ville Voutilainen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3427e31331677ca826c5588c87924214f7e5c54b
commit r11-3760-g3427e31331677ca826c5588c87924214f7e5c54b
Author: Ville Voutilainen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2)
[...]
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-test-expressions-1.c
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97318
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Tentative patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
index afac1bda45d..7b6a42893f9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
+++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
@@ -365,6 +365,30 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391
--- Comment #7 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
as we noticed, when using gcc10.2.1 compile our application, 528 C++ modules
failed with this bug.
looks like a high priority bug to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
/10.2.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../latest_gcc/configure --prefix=/home/qinzhao/Install/latest
-enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 10.2.1 20201009 (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97357
Bug ID: 97357
Summary: Unable to coalesce ssa_names which are marked as MUST
COALESCE.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97356
Bug ID: 97356
Summary: [11 regression] several test case failures after
r11-3748
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Bug ID: 97355
Summary: Bootstrap comparison failure!
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94823
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97311
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97311
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ee44d4c518d61c6bbf75fcf280edc6ce5326ce0
commit r11-3759-g3ee44d4c518d61c6bbf75fcf280edc6ce5326ce0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94823
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ee44d4c518d61c6bbf75fcf280edc6ce5326ce0
commit r11-3759-g3ee44d4c518d61c6bbf75fcf280edc6ce5326ce0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And please ping patches like
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552844.html if you don't
get a review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97336
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
For better or worse, in the internal representation there's no way to
differentiate a call that was synthesized during loop unrolling (or any other
similar transformation) from the original call in the source
/gimple-iterator.h:43
0xf7b1b4 _bb_vec_info::~_bb_vec_info()
../../trunk.git/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2777
0xf7dcf0 vect_slp_region(vec,
vec, vec*, unsigned
int)
../../trunk.git/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:3741
The bug first seems to occur sometime between 20201008 and 20201009.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97348
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> Both build again cuda 9.1.
FWIW, tested post-commit against cuda 11.1, no issues found.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94823
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Despite the code being correct, I think it would be better to hoist this branch
out of the loop:
if (__k == 0)
__r2 += __s;
else if (__k <= __s)
__r2 += __kn +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Certainly.
I've just committed it into the branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70a66ff0228277b4dd89263a663c0a87eb5d782f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70a66ff0228277b4dd89263a663c0a87eb5d782f
commit r10-8874-g70a66ff0228277b4dd89263a663c0a87eb5d782f
Author: Vladimir N.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97079
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Related testcase that gives a similar ICE:
int c, d;
int e[1];
void a(int *);
void f(void) {
while (d);
int g[5];
for (; d < 2; d++)
e[d] = c;
for (; d; d++)
g[d] = (long)e;
a(g);
}
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Certainly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97353
Bug ID: 97353
Summary: -Wuninitialized should warn about reading condition in
do-loop
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Vlad, do you plan to backport this to 10.3?
Unfortunately, a few days ago people reported a serious problem with the patch
(see PR97313). I've just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb37ad8cc0fc937c7afcdab471e5d65d176041c3
commit r11-3758-gbb37ad8cc0fc937c7afcdab471e5d65d176041c3
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> (because well, on GIMPLE we can duplicate all blocks).
I'm not sure I understand why, given that tracer.c has a can_duplicate_bb_p
that sometimes returns false.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
--- Comment #27 from Luke Dashjr ---
AFAIK it's complete, but I am not a GCC developer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > > > x86-64-v2 includes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > > x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16B, aka CX16. But -mcx16 doesn't define
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97329
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The default -mcpu= for a compiler targeting powerpc64le-linux is
normally power8 (you can change this with the --with-cpu= configure
option though). -mcpu=powerpc64le is also (currently) equal to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16B, aka CX16. But -mcx16 doesn't define __CX16__.
>
> It's called
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16B, aka CX16. But -mcx16 doesn't define __CX16__.
It's called __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16, I think. Is this good enough?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97336
--- Comment #2 from Christian Franke ---
Sorry, but I disagree that this report is INVALID.
Unlike for example -Wstringop-overflow, warnings like -Wstring-compare should
IMO only occur if the warning condition holds for *all* function calls
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97343
--- Comment #2 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> All below for Part 2.
>
> Without -ffast-math you are seeing GCC using in-order reductions now while
> with -ffast-math the vectorizer gets a bit confused about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97348
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97348
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:383400a6078d75bbfa1216c9af2c37f7e88740c9
commit r11-3752-g383400a6078d75bbfa1216c9af2c37f7e88740c9
Author: Tom de Vries
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-09
Component|ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
This looks like a miscompilation of the compiler with this particular setup so
reclassifying (regular bootstrap works just fine).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 97334, which changed state.
Bug 97334 Summary: inefficient vectorization of gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr65935.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97334
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97334
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16760e5bf7028dfa36b39af305d05cdf2c15b3a9
commit r11-3750-g16760e5bf7028dfa36b39af305d05cdf2c15b3a9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97319
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97352
Bug ID: 97352
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c fails to vectorize all
opportunities with AVX
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97295
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Sergei for the nice test-case.
It started with r8-4715-g35cd23ebb6d05e13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97351
Bug ID: 97351
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c bad vectorization
with AVX
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96835
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Weinzierl ---
Created attachment 49339
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49339=edit
Reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
Bug ID: 97350
Summary: [11 Regression ] Ada bootstrap fails with:
self_referential_size, at stor-layout.c:172
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 97335, which changed state.
Bug 97335 Summary: [11 Regression] 525.x264_r fails with -Ofast -g
-march=znver2 -flto=16 since r11-3641-gc34db4b6f8a5d803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 97292, which changed state.
Bug 97292 Summary: [11 Regression] dealII from SPECCPU 2006 no longer
terminates after g:c34db4b6f8a5d80367c709309f9b00cb32630054
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffe8baa996486fa0313aa804a064a58b0b161f07
commit r11-3748-gffe8baa996486fa0313aa804a064a58b0b161f07
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffe8baa996486fa0313aa804a064a58b0b161f07
commit r11-3748-gffe8baa996486fa0313aa804a064a58b0b161f07
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97334
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So what happens is that we fatally fail the SLP build of the multiplication
operands since they look like
t5.c:20:37: note: vect_is_simple_use: operand _58 * _59, type of def:
internal
t5.c:20:37: note:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 97347, which changed state.
Bug 97347 Summary: [11 Regression] error: statement marked for throw in middle
of block in botan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97347
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97347
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d708c6315e0fc57992cda7b466a5a9877ced4e3
commit r11-3747-g5d708c6315e0fc57992cda7b466a5a9877ced4e3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 49338
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49338=edit
disable param tracking on clones
Perhaps this has chance to help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
So adding only -fno-ipa-cp fixes the problem!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97347
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
Bug ID: 97349
Summary: Incorrect types for some Neon vdupq_n_<...> intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97317
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cde5d85bec20877bed063fc0046b9885231a0ae
commit r11-3746-g1cde5d85bec20877bed063fc0046b9885231a0ae
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97317
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97347
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26163
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
The change is:
ipa-modref: in read_MVD_CABAC/1761, call to exp_golomb_decode_eq_prob/1803 does
not clobber 3->3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> PRE dump files:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pWbEPfAqIThlTdEYWJ_g2yvDowqUSa-Q/
> view?usp=sharing
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
PRE dump files:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pWbEPfAqIThlTdEYWJ_g2yvDowqUSa-Q/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pWbEPfAqIThlTdEYWJ_g2yvDowqUSa-Q/view?usp=sharing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97203
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> This case is about:
>
> [local count: 177167400]:
> + pretmp_327 = MEM[(int *)dep_dp_76(D) + 8B];
> + goto ; [100.00%]
> +
> + [local count: 177167400]:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
This case is about:
[local count: 177167400]:
+ pretmp_327 = MEM[(int *)dep_dp_76(D) + 8B];
+ goto ; [100.00%]
+
+ [local count: 177167400]:
ctx_144 = _44 + 4;
+ pretmp_335 = MEM[(int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97348
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Looking in the nvptx-as sources, we find a hard_coded default:
> ...
> const char *smver = "sm_30";
> ...
> and after changing that to sm_35, the conftest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97348
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Anyway, we should be able to work around this by having gcc explicitly pass -m
sm_35 to nvptx-as:
...
-#define ASM_SPEC "%{misa=*:-m %*}"
+#define ASM_SPEC "%{misa=*:-m %*; :-m sm_35}"
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 94801, which changed state.
Bug 94801 Summary: Failure to optimize narrowed __builtin_clz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94801
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94801
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:781634daea8cb788efb33994f4a19df76598542e
commit r11-3744-g781634daea8cb788efb33994f4a19df76598542e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97312
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:781634daea8cb788efb33994f4a19df76598542e
commit r11-3744-g781634daea8cb788efb33994f4a19df76598542e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97325
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:600cf1128e49f086522bfddc54490b4e39e30383
commit r11-3743-g600cf1128e49f086522bfddc54490b4e39e30383
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97337
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
