[Bug target/98210] New: SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 Bug ID: 98210 Summary: SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/98019] Concepts: compound requirement expression from 'requires' expression is considered discarded-value expression for [[nodiscard]], false positive warning emitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98019 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3a63fb3854392af65a191154e3586e7f5a1066e commit r11-5873-gc3a63fb3854392af65a191154e3586e7f5a1066e Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/59238] Dynamic allocating a list-initialized object of a type with private destructor fails.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59238 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4eb28483004f8291c1f17df3b242716a5151c180 commit r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291c1f17df3b242716a5151c180 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:28:49AM +, dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 > > --- Comment #13 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- > Ok, I have

[Bug c/98209] printf failed with O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98209 --- Comment #2 from jamesgua at ca dot ibm.com --- Created attachment 49709 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49709=edit preprocessed src file gcc -E

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #13 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- Ok, I have objdump, and the .exe file. What switch options do I need to use in objdump? thanks From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020

[Bug c/98209] printf failed with O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98209 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you provide the preprocessed source?

[Bug testsuite/98208] make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98208 Ilya Leoshkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at acm dot org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/98191] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have vector_cst in has_single_use, at ssa-iterators.h:400 since r11-5821-gebdfd1606da6b5aa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98191 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab3a5ff07cd7f7101ac6f7f0635c485aad73f47e commit r11-5870-gab3a5ff07cd7f7101ac6f7f0635c485aad73f47e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/98020] PPC: mfvsrwz+extsw not merged to mtvsrwa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98020 Jens Seifert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/98020] PPC: mfvsrwz+extsw not merged to mtvsrwa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98020 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/98198] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- This simple patch avoids the ICE: diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c index 1d2ab7c..8847932 100644 --- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c @@ -767,6

[Bug target/98167] [x86] Failure to optimize operation on indentically shuffled operands into a shuffle of the result of the operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98167 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > We already handle IX86_BUILTIN_SHUFPD there but not IX86_BUILTIN_SHUFPS for > some reason. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2019-May/521983.html I was

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- The fix looks safe to backport; it isn't a regression, but the number of duplicate reports argue for making an exception.

[Bug c++/98103] [10 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE tree |[10 Regression] ICE tree

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0221c656bbe5b4ab54e784df3b109c60cb27e5b6 commit r11-5869-g0221c656bbe5b4ab54e784df3b109c60cb27e5b6 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/97634] [10/11 Regression] ICE 'verify_gimple' failed on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97634 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 --- Comment #9 from Ben Wiederhake --- I totally forgot to say it: Thanks for fixing it so quickly! :D When I saw https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97634 I was afraid it would suffer a slow death – but nope, fixed within a few days.

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to dpozar from comment #11) > Thomas, > > that looks good. But I am not sure how to proceed ... > > dave Well, the first thing to do is to use either nm or objdump on the executable

[Bug c/98209] New: printf failed with O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98209 Bug ID: 98209 Summary: printf failed with O1 or above Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug sanitizer/98206] UBSan: Casting from multiple inheritance base to derived class triggers undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98206 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/57111] Generalize -Wfree-nonheap-object to delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --- The following enables the warning for the test case reported in comment #0 (and all libstdc++ code): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561378.html

[Bug middle-end/88173] constant folding of NaN comparison depends on order of operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88173 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/98166] bogus -Wmismatched-dealloc on user-defined allocator and inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98166 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/98160] [11 Regression] ICE in default_tree_printer at gcc/tree-diagnostic.c:270 since r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98160 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #11 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- Thomas, that looks good. But I am not sure how to proceed ... dave From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 2:27 PM To: David Pozar

[Bug testsuite/98208] New: make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98208 Bug ID: 98208 Summary: make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/98198] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- The current master is still affected.

[Bug c/98198] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Can you check with gcc trunk? There were recent fixes in the handling of noinit/persistent attribute: g:762ca20364a590be2cb9c79c0101ccbff74b5de1

[Bug c++/98207] ARM64 IEEE math results change with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98207 --- Comment #4 from Paul Ramsey --- Thanks for the pointer!

[Bug c++/96299] Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a member has operator < and operator == and return type is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/96299] Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a member has operator < and operator == and return type is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ed1dc1275bba89af92bfc7d97c21b376e4c29c3 commit r11-5866-g4ed1dc1275bba89af92bfc7d97c21b376e4c29c3 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/98207] ARM64 IEEE math results change with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98207 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > The default is to use fused multiple add. > If you don't want to use FMA, then use -ffp-contract=off (the default =fast). > > > x84_64 by default does not have

[Bug fortran/98203] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:4665 since r11-349-gf884bef21cccc05d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98203 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/98182] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_verify_flow_info)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98182 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98207] ARM64 IEEE math results change with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98182] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_verify_flow_info)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98182 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7251a2c103bc48775cb9726a4bebeaebde96684 commit r11-5863-gf7251a2c103bc48775cb9726a4bebeaebde96684 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue

[Bug c/98198] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/98204] ICE in pointer_diff, at c/c-typeck.c:3954 since r8-5108-g05abad4cca62d372

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98204 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Summary|ICE in

[Bug c++/98207] ARM64 IEEE math results change with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98207 --- Comment #1 from Paul Ramsey --- Created attachment 49708 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49708=edit Test program temp files built with O2

[Bug c++/98207] New: ARM64 IEEE math results change with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98207 Bug ID: 98207 Summary: ARM64 IEEE math results change with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/98189] [SH] ICE and segmentation fault with -O2 and without -fno-guess-branch-probability when building gdal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98189 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- May I please remind this issue?

[Bug middle-end/88173] constant folding of NaN comparison depends on order of operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88173 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|`std::numeric_limits::qu |constant folding of NaN

[Bug c++/98206] UBSan: Casting from multiple inheritance base to derived class triggers undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98206 --- Comment #1 from Roland B --- Here is the actual error message: // - example.cpp:16:49: runtime error: reference binding to misaligned address 0x7ffdc34cab61 for type 'const struct X', which requires 8 byte alignment 0x7ffdc34cab61:

[Bug c++/98206] New: UBSan: Casting from multiple inheritance base to derived class triggers undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98206 Bug ID: 98206 Summary: UBSan: Casting from multiple inheritance base to derived class triggers undefined behavior sanitizer Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- I don't have a working mingw system myself, but I dusted off my cygwin system for this, using their cross-compiler to mingw. With $ x86_64-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe -static -static-libgfortran csqrt.f90

[Bug middle-end/98190] [11 Regression] GCC11 miscompiles code using _Bool when inlining: bfxil instruction misused since r11-165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps some of those checks on the other side are redundant and could be turned e.g. into gcc_checking_assert of gcc_assert, I bet if the MEM_REF doesn't overwrite all bits, but only some subset of them,

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #9 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- Thomas, when I run your code with gcc from command line, I still do not see any output (no errors, but no output). Tried with both c and c++. I am not an expert at C, and actually I don't think

[Bug middle-end/98190] [11 Regression] GCC11 miscompiles code using _Bool when inlining: bfxil instruction misused since r11-165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, do we need to special case MEM_REF stores that store all bits (i.e. bitpos 0 bitsize equal to mode bitsize) into non-MEM variables which are promoted? Something like: --- gcc/expr.c.jj 2020-12-02

[Bug c++/97965] constexpr evaluation vs. NaNs inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97965 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/560463.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/560515.html are some mails on the topic.

[Bug c++/88173] `std::numeric_limits::quiet_NaN()` is not always constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88173 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97965] constexpr evaluation vs. NaNs inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97965 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- See also PR88683 and PR88173. I notice that the match.pd REAL_CST patterns starting around line 4045 only look at the RHS of the comparison, so that nan > inf is handled very differently from inf < nan.

[Bug fortran/98203] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:4665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98203 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-08 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to dpozar from comment #6) > Thomas, > I am running that code in code blocks with MS visual C++ 2010, but I can't > find the output - no console screen, and no output file that I can find. What if

[Bug target/66791] [ARM] Replace builtins with gcc vector extensions code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0ed52d3e0044630b57a2145be78de199539d995 commit r11-5858-gc0ed52d3e0044630b57a2145be78de199539d995 Author: Prathamesh

[Bug c/98205] New: ICE in expand_omp_for_generic, at omp-expand.c:4307

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98205 Bug ID: 98205 Summary: ICE in expand_omp_for_generic, at omp-expand.c:4307 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/98204] New: ICE in pointer_diff, at c/c-typeck.c:3954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98204 Bug ID: 98204 Summary: ICE in pointer_diff, at c/c-typeck.c:3954 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/98203] New: [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:4665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98203 Bug ID: 98203 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:4665 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/97920] [FINAL] -O2 segment fault due to extend derive type's member being partially allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97920 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/92469] ICE: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame' in 7/8/9/10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak --- *** Bug 98194 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/98194] [9/10/11 Regression]internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98194 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #6 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- Thomas, I am running that code in code blocks with MS visual C++ 2010, but I can't find the output - no console screen, and no output file that I can find. dave

[Bug rtl-optimization/97092] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in ira-color.c since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Corallo --- "akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 > > --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Hi all, > > I can't reproduce this on current

Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/97092] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in ira-color.c since r10-4752-g2d56600c

"akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 > > --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Hi all, > > I can't reproduce this on current master (76a1719f0ff), I guess has been > fixed in the meanwhile? As not said I swapped two

[Bug rtl-optimization/97092] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in ira-color.c since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi all, I can't reproduce this on current master (76a1719f0ff), I guess has been fixed in the meanwhile? Andrea

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- What is the output of #include #include int main() { _Complex float z, sq, sq2; int n; float a; a = -1.; for (n = 1; n < 10; n++) { a = a * 10; z = a + _Complex_I * 1.0;

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #4 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- Thomas, the output for gfortran -v is: c:\MinGW>gfortran -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=c:/mingw/bin/../libexec/gcc/mingw32/9.2.0/lto-wrapper.exe Target:

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 --- Comment #3 from dpozar at ecs dot umass.edu --- Thomas, compile time works fine; runtime not so good. dave Output below: Runtime Argument SquareRoot SR squared (-.1000E+02

[Bug target/98189] [SH] ICE and segmentation fault with -O2 and without -fno-guess-branch-probability when building gdal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98189 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Unfortunately, I can't reproduce that with a cross compiler. Hmm, that's a pity. Just tried with the latest snapshot we have in Debian, same result:

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/98201] CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mingw CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/98199] [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm pretty sure it started with r11-5704-g896048cf43d5eb21ab7c16553bb9d13b0f890b81

[Bug c++/98202] New: C++ cannot parse F128 suffix for float128 literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98202 Bug ID: 98202 Summary: C++ cannot parse F128 suffix for float128 literals Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98199] [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 --- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan --- Ah, yeah, apologies: looks like I messed up the bisect here, scratch that.

[Bug middle-end/98190] [11 Regression] GCC11 miscompiles code using _Bool when inlining: bfxil instruction misused since r11-165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98199] [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > struct b { > long a; > short d; > int c; > int f; > int e; > int g; > }; > struct h { > int a; > int i; > short j; > struct b k; > signed : 20; > int e; > int g; > }

[Bug rtl-optimization/94440] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r7-5324-gb8cab8a5492e9639

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e401db7bfd8cf86d3833805a81b1252884eb1c9d commit r11-5855-ge401db7bfd8cf86d3833805a81b1252884eb1c9d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/98201] New: CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98201 Bug ID: 98201 Summary: CSQRT function gives bad resuts at runtime Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/98200] New: [GIMPLE FE] ICE with parsing ternary expr with -fgimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98200 Bug ID: 98200 Summary: [GIMPLE FE] ICE with parsing ternary expr with -fgimple Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/98199] [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/97141] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141 --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi all, this is so far my understanding of what is going on here: While in expand the vector builder is trying to build to determine elt number 3 of a vector of POLY_INT_CST. To do that the step

[Bug tree-optimization/98199] [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug c/98199] [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-08

[Bug target/97653] Incorrect long double calculation with -mabi=ibmlongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97653 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was committed, but with the wrong PR number so didn't get added here: The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f1a6501994a2d18ec4fe2a6664637f48021b210 commit

[Bug c/98199] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199 Bug ID: 98199 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (stack smashing detected) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/98190] [11 Regression] GCC11 miscompiles code using _Bool when inlining: bfxil instruction misused since r11-165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC 11.0 miscompiles code |[11 Regression] GCC11

[Bug c++/93093] __builtin_source_location reports values for default arguments not aligned with the Standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93093 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/98087] [11 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98087 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- We often (but not always) treat it as regression because compilation of random garbage code (that happens to include the newly added builtin) didn't ICE before and now ICEs. A different case is when one

[Bug c/98087] [11 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98087 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think this should really be considered a regression, the built-in didn't exist in older versions. It's a bug in a new feature, not a regression.

[Bug target/98196] [11 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code at -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98196 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --- @Martin: I originally saw the issue with a testcase generated by YARPGen (https://github.com/intel/yarpgen), but this only hit the bug with LTO. I reduced that with cvise and then manually tweaked the

[Bug c/98197] [11 Regresson] internal compiler error: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98197 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't see how this can be considered a regression, the built-in didn't exist in older versions. It's a bug in a new feature, not a regression.

[Bug middle-end/98190] GCC 11.0 miscompiles code using _Bool when inlining: bfxil instruction misused?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c/98198] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug target/98194] [9/10/11 Regression]internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Keywords|

[Bug c/98195] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98195 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c/98198] New: [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198 Bug ID: 98198 Summary: [11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in decl_or_type_attrs Product: gcc

[Bug target/98196] [11 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code at -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98196 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

  1   2   >