https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100501
--- Comment #3 from Chengnian Sun ---
A duplicate.
foo() { __asm__("" : : "m"(({}))); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #54 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
After an update to Fink's dejagnu, I got similar results.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100580
Bug ID: 100580
Summary: ICE with -fdump-passes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100579
Bug ID: 100579
Summary: [coroutines] Poor codegen using an optional-like type
with co_await
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Some context: the purpose of this deleted operator() is so that when invoking
an adaptor object as an rvalue, we don't ever select the const&-qualified
operator() overload, because doing so would break the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100578
Bug ID: 100578
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE
pass: fre (under -g -O2/O3/Os)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.0, 10.2.0, 10.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
--- Comment #13 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #12)
> A change to go-gcc.cc should not change any of the error messages emitted by
> the Go frontend. It should not change the way that issue4458.go is handled.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
Bug ID: 100577
Summary: [11/12 Regression] Unhelpful diagnostics for
ill-formed call to partially applied range adaptor
object
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100567
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100549
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
when args0 and args1 is the same, gimple_build (, GT_EXPR, cmp_type,
args0, args1) will just return 0 w/o set stmts, which cause ICE in
gsi_insert_before (gsi, *NULL*, GSI_SAME_STMT);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100549
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Started with r12-110-gc54a9f7259fce1a2.
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94680
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94de7e225c1fda079052c3f0725c926437d56c94
commit r12-760-g94de7e225c1fda079052c3f0725c926437d56c94
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100550
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100349
Theodore Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tlwang at uwaterloo dot ca
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Just to clarify: when I said the warning is justified I meant that there is
nothing in the IL to keep the warning from triggering. I.e., it works as
designed. The problem may be solved by optimizing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576
Bug ID: 100576
Summary: ICE at -O1 and above: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100536
--- Comment #3 from Chengnian Sun ---
A duplicate here.
typedef struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct {
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100575
Bug ID: 100575
Summary: ICE: in expand_stack_alignment, at cfgexpand.c:6385
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 50803
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50803=edit
Reduced testcase - works with hostfall back but fails with GCN and nvptx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db514f98a383b2ebdcfe74feb80f98f406cec174
commit r12-756-gdb514f98a383b2ebdcfe74feb80f98f406cec174
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 100571, which changed state.
Bug 100571 Summary: bogus -Wstringop-overflow with VLA of elements larger than
byte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d1e4025b2bd2ce36d6ee2a5d836d31ec8a12999
commit r10-9819-g0d1e4025b2bd2ce36d6ee2a5d836d31ec8a12999
Author: Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
A change to go-gcc.cc should not change any of the error messages emitted by
the Go frontend. It should not change the way that issue4458.go is handled.
Those errors messages are emitted long before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Below fixes this PR and does not break the other testcase:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
index cce18d094a6..ebc9ea42beb 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100521
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100521
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d902a1b57606536982a1001670f998de685eaf7c
commit r12-755-gd902a1b57606536982a1001670f998de685eaf7c
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100446
Simon Marchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
Bug ID: 100574
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE: in size_remaining, at
builtins.c:413 with -O3 -ftracer
-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573
Bug ID: 100573
Summary: [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN
offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c +
for-9.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100572
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100572
Bug ID: 100572
Summary: arm: Assemble failures with MVE vcreateq intrinsic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
Bug first appears sometime between git hash 21dfb22920ce32fc,
dated yesterday and git hash 097fde5e7514e909, dated today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> A wild guess: you are compiling for TARGET_XOP?
Not sure. bdver2.
Reduced C code:
typedef float DBL;
struct {
DBL c_x, c_y
} Random_Simis_Cur;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> Yeah, this is a non-existent SSE "cmove". I tried to find all paths where
> this should divert to a sequence of logic instructions or PBLENDB, but due
> to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100558
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88443
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
Bug ID: 100571
Summary: bogus -Wstringop-overflow with VLA of elements larger
than byte
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #11)
> I might be seeing something similar:
>
> caxcpy.f: In function 'caxcpy':
> caxcpy.f:53:72: error: unrecognizable insn:
>53 | end subroutine
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #60 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
Notable sub-message:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570039.html
And the final essence, from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570044.html
"
GCC issue,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100480
--- Comment #6 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
All good. Just be aware that the usual OSS "volunteer excuse" is a bit cheap in
a project where names like Apple, Google, IBM, Redhat, ARM etc. appear.
My understanding is that complaints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mliska at suse dot cz |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100567
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, there were a LOT of new warnings and such:
previous run: g:227a2ecf663d69972b851f51f1934d18927b62cd, r12-741: 52 failures
this run: g:7d7d925d0d799eb9dda4a6bd6162af0a7db9c98b, r12-742:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97102
Bug 97102 depends on bug 96005, which changed state.
Bug 96005 Summary: Add possibility to use newer ptx isa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96005
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96005
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96005
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a1586401a21dcd43e0f904bb6eec26c8b2f366b
commit r12-751-g2a1586401a21dcd43e0f904bb6eec26c8b2f366b
Author: Tom de Vries
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100570
Bug ID: 100570
Summary: g++ does not suppress bitfield conversion warning even
isystem is setted
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce3c70e9ed265578be896b8f7711851b0a7273f1
commit r11-8405-gce3c70e9ed265578be896b8f7711851b0a7273f1
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
Bug ID: 100569
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has
lto warnings after r12-742
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw ---
Does configure succeed in all multilib subdirectories?
tail x86_64-linux-gnu/*/libphobos/config.log
x86_64-linux-gnu/libphobos/config.log
And if one doesn't, inspect it to see why.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
--- Comment #11 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Had a quick regression test on the patch:
issue4458.go which pass before, but fail on this patch.
Compiling message changed from "error: method expression requires named type or
pointer to named type" to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100558
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99988
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99988
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52a09050fdfafb0e41d56b6adf1625264f315b82
commit r9-9528-g52a09050fdfafb0e41d56b6adf1625264f315b82
Author: Alex Coplan
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:097fde5e7514e909f2e8472be2e008d0cab2260d
commit r12-750-g097fde5e7514e909f2e8472be2e008d0cab2260d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100558
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47342
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-09-26 00:00:00 |2021-5-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99644
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100477
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
You're right that the #pragma can be a little flakey with inlining. This is a
recurring issue that can be made worse by LTO. A fix I submitted for GCC 11
got deferred to GCC 12 (see pr98465 comment 12).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100558
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100568
Bug ID: 100568
Summary: [12 regression] ICE at gcc/tree-ssa.c:1214 after
r12-657
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50801
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50801=edit
patch
OK, so the issue is that predication is still bogus (similar to the other PR)
and we're treating a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100491
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100471
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 11.2/12+ so far.
Should be backported to 9 and 10 which do support task reductions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100392
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100508
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 11.2/12+ so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100508
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5998192bff6313a49d1e78bb224f8d7600a6072d
commit r11-8403-g5998192bff6313a49d1e78bb224f8d7600a6072d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100392
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6ecd493886891f8150905a2fd3b7d54e88fc7be
commit r11-8404-gb6ecd493886891f8150905a2fd3b7d54e88fc7be
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100471
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58ce04708738840fa1917c49f686ce0266ba6e77
commit r11-8402-g58ce04708738840fa1917c49f686ce0266ba6e77
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100567
Bug ID: 100567
Summary: views::take and views::drop should conditionally use
_RangeAdaptor::operator()
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100392
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6b664e2c4c127025e076d8b584abe0976694629
commit r12-748-gc6b664e2c4c127025e076d8b584abe0976694629
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98375
Bug 98375 depends on bug 98461, which changed state.
Bug 98461 Summary: Suboptimal codegen for negating a movemask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100336
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
Is this fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The r9-2635 change miscompiles it during PRE,
[local count: 347387062]:
j_7 ={v} s;
if (j_7 == 0)
goto ; [34.00%]
else
goto ; [66.00%]
[local count: 291805133]:
# i_8 = PHI <0(2),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|9.4
Summary|[11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, on more reduced testcase from that it started already in
r9-2635-g78ea9abc2018243af7f7ada6135144ac90c6ad27
(likewise at -O2):
volatile int s, c;
__attribute__((noipa)) void
foo (void)
{
if (c++ >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
--- Comment #9 from Petr Sumbera ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8)
> Unlikely I'd say. Could you go into the $(buildir]/gcc/ada directory and do:
> ls -l rts/i-cexten.ads
> ls -l rts_32/i-cexten.ads
> They should not point to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
Bug ID: 100566
Summary: [11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since
r11-2446
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100565
Bug ID: 100565
Summary: [nvptx] Need configure options for misa default
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100552
--- Comment #1 from Marius Hillenbrand ---
Indeed, that line should not use the bash-specific pattern substitution and
instead like this:
diff --git a/gcc/configure.ac b/gcc/configure.ac
index e9ba2af548a..4e788019d99 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96932
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
> Crossref: PR100497 - fails on Volta without
> membar.sys;
> before
> atom.global.exch.b32
>
> Unfortunately, compared to pre-Volta, it is very slow -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99908
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Never mind, the original reference to arm was not the 'arm cpu', my mistake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99908
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> Should be fixed in trunk.
The original report was about arm. None of your changes are outside of the x86
backend, so no, this is not fixed for the original
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
