https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114997
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
typedef int vv __attribute__((__vector_size__(sizeof(int;
constexpr vv ff(int code) { return vv{code}; }
template struct h {
typedef _Tp type;
};
template void f() {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7ff8ae5313bea755f5960786b33a7b151e7b663
commit r15-336-gd7ff8ae5313bea755f5960786b33a7b151e7b663
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114965
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44d84db11ab724c34a8b1f8c0e06da1cc78439a2
commit r13-8735-g44d84db11ab724c34a8b1f8c0e06da1cc78439a2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cad27df08915ead8db3c7d512cfcc1866e7ece69
commit r13-8734-gcad27df08915ead8db3c7d512cfcc1866e7ece69
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114956
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1ec7bc9cb0639a212422710ba647dc1aaea6eaa
commit r13-8733-gd1ec7bc9cb0639a212422710ba647dc1aaea6eaa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114876
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e07df053031e109c50387c92d689950de1d193ab
commit r13-8732-ge07df053031e109c50387c92d689950de1d193ab
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111284
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f1b3f9c97e17aa717ae61bc70afa27adcb7ef44
commit r13-8731-g6f1b3f9c97e17aa717ae61bc70afa27adcb7ef44
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114825
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d30cfc3fc88976151d0d10e73e10111ccb71ee0
commit r13-8730-g6d30cfc3fc88976151d0d10e73e10111ccb71ee0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115001
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|pr109062.c fails on hybrid |[14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115001
Bug ID: 115001
Summary: pr109062.c fails on hybrid Intel CPU
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115000
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect all of the see also bugs here are the same issue, I described my try
of fixing that in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113#c8 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #10 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #9)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #8)
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-def.cc
> > b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-def.cc
> > index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #8)
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-def.cc
> b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-def.cc
> index e8c129ce643..f27284cb20a 100644
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115000
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced:
```
template
concept bool c = false;
template
struct ts{};
struct S {};
S s;
ts t33{s};
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115000
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115000
Bug ID: 115000
Summary: Confusing 'cannot convert to 'int' in initialization'
error message
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #25 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #23)
> 3) Only build the IEEE 128-bit libgcc bits if the user configured the
> compiler with --with-cpu=power7, --with-cpu=power8, --with-cpu=power9,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #8 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Chen Chen from comment #0)
> We tested Loongarch64 CPU Loongson 3A6000 with "LA664" architecture in Linux
> operating system AOSC OS 11.4.0 (default gcc version is 13.2.0). And we
> found the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The following patterns could be improved/removed while doing this:
```
/* (A - B) == 0 ? (A - B) : (B - A)same as (B - A) */
/* (A - B) != 0 ? (A - B) : (B - A)same as (A - B) */
/* (A - B) >=/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||113265
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Another one:
> ```
> int f(int a, int b, int x)
> {
> x = a - b;
> int y = -x;
> return (x >= 0 ? x : 0) + (x <= 0 ? y : 0);
> }
> ```
>
> This should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|`a - b == b - a` -> `a == |A few missing optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114999
Bug ID: 114999
Summary: `a - b == b - a` -> `a == b`
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112659
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> This is the pattern I added for the plus case:
> ```
> (for cnd (cond vec_cond)
> ...
> /* (a != CST1) ? (a + CST2) : 0 -> (a + CST2) iff CST1 == -CST2 */
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114988
--- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong ---
Li Pan is going to work on it.
Hi, kito and Jeff.
Can this fix backport to GCC-14 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried that and with it trunk did finish building. I am running a test of
that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE during IPA pass:|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114997
--- Comment #2 from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez ---
On WebKit we finally work-arounded the problem by replacing `constexpr` with
`const` at commit
https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/commit/1ee00a2309c03ed119e8591022ba14f936440d71
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|fmtlib named argument |[14/15 Regression] fmtlib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114998
Bug ID: 114998
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-inline
-fno-tree-dce -fno-ipa-cp" on x86_64-linux-gnu:
Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114997
--- Comment #1 from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez ---
The original cpp file that causes the issue can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114997
Bug ID: 114997
Summary: ICE with -std=c++20: unexpected expression
‘static_cast('\"')’ of kind
static_cast_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
--- Comment #6 from Pratik Chowdhury ---
> [[assume((uintptr_t(x_array) & (32-1)) == 0)]];
The Parans in the & have definitely given someone sleepless nights LOL. I
myself was saved by the warnings.
> Right now we don't always prop back what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14)
> > --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > BTW, I'm waiting for a review, or at least a nod from a C++ savvy person
> > here:
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 58136
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58136=edit
proposed patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I wonder if something like this would work.
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
index 5781f50..ea8a685 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
+++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
@@ -1730,6 +1730,8 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh this is the more correct syntax:
[[assume((uintptr_t(x_array) & (32-1)) == 0)]];
[[assume((uintptr_t(mul_array) & (32-1)) == 0)]];
[[assume((uintptr_t(add_array) & (32-1)) == 0)]];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114996
Bug ID: 114996
Summary: [15 Regression] [RISC-V] 2->2 combination no longer
occurring
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
--- Comment #3 from Pratik Chowdhury ---
Yeah definitely.
My bad.
Sorry.
@Andrew Pinski [however even that change does not seem to change the results
for GCC with Aligned Loads not being used](https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/9WbMbePc1)
Added the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect the syntax you want instead is:
[[assume(uintptr_t(x_array) & (32-1) == 0]];
Becuase __builtin_assume_aligned takes a pointer and returns a pointer that has
the assumed alignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58135
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58135=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Trying my hand at reducing this slightly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
Bug ID: 114995
Summary: C++23 Assume keyword not being used for vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note lambdas is not need can happen in any template function:
```
#include
#define FMT_HEADER_ONLY
#include
using namespace fmt::literals;
template
auto test(int a)
{
return fmt::format("{foo}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Dmitrii Pasechnik from comment #26)
> We have megabytes of code calling libraries where setjmp/longjmp is used,
> in github.com/sagemath/sage/ (most of it in Cython).
>
> It looks like a huge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
Bug ID: 114994
Summary: fmtlib named argument compiler error introduced in
g++-14.1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code fragment in comment#2 was added in r7-3760-g92c5266bbd5378.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114993
Marc Poulhiès changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jemarch at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #26 from Dmitrii Pasechnik ---
We have megabytes of code calling libraries where setjmp/longjmp is used,
in github.com/sagemath/sage/ (most of it in Cython).
It looks like a huge hassle to put volatiles there.
Looks like we would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114993
--- Comment #1 from Marc Poulhiès ---
After discussing on IRC, C++ (or anything != C) is not supported by BPF.
The fix is probably to display an error when using anything else than the C FE.
The Rust FE gives another error:
/bpf/gcc-trunk-20240508/bpf-unknown-none
--exec_prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/bpf/gcc-trunk-20240508/bpf-unknown-none
--with-local-prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/bpf/gcc-trunk-20240508/bpf-unknown-none/bpf-unknown-none
--with-headers=/opt/compiler-explorer/bpf/gcc-trunk-20240508/bpf-unknown-none/bpf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
--- Comment #2 from Larry Smith ---
Thanks for the (very) fast turn-around (!). I'll look into the situation over
the coming days and reply further (so if you can keep the issue alive for now,
thanks). Just briefly though, can you (or anyone)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 112792, which changed state.
Bug 112792 Summary: -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds false positives seen on Linux
kernel with certain unions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15614
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111009
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 58134
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58134=edit
adjusted patch
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Andrew - this doesn't pick to gcc-13 because of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114872
--- Comment #25 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #23)
> [...]
> > Why did `gcc` generate unconditional NULL dereference here? I suspect it
> > somehow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114992
Bug ID: 114992
Summary: ICE during IPA pass: targetclone in
add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.cc:492
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44951|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114991
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114991
Bug ID: 114991
Summary: [14/15 Regression] AArch64: LDP pass does not handle
some structure copies
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109804
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] internal |[11 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15614
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Boulenguez ---
Hello.
First reported as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=244970.
This seems fixed in gnat-14, snapshot from the 20240429 in Debian.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> BTW, I'm waiting for a review, or at least a nod from a C++ savvy person here:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109804
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16319f8fba6c049d743046488588f40da2349048
commit r12-10432-g16319f8fba6c049d743046488588f40da2349048
Author: Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114942
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've started to work on this PR. I hope a patch will be ready on this or the
next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez ---
BTW, I'm waiting for a review, or at least a nod from a C++ savvy person here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650634.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114981
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de4eea7d7ea86e54843507c68d6672eca9d8c7bb
commit r15-331-gde4eea7d7ea86e54843507c68d6672eca9d8c7bb
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114989
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> So expand is usually fast. The only slow part I know of that might be
> hitting here is division by constant where we are trying to find if it is
> better to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114989
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58131=edit
codeml.i
codeml.i from the same project is not great either but it's way less
interesting, I think, because it's large.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
Bug ID: 114990
Summary: Compiler errors in compiling a
module-based app
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114986
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114989
Bug ID: 114989
Summary: Compile time hog when building paml
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114810
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f00e6caca1a14dfe26e94f608e9d79a787ebe08
commit r15-330-g2f00e6caca1a14dfe26e94f608e9d79a787ebe08
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 58129
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58129=edit
pre-processed failing file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.3.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111331
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39d56b96996dd8336652ceac97983c26fd8de4c6
commit r12-10431-g39d56b96996dd8336652ceac97983c26fd8de4c6
Author: Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111331
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16e27b6d03756bf1fae22607fa93107787a7b9cb
commit r11-11421-g16e27b6d03756bf1fae22607fa93107787a7b9cb
Author: Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113582
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9318caed3bbff8136d13e00dcfc020a59d10f78
commit r15-329-gd9318caed3bbff8136d13e00dcfc020a59d10f78
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c00c3245e688d00dae3e928f0d03f530640caae
commit r11-11420-g6c00c3245e688d00dae3e928f0d03f530640caae
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88fe8210e4edc2f4ddf722ba788924452c6f6a0
commit r12-10430-gd88fe8210e4edc2f4ddf722ba788924452c6f6a0
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114750
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3097e01cd5d32e9825b7b87dff12b3247bd9819
commit r12-10426-gb3097e01cd5d32e9825b7b87dff12b3247bd9819
Author: Matthias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114803
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ab30fb865e6465156f7db10506b56ef2df19648
commit r12-10429-g0ab30fb865e6465156f7db10506b56ef2df19648
Author: Matthias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109822
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44df51e5826747d089a08fa1a1378454a8d2d0de
commit r12-10423-g44df51e5826747d089a08fa1a1378454a8d2d0de
Author: Matthias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110054
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e60ec9b0e02e8647c289d204342e992e91750011
commit r12-10422-ge60ec9b0e02e8647c289d204342e992e91750011
Author: Matthias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109762
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
The patch does not apply directly to GCC 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
