[Bug driver/71850] @file should be used to cc1/cc1plus when @file is used

2017-07-11 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71850 Andrew Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrewjcg at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/58140] -Wnon-virtual-dtor shouldn't fire for classes declared final

2014-01-06 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140 Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrewjcg

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-04-12 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com 2013-04-13 01:44:27 UTC --- I did several attempts at bisecting this. Whenever I (hackily) reverted the change which caused the regression, it just popped up a few hundred

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-03-08 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com 2013-03-09 04:17:39 UTC --- I was able to bisect this to http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=172430. I haven't had time to dig in further, but that rev looks

[Bug c++/56493] New: Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-03-01 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 Bug #: 56493 Summary: Performance regression in google dense hashmap Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-03-01 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 13:11:30 UTC --- Created attachment 29561 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29561 Sample program using dense hashmap

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-03-01 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 13:12:41 UTC --- I also see this same perf regression on trunk (as of r195725).

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-03-01 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 22:09:10 UTC --- Created attachment 29565 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29565 Preprocessed test program source

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

2013-03-01 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 22:10:14 UTC --- Ah, sorry. Just attached preprocessed sources now (which had to be compressed to it in the 1K size limit).

[Bug c++/54207] New: ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

2012-08-09 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 Bug #: 54207 Summary: ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

2012-07-24 Thread andrewjcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975 Andrew Gallagher andrewjcg at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrewjcg