https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-23
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> Potential fix:
Regtests ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112609
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112643
--- Comment #26 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Urs Janßen from comment #25)
> (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #24)
> > Patch aims to fix that:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112643
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #4)
> Could you provide the exact options you build GCC with --disable-bootstrap
> for me to reproduce?
>
> I suppose all of them a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112643
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For clarification: I did not bisect, but yesterdays build did work,
today's doesn't, and I am seeing warnings while building libgfortran
most likely pointing to this change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112643
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56655
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56655=edit
config.status
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 56654
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56654=edit
Log of retry of build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112609
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-18
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
F2023 has changed the requirements for the arguments to SYSTEM_CLOCK:
"Fortran 2018 allowed integer arguments to the intrinsic subro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56546|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> We need to detect and diagnose violations of the above.
Example:
program main
implicit none
type t
integer :: i
end type t
typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56563=edit
Partial testsuite fixes
This patch contains obvious fixes to 3 testcases, except for
assumed_rank_9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112460
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56519|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112459
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56519
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56519=edit
Partial patch
This patch adjusts the checking so that nested NULL()s are accepted,
tries to implem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Potential fix:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.cc b/gcc/fortran/match.cc
index f848e52be4c..9e3571d3dbe 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/match.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/match.cc
@@ -5064,6 +5064,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ASSOCIATE intrinsic does|ASSOCIATED intrinsic does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97045
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104555
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Steve Lionel of Intel confirmed that the code is valid, and that if X is
polymorphic, so is (X):
community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/SELECT-TYPE-statement-and-parenthesized-selector/m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> Created attachment 56192 [details]
> Fix for this PR
I was thinking of something along these lines, but was wondering:
a) there could be mu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #10)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> I'm not sure what you are worried about here. If one has
>
>do i = 1, n
> ... = expre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The coarray cases in comment#2 will be rejected with:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
index 1cc65d7fa49..08081dacde4 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
+++ b/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
Known to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The suggested optimization needs to take into account that the evaluation
of the temporary expression might trap, or that allocatable variables are
not allocated, etc.
The trap etc. would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111851
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Lightly tested, probably obvious patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
index 136a292807d..536884b13f0 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66969
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83282
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-12-05 00:00:00 |2023-10-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66969
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.kluepfel at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111783
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> This leaves ABORT and EXIT to deal with.
Speaking to myself:
subroutine s1()
call exit(1)
stop 98
end
subroutine s2()
call abort
stop 99
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111783
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #9)
Addendum:
> I was suspecting gfc_conv_variable as a possibly further place for a fix:
> it has a loop over ref's that looks incomplete for REF_COMPONE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8)
> Created attachment 56073 [details]
> "Fix" for this PR
>
> Hi Harald,
>
> You are touching the right place. Howev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110957
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56071
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56071=edit
Patch to fix mixed up parsing of fpe options
The attached patch fixes the mixup and adds the possibil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoine.lemoine@bordeaux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111618
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following snippet in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment looks suspicious:
if (expr1->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER
&& expr1->symtree->n.sym->ts.deferred
&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84693
Bug 84693 depends on bug 59298, which changed state.
Bug 59298 Summary: ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type
(containing an array) using array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95710
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95710
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following code shows an issue that popped up while looking at pr55978:
program test
implicit none
integer, pointer, contiguous :: p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96809
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95215
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.1, 12.3.1
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93485
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802
Bug 37802 depends on bug 30802, which changed state.
Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with
-fbounds-check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766
Bug 27766 depends on bug 30802, which changed state.
Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with
-fbounds-check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anthony.debeus at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-September/059756.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111341
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111339
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mikael,
are you still onto it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #23 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111321
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexandre.poux at coria dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111304
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mailling-lists-bd at posteo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55821|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A workaround is to add a 'private' statement to any of the first two modules.
301 - 400 of 2560 matches
Mail list logo
