https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following patch fixes this:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
index 20ea38e0007..35ae637a483 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108369
--- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> Works using the correct compiler option. We probably should get rid of or
> change the -x option or document it.
Is there a way to warn th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106945
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109171
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-17
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #8)
> For what it's worth, ISO/IEC DIS 1539-1:2022 (E) now contains the following:
>
> All standard procedures in the intrinsic module ISO_C_BINDI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109157
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> ifort rejects this code, gfortran and cft compile but trigger the runtime
> abort, pgf90 compiles and runs without abort.
Actually that co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #9)
> Besides intrinsic types -> class(*), we should also check check
> type(t) -> ('class(t)' and 'class(*)')
I've opened pr109148 for r
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following is a spin-off from pr58331. Consider:
module mymod
implicit none
type t
integer :: i
end type t
contains
subroutine mysub(a, n)
integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93635
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93635
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109099
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109099
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106945
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106945
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 54627
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54627=edit
Latest patch
This patch fixes the testcases in this PR.
I tried other testcases that use coarr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109080
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6)
> Created attachment 54598 [details]
> Tentative patch
> This seems to work on the reduced testcases, can't fully test right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The previous patch would accept invalid code, as it would miss assumed-shape.
Fixed by the additional:
@@ -2650,10 +2669,14 @@ compare_parameter (gfc_symbol *formal, gfc_expr
*actual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also:
MODULE m
contains
subroutine bar (arg, res)
class(*) :: arg
character(100) :: res
end subroutine
END MODULE
USE m
END
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following code gives surprising warnings:
integer :: x, y, z
volatile :: x
volatile :: x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 52227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 51610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
Bug 51605 depends on bug 51610, which changed state.
Bug 51610 Summary: [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and
TARGET
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 101101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101101
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 104229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104229
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 107380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107380
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53951
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 53951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108937
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
Bug 96024 depends on bug 96025, which changed state.
Bug 96025 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in expr_check_typed_help, at
fortran/expr.c:5437
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #6)
> Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-March/059003.html
As discussed in this thread, this version of the patch works for
subroutine s1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-March/059003.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 54567
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54567=edit
Updated patch
The original patches started to bit-rot, so here is an updated version.
The curr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108452
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-02-28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106946
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The frontend leaks memory for the following sample:
module m
interface
subroutine s ()
end
end interface
end
==7949== 3,176 (2,792 direct, 384 indirect) bytes in 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108937
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108937
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libfortran |fortran
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108937
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108924
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108924
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-February/058949.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108872
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to John Wingate from comment #2)
> I forgot to mention in the original description that the error does not
> occur if the SELECT CASE is removed.
Right. The testcase case be sl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104554
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104554
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104346
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104321
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> I think it is not only dead code but it should be also removed:
>
> Glancing at the code, the 'data = NULL;' does not make sense (cf.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 95107, which changed state.
Bug 95107 Summary: ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|10.5
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108757
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I am not sure this can be done in the normal case unless you know the range
> of a to be [64...INF] .
> The wrap around case might be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103259
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103779
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103779
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70817
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A slightly reduced & rewritten variant of the code in comment#6:
module m
implicit none
private
public :: cx, operator(+)
private :: cx_plus_int! <- why does th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108693
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103259
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103259
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108651
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-31
701 - 800 of 2555 matches
Mail list logo
