https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89983
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 89528, which changed state.
Bug 89528 Summary: Wrong debug info generated at -Og [gcc-trunk]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90017
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I think it's more of a missing feature than a bug. I believe GDB folks already
know about this, though maybe not about this specific manifestation thereof.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:44:46 2019
New Revision: 270388
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270388=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86438] avoid too-long shift in test
The test fell back to long long and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:44:57 2019
New Revision: 270389
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270389=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR89528] reset debug uses of return value when dropping dead RTL call
When we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 89454, which changed state.
Bug 89454 Summary: gcc generates wrong debug information at -Og
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89454
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89892
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
*** Bug 89454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89454
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88730
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In both GCC 9.0.1 20190404 (experimental) and GCC 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat
8.3.1-2) I get for j outside the innermost loop. Does anyone
still observe the problem in GCC8 or elsewhere?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90017
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This odd behavior is an artifact of the way GCC lays out the basic blocks, and
how GDB interprets the line number program.
The blocks containing the conditional calls to optimize_me_not in line 15 are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 46089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46089=edit
candidate patch
Here's what I'm testing
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
DCE drops the dead call to j() after inserting debug temps that reference the
return value of the call, but it fails to adjust/reset the debug temp. Looking
into how to fix it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89530
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
We'd need to add VTA notes to addressable objects, that currently only get
older var-tracking treatment. It's usually enough, because, being addressable,
they can't really change locations, and, because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89529
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Yeah, consumer issue, GDB can't deal with location views yet, so it can't tell
apart the views just before the return from that at the return proper. It's
actually a textbook situation of the kind that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|aoliva at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88534
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88534
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Mar 15 13:56:55 2019
New Revision: 269709
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269709=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR88534] accept VAR_DECL in class literal template parms
P0732R2 / C++ 2a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88537
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Mar 15 13:56:55 2019
New Revision: 269709
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269709=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR88534] accept VAR_DECL in class literal template parms
P0732R2 / C++ 2a
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45957
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45957=edit
candidate patch
Could the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 13 19:08:52 2019
New Revision: 268851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268851=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86379] do not use TREE_TYPE for USING_DECL_SCOPE
It's too risky to reuse the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87322
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87322
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:42:39 2019
New Revision: 268850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268850=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR87322] move cp_evaluated up to tsubst all lambda parms
A lambda capture
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45631
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45631=edit
hack that allows the testcase to compile
This patchlet enables compilation of the testcase, but it's most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
AFAICT the problem is that we do not substitute the type pack into the arg pack
when specializing the enclosing template. That specialization removes one
template level from the nested template, so we
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86218
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86218
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Feb 7 07:50:42 2019
New Revision: 268606
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268606=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86218] handle ck_aggr in compare_ics in both and either conversion
Because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87322
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The attached patch had several regressions, use the one I posted instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00371.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87322
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45614
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45614=edit
Candidate patch
Besides the cp_unevaluated_operand issue that Jakub mentioned, that causes parm
lists to be
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Feb 5 06:11:25 2019
New Revision: 268529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268529=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR87770] test partial specializations for type dependence
When instantiating a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86218
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg01731.html
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
mine
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
AFAICT Christina is working on it, so I'm changing the bug status so that this
becomes apparent in bug lists
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 17 07:32:29 2019
New Revision: 268006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268006=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR87768] reset location wrapper suppression when reentering top level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 17 07:32:16 2019
New Revision: 268005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268005=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86648] use auto identifier for class placeholder templates
dwarf2out
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45448
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45448=edit
Candidate patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 17 04:49:55 2019
New Revision: 268004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268004=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR88146] avoid diagnostics diffs if cdtor_returns_this
Diagnostics for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80362
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Alas, the fix for bug 77933 broke __builtin_return_address(0
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@li-snyder.org
--- Comment #12
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Confirmed fixed with the patch for bug 87814.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87814 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86875
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86212
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Fixed in r267155
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49167
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I've been working on an off on this specific issue, and on various surrounding
infrastructure issues, for a very long time. Right now I'm not specifically
working on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01740.html
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45293=edit
candidate patch
dwarf2out.c o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|aoliva at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88196
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88196
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
Bug 88146 depends on bug 87814, which changed state.
Bug 87814 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15962 with
range-v3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88180
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #24 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Fixed in the trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 19 06:51:41 2018
New Revision: 267252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267252=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86153] simplify more overflow tests in VRP
PR 86153 was originally filed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239
--- Comment #23 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 19 06:51:41 2018
New Revision: 267252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267252=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86153] simplify more overflow tests in VRP
PR 86153 was originally filed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87012
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 19 06:51:30 2018
New Revision: 267251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267251=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR87012] canonicalize ref type for tmpl arg
When binding an object to a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 19 06:51:19 2018
New Revision: 267250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267250=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR c++/88146] do not crash synthesizing inherited ctor(...)
This patch
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01287.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 14 21:57:07 2018
New Revision: 267155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267155=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87814] undefer deferred noexcept on tsubst if request
tsubst_expr and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:06:15 2018
New Revision: 267144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267144=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86823] retain deferred access checks from outside firewall
We used to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||87814
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg00423.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Dec 6 23:18:40 2018
New Revision: 266875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266875=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86747] tsubst friend tpl ctxt before looking it up for dupes
When a member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86397
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Dec 6 23:18:30 2018
New Revision: 266874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266874=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR86397] resolve nondependent noexcept specs early in C++1[14]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
So, no, it's not a copy ctor, but apparently we're reusing the logic that
synthesizes them for other non-default ctors.
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45162=edit
candidate patch
This patch fixes the additional problem. We have a (...) ctor in a base class,
reexpor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45159=edit
candidate patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 5 06:47:11 2018
New Revision: 266816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266816=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR85569] skip constexpr target_expr constructor dummy type conversion
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
... and it looks like lookup/using44.C really wants the USING_DECL from
lookup_member; the function overloads are not template dependent, and as a
result we perform overload resolution only among them,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
err... using{39,44}.C in g++.dg/lookup, actually. and using44.C is still
broken, sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45124
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45124=edit
fix on top of the improved candidate patch
This patchlet fixes the regressions in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45118|0 |1
is obsolete|
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45118
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45118=edit
candidate patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2018-11-28
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The reason private works where protected doesn't is that private access
checking uses is_friend, whereas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I realized the preprocessed testcase was the work-around rather than the base
failure mode. What confused me was that even the work-around was failing, and
that's what my patch is for.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86397
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01970.html
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45062
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45062=edit
candidate patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #55 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Fixed in the trunk. Does anyone care enough to backport it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #54 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Nov 20 00:07:47 2018
New Revision: 266290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266290=gcc=rev
Log:
PR81878: fix --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada
gnattools build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01558.html
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 45028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45028=edit
candidate patch
Simply leaving the firewall early through lexical scoping didn't cut it, so I'm
try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
201 - 300 of 1091 matches
Mail list logo
