[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2024-01-19 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #19 from Gianfranco --- looks like branch 14 is not FTBFS.

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2024-01-19 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #18 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 57159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57159=edit unreduced testcase // works: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -O3 -fstack-protector-strong -fopenmp -ffast-math

[Bug c++/112680] New: g++-13 segfault on std::regex_match with c++11 or above -O2 and lto

2023-11-23 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 56672 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56672=edit reproduce test case This u

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2023-11-22 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #14 from Gianfranco --- Hello, any news for this issue?

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2023-10-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #10 from Gianfranco --- $ gcc -O3 -fstack-protector-strong -fopenmp -ffast-math -fexpensive-optimizations testcase.i -c This is the minimal cmdline to trigger the issue I could find. cat testcase.i typedef struct { int width

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2023-10-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #9 from Gianfranco --- /usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/13/cc1 -quiet -imultiarch aarch64-linux-gnu -D _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D NDEBUG -isystem -dumpbase -mbranch-protection=standard -mtune=generic -mlittle-endian -mabi=lp64 -g -g

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2023-10-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #8 from Gianfranco --- reduced testcase: typedef struct { int width } dt_bilateral_t; typedef dt_aligned_pixel_t[4]; #pragma omp declare simd void dt_bilateral_splat(dt_bilateral_t *b) { int oy = b; float *buf; long

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2023-10-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #7 from Gianfranco --- I'm reducing it, 8.2%

[Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2023-10-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #6 from Gianfranco --- @Andrew, can you please get it from the build log? https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable=arm64=4.4.2-1%2Bb1=1696847922=0 there are the === BEGIN GCC DUMP === and === END GCC DUMP === that

[Bug target/111677] arm64 build fails unrecognizable insn [REGRESSION]

2023-10-09 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|MOVED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/111677] arm64 build fails unrecognizable insn [REGRESSION]

2023-10-06 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- Thanks, Debian syncs the branch fixes from time to time, last time was up to * Update to git 20230913 from the gcc-13 branch. Indeed, I requested to sync again sources. thanks!

[Bug c/111677] New: arm64 build fails unrecognizable insn [REGRESSION]

2023-10-03 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it via Gcc-bugs
Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 56038 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56038=edit build log and dump Hello, according to https://buildd.debian.

[Bug c++/91500] New: [9 REGRESSION] gcc-9 ICE on valid code

2019-08-20 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 46734 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46734=edit preprocessed sources and log file I'm attaching the log returned by the comm

[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-10-12 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-10-12 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #11 from Gianfranco --- I would avoid an OOM issue, because even trying to compile a single file makes it fail... I'm trying again the same build with updated gcc and I'll report back.

[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-08-02 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #6 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 44485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44485=edit another failing output I'm attaching another file suffering from the same issue (mostly every cpp file has this failure)

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-08-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #5 from Gianfranco --- working one: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/9/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-08-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) > can you please provide the output of the gcc -v command so we can see what > GCC configuration you're using Sorry! I was going to attach it, but forgot :) gcc -v Using

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-08-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 44480 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44480=edit preprocessed source with buggy gcc-8

[Bug c++/86815] [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-08-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 44479 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44479=edit working preprocessed-source with gcc-9 snapshot

[Bug c++/86815] New: [ 8 regression ] ICE on valid code on armhf

2018-08-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- I got the ICE while compiling armhf code, I'm attaching the preprocessed source to this bug report. This happens with the new gcc 8.2, and it works with previous gcc-7

[Bug other/82327] [7 Regression] ICE in equal_mem_array_ref_p, at tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:429 (i686-linux-gnu)

2017-10-12 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327 --- Comment #7 from Gianfranco --- Now with gcc using rev 253388 everything is working again.

[Bug other/82327] [7 Regression] ICE in equal_mem_array_ref_p, at tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:429 (i686-linux-gnu)

2017-09-28 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- Tested with r253234 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-7/7.2.0-7ubuntu4 same issue

[Bug other/82327] [7 Regression] ICE in equal_mem_array_ref_p, at tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:429 (i686-linux-gnu)

2017-09-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- I did add some info on the duplicate bug, I reduced the regression in a bunch of commits (and a two days range).

[Bug c++/82330] New: [7 regression since some days] GCC ICE on i386 building llvm-toolchain-3.8 /<>/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp:518:8: internal compiler error: in equ

2017-09-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
cc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Hello, as said, since patches added in 20-09 and 21-09 I am getting an ICE on i386 with valid code from llvm-toolchain-3.8 (copy-pasted from my Ubuntu report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-

[Bug c++/77822] [6 REGRESSION] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

2016-10-03 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 39733 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39733=edit preprocessed source

[Bug c++/77822] [6 REGRESSION] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

2016-10-03 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 39732 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39732=edit s file

[Bug c++/77822] New: [6 REGRESSION] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

2016-10-03 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- As said, mame on arm64 is not building anymore in Debian unstable, since the gcc-6 switch. According to Matthias

[Bug middle-end/67989] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++ ICE on armel valid code

2015-10-27 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989 --- Comment #16 from Gianfranco --- thanks a lot for the help! with this we will finally finish ocaml and llvm Debian transitions :)

[Bug c++/67989] New: [REGRESSION] g++ ICE on armel valid code

2015-10-16 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Hi, some regression has happened between * Update to SVN 20150903 (r227431, 5.2.1) from the gcc-5-branch. and * Update to SVN 20151003 (r228449, 5.2.1) from the gcc-5

[Bug c++/67989] [REGRESSION] g++ ICE on armel valid code

2015-10-16 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 36526 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36526=edit crash log

[Bug libstdc++/66438] libstdc++ 5.1 broke binary compat with old code using std::error_category

2015-06-06 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- The problem actually is Debian has gcc-4.9 as default compiler, and the libstdc++ provided in testing is from gcc-5.

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-06-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #15 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- Thanks to all for the suggestions! Apparently this is what I presumed from the begin (I read a lot about ABI changes in gcc-5) I'll try to figure out with doko what

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-06-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #6 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- Created attachment 35662 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35662action=edit Reduced testcase I tried in the last few days to reduce as much as possible

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-06-01 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #8 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- Thanks to you Markus, I spent almost one entire week in removing code in order to have something useful for you, and this is the maximum I could achieve. I don't know how

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-05-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #5 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- I'm still trying to provide what requested, as you can see there I'm working right now on it https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=casablancasuite=experimental

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-05-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/66262] New: [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-05-23 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Hi, sorry in advance for the low quality bug report. I'm reporting this upstream, since I suspect the ABI

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

2015-05-23 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- I mentioned a testcase in the Debian bug report. Unfortunately I'm not the upstream developer, I might find difficult to extract what you exactly need...

[Bug rtl-optimization/65693] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1419

2015-04-09 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693 Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/65693] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1419

2015-04-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693 --- Comment #8 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- Nope, I can build on debian (I'm the maintainer BTW) with 4.9 successfully. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=virtualboxarch=amd64ver=4.3.26-dfsg-1stamp

[Bug rtl-optimization/65693] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1419

2015-04-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693 --- Comment #10 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- Hi @Markus, I'm *really* impressed about your efficiency. I reported the progresses on the vbox official mail list, thanks!

[Bug c++/65693] [5.0 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1419

2015-04-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693 Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug c++/65693] [5.0 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1419

2015-04-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it --- Created attachment 35252 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35252action=edit log with -Wall -Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv

[Bug c++/65693] New: [5.0 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1419

2015-04-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Created attachment 35251 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35251action=edit snip of the build log I can't build anymore virtualbox