[Bug c++/115171] New: Constant evaluation of math.h functions in C++ against constexpr.functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115171 Bug ID: 115171 Summary: Constant evaluation of math.h functions in C++ against constexpr.functions Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/49395] Non-class prvalues seem to have cv-qualification with GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49395 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/107962] GCC allows constexpr copy construction despite uninitialized member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107962 --- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2264 suggests that the GCC behaviour may be the desired one because copies of partially-initialized structures are allowed in C but cause undefined

[Bug c++/108324] New: Temporary not bound to reference in default member initializer destroyed early from parenthesized expression-list initialization of aggregate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108324 Bug ID: 108324 Summary: Temporary not bound to reference in default member initializer destroyed early from parenthesized expression-list initialization of aggregate

[Bug c++/107962] New: GCC allows constexpr copy construction despite uninitialized member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107962 Bug ID: 107962 Summary: GCC allows constexpr copy construction despite uninitialized member Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/102000] Defaulted consteval default constructor that performs no initialization is not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102000 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hstong at ca dot ibm.com --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/105934] New: [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] C++11 pointer versions of atomic_fetch_add missing because of P0558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105934 Bug ID: 105934 Summary: [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] C++11 pointer versions of atomic_fetch_add missing because of P0558 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/105588] _Alignof (C) and alignof (C++) on dereference of `double *` disagree on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105588 --- Comment #4 from Hubert Tong --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > _Alignof(expression) works like __alignof__(expression) which works like > __alignof__(__typeof(expression)), while _Alignof(type_name) is mandated by > the

[Bug c/105588] _Alignof (C) and alignof (C++) on dereference of `double *` disagree on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105588 --- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > _Alignof(expression) is still an extension it can return what ever GCC > decides Sure, although why GCC should have corresponding C and C++ extensions that

[Bug c/105588] New: _Alignof (C) and alignof (C++) on dereference of `double *` disagree on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105588 Bug ID: 105588 Summary: _Alignof (C) and alignof (C++) on dereference of `double *` disagree on 32-bit x86 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/105290] New: "Purely syntactic" disambiguation but GCC applies semantic rules for constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105290 Bug ID: 105290 Summary: "Purely syntactic" disambiguation but GCC applies semantic rules for constant expressions Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/104994] New: extern thread_local declaration rejected in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994 Bug ID: 104994 Summary: extern thread_local declaration rejected in constexpr Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug target/100641] Link error when using extern thread_local variables on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100641 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hstong at ca dot ibm.com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/103060] New: Argument initialization side-effects missing: delegating from base constructor to inherited constructor from virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103060 Bug ID: 103060 Summary: Argument initialization side-effects missing: delegating from base constructor to inherited constructor from virtual base Product: gcc

[Bug c++/92060] Alias template as template template argument confused by GCC as other template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92060 --- Comment #3 from Hubert Tong --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2) > Hmm, I think treating A and Q as equivalent here is allowed by CWG 1286. Looks like it; CWG 1286 as not been adopted by the committee though.

[Bug c++/97219] New: Generic lambda does not find function declaration from enclosing block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97219 Bug ID: 97219 Summary: Generic lambda does not find function declaration from enclosing block scope Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: