[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

2021-02-08 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Oops, that what I get for doing 16 things at once. sorry.

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

2021-02-07 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > (In reply to Bill Long from comment #5) > > Is this fixed in a release version of GCC? > > Submitting patch for approval and will backport as the fix is simple.

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

2021-02-07 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net ---

[Bug libfortran/98825] Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

2021-01-31 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- The folowing patch fixes this and regression tests OK. diff --git a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c b/libgfortran/io/transfer.c index 8ab0583dd55..27bee9d4e01 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c +++

[Bug libfortran/98825] Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

2021-01-30 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- I agree with your comment #7

[Bug libfortran/98825] Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

2021-01-29 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- I found the DEC F77 reference. I wanted to capture this somewhere for future reference: o MESSAGE: Extension to FORTRAN-77: nonstandard FORMAT statement item EXPLANATION: The following

[Bug libfortran/98825] Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

2021-01-26 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net ---

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-01-22 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net ---

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

2021-01-01 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Patch regresses several test cases.

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

2021-01-01 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net ---