http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Summary: Bootstrap fail due to invalid register pair being
assigned to pseudo
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-30
06:52:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23812
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23812
Detailed IRA dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
14:27:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 23608 [details]
gcc46-pr48043.patch
Fix (tested just with cross on the pr47201.c testcase). Could you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
Summary: pr47201: var-tracking loc_order_check fails for type
punning examples
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
12:04:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 23594
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23594
pr47201.i.212r.alignments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #18 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-08
14:40:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Created attachment 23581 [details]
patch2
Please validate the more generalized patch.
Bootstraps and works on s390x for both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07
11:47:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
Your patch works! It fixes uninit-pred-7_a.c on s390 and s390x.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07
15:59:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case as
well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07
16:01:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23572
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23572
uninit-pred-8_a.c.126t.cddce2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07
16:01:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23573
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23573
uninit-pred-8_a.c.128t.uninit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20|hppa1.1-hp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:38:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23535
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23535
uninit-pred-7_a.c.126t.cddce2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-03
17:39:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23536
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23536
uninit-pred-7_a.c.128t.uninit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39246
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-01
18:08:11 UTC ---
The first difference between x86_64 and s390x appears in 004t.gimple since
s390x returns complex numbers in memory:
x86_64:
foo ()
{
float D.2684;
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39246
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47646
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09
08:35:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The following patch is missing for
gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/attributes/method-noreturn-1.mm:
Can't you simply move the dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47646
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08
16:46:25 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:46:20 2011
New Revision: 169927
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169927
Log:
2011-02-08 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35258
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02
09:51:17 UTC ---
Marked as 4.6 regression. The behavior of 4.5.2 isn't helpful either but it
doesn't return a wrong value as with 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Summary: Wrong debug info: Invalid variable location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-30
14:37:39 UTC ---
Compiling with
GCC 4.5.2 (gcc version 4.5.2 20101108 (prerelease) [gcc-4_5-branch revision
166433] (GCC))
GDB returns value optimized out for 'a2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-12
14:26:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Fixed for trunk sofar. Let's see if there is any fallout.
This seems to have broken bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09
15:52:30 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Nov 9 15:52:24 2010
New Revision: 166495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166495
Log:
2010-11-09 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09
15:53:22 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Nov 9 15:53:18 2010
New Revision: 166496
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166496
Log:
2010-11-09 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Summary: Missing type promotion for library call argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-06
06:29:02 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Sat Nov 6 06:28:59 2010
New Revision: 166395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166395
Log:
2010-11-06 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-06
06:31:04 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Sat Nov 6 06:31:02 2010
New Revision: 166396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166396
Log:
2010-11-06 Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
08:47:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please try revision 166259.
Ok. I've started bootstrap. I'm quite sure that reverting the will fix the
problem. Perhaps I missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
16:05:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please try revision 166259.
As expected reverting the patch fixes bootstrap on s390x.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
Summary: SPECint2006 403.gcc fails with -mzarch -m31
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
Summary: s390x bootstrap problem: wrong code generated due to
crossjumping
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Summary: negative location ranges generated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
10:53:41 UTC ---
The problem could not be reproduced with head. On head the var_location note in
question is never been generated. I was not able to figure out which change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
601 - 651 of 651 matches
Mail list logo
