Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 53936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53936=edit
Preprocessed source
This is m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104017
--- Comment #6 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
This is from a report I made in private to Martin, for GCC12.
That tidbit seems to have been lost in the bug creation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104017
Lars Gullik Bjønnes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj at gullik dot net
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47644
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47644=edit
Source showing the ICE
g++ (GCC) 10.0.0 20200111 (experimental) (from new git r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93143
--- Comment #1 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
Forgot to mention that it works nicely with GCC 9.
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47586
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47586=edit
Source showing problem.
This is with g++ (
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45675=edit
Soruce that works with gcc8 fails with g
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45635
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45635=edit
Reduced sources showing ICE
With the attached reduced from code using Boost.Asi
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44771
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44771=edit
Source showing error
Using g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44764
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44764=edit
Source file showing the problem
When I compile the attached code I get this ICE:
g++ -v
Us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
--- Comment #10 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #8)
> Sorry about the breakage.
>
> Here's a candidate patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01133.html
This fixes the ICE for me, with the
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
In Eigen (http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page),
this construct is used to group things:
void do_stuff();
void do_other_stuff();
int main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69970
--- Comment #3 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
The warning might be right, but is very unhelpful.
Also with gcc 5 I get no warning (and seeming working code).
Note that this is reduced (and thus a bit strange) from a much
larger code base.
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling this snippet:
class Foo {
public:
explicit Foo(bool)
{}
};
class Bar {
public:
Bar()
: foo_
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68122
--- Comment #1 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
Command used to call:
gcc -fsanitize=undefined -fgnu-tm tm-thread.c
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
With:
gcc (GCC) 5.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65000
--- Comment #2 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
Created attachment 34711
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34711action=edit
preprocessed source for test code in #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65000
--- Comment #4 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
Created attachment 34712
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34712action=edit
preprocesed source for second code snippet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65000
--- Comment #3 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
This is a different code snippet to get what seems to be the same error:
---
#include ostream
int f(unsigned int datalen);
class Streambuf : public std
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
With this test program I get an ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64984
--- Comment #4 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
Created attachment 34710 [details]
gcc5-pr64984.patch
Untested fix.
This seems to fix ICE, but I have at least one more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65000
--- Comment #7 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
Note that my last tests is done with the proposed fix for
bug 64984 applied.
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
With this test program I get an ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218
Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
--- Comment #2 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
I still see this, but with current gcc5 the call stack has become a bit
deeper, instead of 5 calls to walk_tree_1 I now see 9 calls.
(with -std=gnu++14 in this case.)
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Compiling this:
#include string
enum profile_type {};
struct A {
std::string value;
};
struct {
profile_type type;
A strategies[1];
} a{};
with:
g++ -std=gnu
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
cat aligned_alloc.c
#include stdlib.h
int main(void
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
$ cat main.ii
struct Test {
Test();
};
Test::Test()
{
int w = 512;
unsigned rgb_ref[1][w];
}
Gives this error:
$ /opt/gcc/gcc-trunk/bin/g++ -c
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Created attachment 33004
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33004action=edit
Preprosessed file
When compiling a test file consisting of only a
#include boost/asio.hpp
line. I get the following ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61004
--- Comment #7 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
Created attachment 32713 [details]
untested patch
This fixes the problem for me, in my
application.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Created attachment 32707
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32707action=edit
gzipped preprossed code showing the problem
In current trunk I get some new strict-aliasing warnings that I did
: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
When looking at n3793 it states that operator!= should be implemented
with !(t1 == t2), and not t1 != t2 as the implementation in gcc 4.9 is
doing. This is the case for both the operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60710
Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
Created attachment 31897
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31897action=edit
Reduced preprocessed code.
g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20140120 (experimental) as of rev 206794
When compiling the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59886
Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59886
--- Comment #3 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
Yes, the compiler is built with:
../gcc/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc-trunk --enable-checking=release
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
This is with gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20140103 (experimental
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20131128 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2013 Free
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 31304
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-29 19:09
---
This does not seem to be fixed so reopening.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj at gullik dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19699
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-05 18:14
---
(In reply to comment #17)
Lars, can you maybe describe how to reproduce this starting from the lyx
tarball? (I.e. which tarball to download, how to configure so that it uses
PCH
etc.)
As of today
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: larsbj at gullik dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 16:22
---
Just a comment before I begin work to create a testcase that is abit smaller
than
the whole lyx distribution. If I turn off concept checks the ICE goes away.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 18:25
---
Ok, do you want a tar file with the setup to reproduce or do you want me to
attach ~100 attachments to this case with all the files needed to reproduce?
And reading gcc.gnu.org does not make it easier to create
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 19:21
---
I get a bit further with that, but I am not able to reproduce the error with
the resulting .ii file together with the pch.h (and pch.h.gch) file.
Instead I get stuck with myriads or errors similar
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 19:56
---
Then I am at a loss. I am only able to reproduce with the full lyx tree, when
using the preprocessed files I get errors about 'std' not being defined. (etc)
How did you compile the preprocessed sources to end up
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 20:19
---
(In reply to comment #11)
grep -v ^# FormExternal.ii FormExternal.cc
gcc FormExternal.cc -include pch.ii
ok, my mistake was using g++ instead. Using the above I to get a clean compile
(-c). So it is quite
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 20:22
---
(In reply to comment #12)
ok, my mistake was using g++ instead.
Not having done the grep more likely, and trying to compile the .ii file
directly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19241
--- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik dot net 2005-01-03 20:28
---
(In reply to comment #12)
grep -v ^# FormExternal.ii FormExternal.cc
gcc FormExternal.cc -include pch.ii
So it is quite obvious that just using preprocessed sources will not
show the ICE.
If I compile
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19241
52 matches
Mail list logo
