[Bug c++/21089] [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not inline the static const double

--- Comment #29 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 17:41 --- Jason -- I can't argue with that as a literal reading of the standard, but is there any reason why the standard doesn't allow const float variables in (not necessarily integral) constant expressions just as we

[Bug middle-end/45307] Stores expanding to no RTL not removed by tree optimizers, Empty ctors/dtors not eliminated

--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 14:41 --- I have no object to the FE removing trivial code if it can do so -- but I also think that the middle-end should be able to deduce that a function is pure later in the process and eliminate it then. I don't

[Bug middle-end/45307] Stores expanding to no RTL not removed by tree optimizers, Empty ctors/dtors not eliminated

--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 17:50 --- The problem with -Wuninitialized might be the same problem I've been sermonizing about for years -- we're trying to issue sensible warnings from our optimizers, which means that as the optimizers are perturbed

[Bug c++/43680] [DR 1022] G++ is too aggressive in optimizing away bounds checking with enums

--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 20:43 --- I think this optimization is valuable in some cases, so I think this is a question of defaults, rather than of behavior per se. While it may be useful for some security-related applications not to eliminate

[Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info

--- Comment #47 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 16:47 --- Closed at request of submitter. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 17:08 --- Subject: Bug 42748 Author: mmitchel Date: Sun Feb 28 17:07:54 2010 New Revision: 157124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157124 Log: 2010-02-27 Mark Mitchell m...@codesourcery.com

[Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 16:28 --- Ralf -- I think the key question here is whether it is possible to build/install a new version of GCC, getting the same directory layout as was the default in previous versions. It's OK if it takes command-line

[Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 23:23 --- I don't think this should be P1, as getting the old behavior is apparently doable by hand, but I'm a big fan of backwards-compatibility and if the GCS haven't been updated then I think that GCC (as a GNU package

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-18 15:13 --- Paolo -- I think libsupc++ is just as much a system library as libstdc++. It doesn't have an ISO-standard API, of course, but that's not the point; it's just as much a part of the system/implementation

[Bug target/41156] [4.4/4.5 Regression] zlib segfault in inflate_table() compiled w/ -O -msse2 ftree-vectorize

--- Comment #31 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 16:49 --- I still have no idea what this PR is about. Someone needs to make a clear statement of what they believe the ABI to be. There are some simple questions: * Can we expect that the stack is 16-byte aligned

[Bug middle-end/42220] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_5.f90 -m64 -O -frename-registers

--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 16:52 --- I don't think we really know enough yet to understand whether this is a bug, or if it is a bug, where the bug might lie. So, we certainly can't make it P1, ignoring even the fact that this test is in Fortran

[Bug debug/42648] [4.5 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c FAILs at -On, n 0

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42648

[Bug tree-optimization/42729] [4.5 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O1 -fgraphite-identity

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42729

[Bug target/42886] [4.5 Regression] GCC is not relocatable anymore on Windows (mingw32)

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42886

[Bug rtl-optimization/43058] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking uses up all virtual memory

--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 16:56 --- I think this is a critical problem. If var-tracking is causing factor-of-N increases in memory usage, then we need an algorithmic change that prevents that, even if that means inferior debug information. We're

[Bug tree-optimization/43065] [4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20051215-1.c is miscompiled with -fgraphite-identity

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43065

[Bug tree-optimization/43065] [4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20051215-1.c is miscompiled with -fgraphite-identity

--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 16:58 --- I take the P1 setting back; I failed to recognize the use of -fgraphite-identity. As long as that's not a default setting, I don't think problems there should be P1. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug c++/43070] [4.5 Regression] g++.dg/ext/label2.C fails to compile at -O1

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070

[Bug tree-optimization/43083] [4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV with -fgraphite-identity

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43083

[Bug ada/43096] [4.5 Regression] ACATS c37105a wrong-code on arm-linux

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43096

[Bug tree-optimization/43097] [4.5 Regression] ICE in rename_map_elt_info for Graphite, vect in 173.applu

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43097

[Bug target/27016] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ARM optimizer produces severely suboptimal code

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27016

[Bug target/40332] [4.5 Regression] (.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:15 --- I reluctantly agree with Ian's comment in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00332.html that: I think it would be troubling if a gcc release required a very new binutils release on a popular platform like

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] stdarg pass produces wrong code

--- Comment #44 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:20 --- As I understand it, this is an Alpha-specific problem. It may have an Alpha-independent solution, but only users on Alpha will be affected. So, I've downgraded this to P5. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug rtl-optimization/42502] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Bad register allocation in a very simple code

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42502

[Bug middle-end/42505] [4.4/4.5 Regression] loop canonicalization causes a lot of unnecessary temporary variables

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42505

[Bug middle-end/42837] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/packed1.C execution test

--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:27 --- Do we have any evidence that this is actually a regression? If this test has never worked on IA64/HPPA, then this is not a regression. It should then be XFAIL'd on those platforms, with this PR left open

[Bug rtl-optimization/42839] [4.5 Regression] gcc.target/mips/octeon-bbit-2.c failing for -mabi=64

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42839

[Bug fortran/42851] [4.3/4.4/4.5] ICE (segfault) at gfc_trans_pointer_assignment for subpointer

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42851

[Bug java/43055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] 'jc1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault' using gcj -fprofile-arcs

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43055

[Bug c++/43069] [4.5 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'overload' in set_decl_namespace, at cp/name-lookup.c:3105

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43069

[Bug c++/43076] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV with invalid C++ code after giving diagnostics

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43076

[Bug tree-optimization/43084] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:604 with -fipa-struct-reorg -g

--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:38 --- I think we need to understand Steven's comment that ipa-struct-reorg is broken. This pass isn't on by default, AFAICT, so that decreases it's risk. But, if it's broken-by-design, as opposed to has-a-few-bugs

[Bug c++/43101] [4.4/4.5 regression] Rejects template with const static data member used in return type

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43101

[Bug c++/43087] [4.5 Regression] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:9923

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43087

[Bug tree-optimization/43074] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:3491

--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:42 --- Richard, is this fixed now? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43074

[Bug tree-optimization/43066] [4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE with empty struct and va_arg

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43066

[Bug c++/43079] [4.5 Regression] ICE with incompatible pointer-to-member-function as template parameter

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43079

[Bug c++/43093] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling Firefox

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43093

[Bug c++/43075] 20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs

--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:51 --- IIUC, this is not a regression. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/42143] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcj creates dummy variables

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143

[Bug middle-end/42749] [4.5 Regression] -O2 and verify_stmts failed again

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42749

[Bug target/42431] [4.5 Regression] wrong code for 200.sixtrack with vectorization and -fdata-sections

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42431

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-18 04:40 --- Paolo -- I don't understand why all libstdc++ headers should not have #pragma GCC system_header in them. Would you please explain that? I think there's a semantic hair that we could split about whether

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-25 03:14 --- Subject: Bug 42748 Author: mmitchel Date: Mon Jan 25 03:14:25 2010 New Revision: 156202 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156202 Log: PR c++/42748 * config/arm/arm.c

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-25 03:16 --- Fixed. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 19:22 --- Paolo -- I think that the warning is accurate; the mangling of va_list has indeed changed on ARM in GCC 4.4 in order to conform to the ARM ABI specifications. There is an option to turn off warnings about PSABI

[Bug c++/42748] warnings about 'mangling of 'va_list' has changed in GCC 4.4' not suppressed in sytem headers

--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 00:17 --- OK, I will fix this one. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/39251] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/new1.C scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 = .* \+ -

--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 03:26 --- Ramana -- If I'm reading the log correctly for PR36633 the change that Jason made there didn't actually fix the bug; it was just a cleanup. He commented that something else had changed which made the bug go away

[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core

--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 13:54 --- I think the question is whether the use of __optimize__ is in a standard Qt release. If it is, then I'm quite concerned; it's bad if GCC 4.4.2 can't build Qt/KDE. (TBH, I'm concerned anyhow; if __optimize__

[Bug ada/40775] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Ada on ARM ICE in find_valid_class, at reload.c:701

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40775

[Bug target/41156] [4.4/4.5 Regression] zlib segfault in inflate_table() compiled w/ -O -msse2 ftree-vectorize

--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 21:47 --- HJ, this doesn't make sense. Either we can assume 16-byte stack alignment, or we can't. Which is it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41156

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc gcc-4.2.x

--- Comment #32 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 21:48 --- Can anyone confirm that this is fixed? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/40808] [4.4/4.5 regression] member template specialization causes ICE

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40808

[Bug c++/41038] [4.4/4.5 regression] Parsing error related to qualified name id

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41038

[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153

[Bug middle-end/40500] [4.5 Regression] Revision 148512 failed to build binutils

--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 16:10 --- I think maybe it's time for me to get a brain transplant. I had totally forgotten the previous conversation, and read through this entire issue yesterday, and then spent some time thinking about the issue

[Bug c++/41020] [4.5 Regression] Can't declare an extern C friend.

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41020

[Bug tree-optimization/41112] [4.5 regression] ACATS c43205b fails at -O2 (tree-sra)

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41112

[Bug middle-end/40500] [4.5 Regression] Revision 148512 failed to build binutils

--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 01:03 --- I think we should leave this warning out of -Wall. There's a lot of legacy C code that may do this kind of stuff. In C++, it's always been invalid, and there's more of an expectation of structured initialization

[Bug fortran/41043] [4.4/4.5 Regression] virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043

[Bug middle-end/41086] [4.5 Regression]: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c, failing fix for PR41047

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41086

[Bug fortran/41139] [4.5 Regression] a procedure pointer call as actual argument

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41139

[Bug middle-end/40965] [4.5 Regression][graphite] slow compilation

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40965

[Bug tree-optimization/39999] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc 4.4.0 compiles in infinite loop

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3

[Bug bootstrap/39929] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrapping fails at stage 1 on powerpc-ibm-aix

--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 15:13 --- Jules, is the ARM GNU/Linux build still broken? David, how about AIX? Thanks, -- Mark -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/39747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Installation documentation should suggest building libgmp as PIC

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.4/4.5

[Bug rtl-optimization/39871] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] Code size increase on ARM due to inferior CSE

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] CSE|[4.3/4.4/4.5

[Bug middle-end/39898] [4.5 regression] Revision 146763 caused g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39898

[Bug middle-end/39954] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146817 caused unaligned access in gcc.dg/torture/pr26565.c

--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 15:48 --- Yes, we've been discussing the interaction between attributes and the type system for at least a decade. :-) In type-theoretic terms, the address of a packed int has type pointer-to-packed-int, not pointer

[Bug middle-end/39958] [4.5 Regression] OMP tasking creates invalid gimple

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39958

[Bug tree-optimization/39974] [4.5 regression] Bogus array subscript is below array bounds warning in compiler generated code

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39974

[Bug middle-end/39976] [4.5 Regression] Big sixtrack degradation on powerpc 32/64 after revision r146817

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976

[Bug middle-end/39978] [4.5 Regression] SEGV compiling libiberty/regex.c in stage2

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39978

[Bug c++/39987] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Rejects default argument that is a template via access failure

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39987

[Bug c/40026] [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40026

[Bug target/39856] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in subst_stack_regs_pat, at reg-stack.c:1386

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39856

[Bug c++/39862] [4.5 Regression] verify_eh_tree failed with -O2

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39862

[Bug middle-end/39886] [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2274

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39886

[Bug c/39959] [4.5 Regression] IMA is broken

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39959

[Bug tree-optimization/39960] [4.5 Regression] struct-reorg is broken

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39960

[Bug bootstrap/39977] [4.5 Regression] r146817 broke bootstrap on PA

--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 16:00 --- Steve -- Is there still an issue here? -- Mark -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/40021] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146817 miscompiled DAXPY in BLAS

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40021

[Bug middle-end/39666] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] spurious warning with ranged-switch statements

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39666

[Bug middle-end/39927] [4.5 Regression]: build breakage for cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 16:09 --- HP, is this still a problem? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/39955] [4.5 Regression] struct-layout-1 test failures passing struct containing _Decimal32

--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 16:10 --- Janis, is this still an issue? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/40022] [4.4 Regression] Alpine miscompilation

--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 16:11 --- Richard, can this be closed now? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/30210] [4.5 Regression] Altivec builtins have inaccurate return types

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30210

[Bug middle-end/40022] [4.4 Regression] Alpine miscompilation

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40022

[Bug middle-end/39801] New: Builtins are assumed not to throw exceptions, even with -fnon-call-exceptions

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39801

[Bug c++/26266] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] Trouble with static const data members in template classes

--- Comment #24 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-21 22:26 --- The problem isn't the database schema; it's keeping it up to date. I'm not actively working on this issue any more, so I've unassigned myself. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug tree-optimization/39207] [4.4 Regression] Strict aliasing warnings in libstdc++ headers

--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-17 02:53 --- The key question is whether the bogus warning could indicate a potential for miscompilation. If it's just a bogus warning, then it's going to annoy and confuse people, but not result in too much damage

[Bug tree-optimization/39202] [4.4 Regression] internal compiler error: in collapse_rest_of_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3296

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39202

[Bug tree-optimization/39204] [4.4 Regression] ICE in compute_attic

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39204

[Bug libgcj/5303] Undocumented java programs

--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-09 16:20 --- Would the Java maintainers accept a patch to remove addr2name.awk? As far as I can tell, it is no longer used after: 2002-08-24 Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org * Makefile.am (libgcj_la_SOURCES): Remove

[Bug libgcj/5303] Undocumented java programs

--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-09 22:45 --- Patch to remove addr2name.awk now available here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2009-q1/msg00013.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303

[Bug libgcj/5303] Undocumented java programs

--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-09 22:53 --- The patch to remove addr2name.awk has now been committed to mainline. I am not sure what else, if anything, remains on this PR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 20:53 --- Paolo -- I didn't realize that something like __real__ 3 was valid GNU C; I thought that the argument had to have complex type. But, it looks like that is not the case. Given that, yes, I think the test case

[Bug c++/34397] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] ICE on invalid default template parameter

--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 22:35 --- Paolo -- My earlier suggestion to try grok_array_decl may indeed have been misguided. Some of the grok_* functions do more parser-style analysis than we want when processing templates. In theory, the way

[Bug testsuite/36443] [4.3/4.4 Regression]: HOSTCC doesn't work with installed gcc

--- Comment #46 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 22:00 --- As I understand it, the complaint here is that GCC_EXEC_PREFIX being set affects HOSTCC, when HOSTCC is itself some other GCC. But, we have to make sure that the newly built compiler searches the right directory

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >