--- Comment #22 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-25 07:59
---
there is currently no good way to detect if a block is dead during the VRP
pass, as the VRP information is used for *determining* wether or not a block is
dead.
Is there a general warning-queuing implementation
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 09:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=15868)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15868action=view)
slightly shorter (different testcase, same bug)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36745
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 09:25 ---
well, lets keep it at that for now
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-10 22:14 ---
so the code should be changed to
#elif defined(BOOST_PP_ITERATION_DEPTH) BOOST_PP_ITERATION_DEPTH() == 1
?
it is confusing that #elif behaves more like #if and not like #else\n#if
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
.
--
Summary: PR36320 breaks boost
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-29 13:57 ---
how about
extern C void abort();
extern C { static int i; }
int *p = i;
int main()
{
int i;
{
extern int i;
i = 1;
*p = 2;
if (i == 2)
abort ();
}
return 0;
}
in this case, the i
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 17:18 ---
new testcase:
-O2 -fno-gcse -fomit-frame-pointer
=== Cut ===
__extension__ typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t;
typedef unsigned int target_ulong;
register struct CPUX86State *env asm (ebp);
register
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 16:31 ---
the original code uses -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-gcse -O2. I can verify that
-O3 fixes the issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35135
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35135
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 12:55 ---
this seems to be readding the warning with relatively low false positive rate
(e.g. didn't find a false one yet).
--- cp/typeck.c (revision 130658)
+++ cp/typeck.c (working copy)
@@ -5269,11 +5268,16
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 02:23 ---
testing patch for pointer_set conversion
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 02:07 ---
this patch seems to be an alternative way of making -Wstrict-aliasing=3 work
again for the testcase:
--- c-common.c (revision 130658)
+++ c-common.c (working copy)
@@ -1035,7 +1035,8 @@ strict_aliasing_warning
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 22:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=14710)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14710action=view)
testcase
compile with g++ -ansi -O2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34385
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-12-08 02:23:39 |2007-12-08
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34385
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 22:47 ---
diff between broken -fdump-tree-optimized and working one is really small:
--- out.cc.optimized.broken 2007-12-07 23:35:37.460943000 +0100
+++ out.cc.optimized.works 2007-12-07 23:35:53.641747000 +0100
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 10:47 ---
fortify_source=2 is supposed to reject it (only sizeof the struct member, not
the whole struct is allowed).
use fortify_source=1 or fix your broken code.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 11:47 ---
Andrew, read the comments or stop reopening. the behaviour is documented that
way even.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-23 23:02 ---
Subject: Bug 34197
Author: mueller
Date: Fri Nov 23 23:02:21 2007
New Revision: 130385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130385
Log:
2007-11-23 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-23 23:11 ---
Fixed for 4.3
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 22:34 ---
thanks for the analysis. I would go for a slightly more verbose version of the
same patch:
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c (revision 130297)
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c (working copy)
@@ -4339,7 +4339,7 @@ check_array_ref
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 22:40 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34197 ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 22:40 ---
*** Bug 32546 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 11:37 ---
workaround:
--- reg-stack.c (revision 130198)
+++ reg-stack.c (working copy)
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ swap_to_top (rtx insn, stack regstack, r
/* Place operand 1 at the top of stack. */
regno = get_hard_regnum
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34111
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 16:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=14559)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14559action=view)
the preprocessed source
.ii file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34111
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 18:21 ---
temp_stack.reg[i_90] is the access, compare_for_stack_reg is the function,
and i_90 has the VRP determined range [-1, 2147483646].
it shouldn't warn for that. I'll work on a patch.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 23:17 ---
reduced testcase:
class QChar
{
};
struct QString
{
QString(QChar);
};
struct QPainter
{
void drawText (int x, int y, const QString );
};
class KHEChar:public QChar
{
public:KHEChar (QChar C);
};
void
including STL headers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 22:37 ---
I can confirm it as well
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 22:39 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32470 ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 22:39 ---
*** Bug 33399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 11:13 ---
ping.. any results?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 12:43 ---
I`d be happy to help with testing :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-14 07:33 ---
this was introduced by the following patch:
2007-05-30 Russell Yanofsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pedro Lamarao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howard Hinnant [EMAIL
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-14 10:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=13914)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13914action=view)
patch
the following patch moves the change of ranking described in the working draft
under a dialect check
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-13 11:10 ---
unfortunately setting TREE_NO_WARNING on the synthesized delete[] parameters
does not help because it is lost during middle end folding
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-13 11:05 ---
this is yet another case of the middle end folding memory arithmetics back into
an array ref that is out of bounds:
operator delete [] ((void *) A + 0xfffc);
(from orig dump)
later it is:
D
?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756
--- Comment #11 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:27
---
Subject: Bug 31806
Author: mueller
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:27:23 2007
New Revision: 125887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125887
Log:
2007-06-20 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #11 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:27
---
Subject: Bug 31809
Author: mueller
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:27:23 2007
New Revision: 125887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125887
Log:
2007-06-20 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #12 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:28
---
Fixed.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #12 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:28
---
Fixed
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #10 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 23:12
---
Subject: Bug 31806
Author: mueller
Date: Thu Jun 14 23:12:25 2007
New Revision: 125726
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125726
Log:
2007-06-14 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #9 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-08 21:48 ---
Subject: Bug 31806
Author: mueller
Date: Fri Jun 8 21:48:34 2007
New Revision: 125580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125580
Log:
2007-06-08 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #10 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-08 21:48
---
Subject: Bug 31809
Author: mueller
Date: Fri Jun 8 21:48:34 2007
New Revision: 125580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125580
Log:
2007-06-08 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #8 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 15:02 ---
testcase works with gcc 3.4 and gcc 3.3
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 09:06 ---
PR 31806 is not fixed by this, and it contains a reference type.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31809
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-30 22:46 ---
is it okay that was_readonly will eventually turn on TREE_READONLY()
afterwards?
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32135
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-suse-linux
http
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 21:09 ---
Subject: Bug 31227
Author: mueller
Date: Wed Apr 18 21:09:21 2007
New Revision: 123958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123958
Log:
2007-04-18 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 21:10 ---
Fixed in 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-21 09:05 ---
both are caused by our well known offender -fivopts.
the problem why the existing workarounds don't work is because the adress is
first converted to unsigned int before +/- modification is done. the traversal
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-21 14:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=13242)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13242action=view)
patch
this is the patch I'm currently testing. would be nice if you could confirm
that this is also fixing your
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31227
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 12:48 ---
testcase works after PR31146 fix
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31146 ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 12:48 ---
*** Bug 30864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 13:21 ---
it seems to be caused by -r121780
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30864
--- Comment #10 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 23:17
---
Subject: Bug 30860
Author: mueller
Date: Wed Mar 14 23:17:03 2007
New Revision: 122934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122934
Log:
2007-03-15 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #11 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 23:20
---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 17:26
---
Subject: Bug 17946
Author: mueller
Date: Sat Mar 10 17:26:33 2007
New Revision: 122798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122798
Log:
2007-03-10 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #13 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 16:16
---
Subject: Bug 17946
Author: mueller
Date: Fri Mar 9 16:16:35 2007
New Revision: 122751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122751
Log:
2007-03-09 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #14 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 16:17
---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 21:32
---
Great, this patch makes a -fprefetch-loop-arrays bootstrap succeed. I think
LSHIFT_EXPR should be handled similar.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31058
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 10:59 ---
I don't think this is the same testcase. you will get any warning in this case,
because the compiler cannot determine that it is supposed to be dead code.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #9 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 11:34 ---
well, the unrolled body is generated code, it could set TREE_NO_WARNING (for
example). or it could avoid unrolling if its not a flex array.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31058
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #18 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 22:03
---
IIRC there are some cases that are only caught in the 2nd vrp run. It is still
a possibility if this bug cannot be fixed otherwise.
However, I don't see the issue with this testcase.
a) its not a flex array
b
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31058
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-06 15:22 ---
after prefetch-loop-arrays run, vrp2 looks like this:
L81:;
D.1885_87 = r_4(D)-sig[i_13];
D.1886_88 = D.1885_87 + 160B;
__builtin_prefetch (D.1886_88, 1);
r_4(D)-sig[i_13] = 0;
i_8 = i_13 + 1;
i_26
--- Comment #12 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 10:21
---
I've submitted a patch
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 16:43 ---
manu, is this something already covered by your pending -Wconversion fixes?
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 20:23 ---
there is an implicit value conversion, boolean false to address 0. I think
that is the definition of -Wconversion, no?
anyway, I'll work on a patch.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #21 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:43
---
Subject: Bug 30510
Author: mueller
Date: Mon Feb 5 12:43:17 2007
New Revision: 121596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121596
Log:
2007-02-05 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #22 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:43
---
Fixed in 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 13:27 ---
removing diagnostic keyword again. This is latent wrong-code.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mueller at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 13:09 ---
I'm not flagging this as diagnostic for now, because it is imho still a bug in
ccp that could cause other side-effects (aliasing analysis?).
if it is clear that the only problem this causes is the warning
--- Comment #13 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 16:20
---
Subject: Bug 30601
Author: mueller
Date: Tue Jan 30 16:20:06 2007
New Revision: 121342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121342
Log:
2007-01-30 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #45 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 17:17
---
Subject: Bug 8268
Author: mueller
Date: Tue Jan 30 17:17:39 2007
New Revision: 121346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121346
Log:
backport from mainline:
2007-01-21 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL
--- Comment #9 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 17:18 ---
Subject: Bug 30511
Author: mueller
Date: Tue Jan 30 17:17:39 2007
New Revision: 121346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121346
Log:
backport from mainline:
2007-01-21 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30629
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 13:33 ---
ah, no, this doesn't seem to be the same thing.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 15:47 ---
which revision is that? -r121081 fails here
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 16:26 ---
fortran seems to bootstrap now.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 16:12 ---
Subject: Bug 30511
Author: mueller
Date: Sun Jan 21 16:12:10 2007
New Revision: 121032
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121032
Log:
2007-01-21 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 16:52 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mueller at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 20:04 ---
this patch fixes / works around it. I don't like it yet, I'm trying to find a
better solution.
--- tree-vrp.c (revision 120953)
+++ tree-vrp.c (working copy)
@@ -3583,6 +3583,25 @@ check_array_bounds (tree *tp
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 22:15 ---
the ivopts problem is a duplicate of bug 26726.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30511
--- Comment #43 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 13:00
---
Subject: Bug 8268
Author: mueller
Date: Thu Jan 18 13:00:33 2007
New Revision: 120898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120898
Log:
2007-01-18 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Â
--- Comment #44 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 13:12
---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #42 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 10:51
---
no, its going in real soon now (finally) :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8268
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 23:08 ---
Subject: Bug 18313
Author: mueller
Date: Thu Nov 30 23:08:27 2006
New Revision: 119382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119382
Log:
2006-12-01 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 23:11 ---
Implemented for 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
