[Bug c/115310] Option -Werror=return-type is too aggressive with -std=gnu89

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/115307] [avr] Don't expand isinf() like a built-in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115307 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The issue is that we probably fold isinff early. On x86 I see already in .original: return !(ABS_EXPR u<= 3.4028234663852885981170418348451692544e+38); I think your option is to provide optabs for

[Bug target/115282] [15 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-12.c fails after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2e46

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/115303] gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115303 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Yeah, if requiring vect_shift works for you that's pre-approved.

[Bug tree-optimization/115304] gcc.dg/vect/slp-gap-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115304 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail --- Comment #2 from

[Bug ada/115305] [15 Regression] many (162) acats regressions on i686-darwin9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-darwin9 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115278] [13/14 Regression] -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on x86_64 since r13-3219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/115278] [13/14/15 Regression] -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on x86_64 since r13-3219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to avieira from comment #5) > > I think we fixed similar bug on the read side. > > I don't have the best memory, but the one I can remember is PR 111882, where > we had the SAVE_EXPR. And the

[Bug lto/115300] gcc 14 cannot compile itself on Windows when bootstrap-lto is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115300 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Can you try --disable-plugin? It might be the mingw equivalent of exporting all dynamic symbols from the cc1 binary runs into target limitations? It looks like the default on *-*-mingw* is disabled

[Bug tree-optimization/115278] [13/14/15 Regression] -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on x86_64 since r13-3219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/115297] [14/15 regression] alpha: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.cc:7554 with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] alpha: ICE |[14/15 regression] alpha:

[Bug testsuite/115294] [15 regression] dg-additional-files-options change broke several testsuites

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115294 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ada/115292] [15 Regression] i686-darwin17 bootstrap fails for Ada (between r15-856 and r15-889)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115292 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Version|9.0

[Bug c/115290] [12/13/14/15 Regression] tree check fail in c_tree_printer, at c/c-objc-common.cc:330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/115278] [13/14/15 Regression] -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on x86_64 since r13-3219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/115277] [13/14/15 regression] ICF needs to match loop bound estimates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4

[Bug tree-optimization/115298] [15 Regression] Various targets failing DSE tests after recent changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/115282] [15 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-12.c fails after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2e46

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/115275] [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization for Dead Code Elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.3.0 Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/115273] [12 Regression] passing zero to ctz() check missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.4

[Bug debug/115272] [debug] complex type is hard to related back to base type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > How does it work for 'double' vs. 'long double' themselves? > > <1><32>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_type) > <33> DW_AT_byte_size : 16 > <34>

[Bug debug/115272] [debug] complex type is hard to related back to base type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- How does it work for 'double' vs. 'long double' themselves? <1><32>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_type) <33> DW_AT_byte_size : 16 <34> DW_AT_encoding: 4(float) <35>

[Bug tree-optimization/115252] The SLP vectorizer failed to perform automatic vectorization on pixel_sub_wxh of x264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 115252, which changed state. Bug 115252 Summary: The SLP vectorizer failed to perform automatic vectorization on pixel_sub_wxh of x264 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/114435] PCOM messes up vectorization some times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > So the "pcom messes up SLP" part should be fixed now. The pass dependence > of invariant/store motion and unswitching (and likely also loop splitting) is >

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 114435, which changed state. Bug 114435 Summary: PCOM messes up vectorization some times https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 114435, which changed state. Bug 114435 Summary: PCOM messes up vectorization some times https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/114435] PCOM messes up vectorization some times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/114435] PCOM messes up vectorization some times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Ah, the missed store motion is because of the IS_NAN (k) check which makes the memory accesses only conditional executed and thus possibly trap. We "fix" that only during loop unswitching which hoists the

[Bug tree-optimization/114435] PCOM messes up vectorization some times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to jchrist from comment #5) > I tried your patch and it leaves an awful amount of dead stores to the > accumulator within the loop. I also still see the stores inside the loop in > gimple. Is

[Bug tree-optimization/114435] PCOM messes up vectorization some times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/114435] PCOM messes up vectorization some times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114435 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Looking again the reason for the "bad" vectorization with pcom applied is t.c:23:23: missed: Build SLP failed: operation unsupported _51 = r__r0_lsm0.7_7; that is, pcom leaves around SSA name copies

[Bug tree-optimization/115267] [14./15 Regression] Undue warning about undefined behavior in loop with varying limits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115267 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug testsuite/115262] [15 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c fails after r15-831-g05daf617ea22e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/115261] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/s390/vector/vec-abi-vararg-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/115149] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-inline -fno-tree-vrp -fno-ipa-sra -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ch" on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115149 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/115254] [15 Regression] GCN regressions from "Avoid splitting store dataref groups during SLP discovery"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115254 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/115254] [15 Regression] GCN regressions from "Avoid splitting store dataref groups during SLP discovery"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115254 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #5) [..] > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > Note for gcc.dg/vect/vect-gather-4.c with -mgather and gather support in the > > ISA on x86_64 I get

[Bug target/115259] [15 Regressions] GCN vs. "tree-optimization/115144 - improve sinking destination choice"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115259 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/114948] [15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-ch" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114948 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/115236] [15 regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above with -fno-tree-fre and volatile pointers since r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/115258] [14 Regression][aarch64] Additional XORs generated after r14-6290-g9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug tree-optimization/115256] [15 Regression] 502.gcc_r Run failed with '-march=native -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto' since r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115256 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed on Zen3 btw, fails with the test input already. Note that this may still be a latent issue in 502.gcc_r. -funroll-loops isn't neccessary, -O3 -flto was enough to reproduce (no specific

[Bug tree-optimization/115256] [15 Regression] 502.gcc_r Run failed with '-march=native -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto' since r15-571-g1e0ae1f52741f7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/115254] [15 Regression] GCN regressions from "Avoid splitting store dataref groups during SLP discovery"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115254 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The gcc.dg/vect/vect-gather-4.c FAIL should be still present.

[Bug target/115254] [15 Regression] GCN regressions from "Avoid splitting store dataref groups during SLP discovery"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115254 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Note for gcc.dg/vect/vect-gather-4.c with -mgather and gather support in the ISA on x86_64 I get two 'vectorizing stmts using SLP', for f1 and f2 only. Does that match GCN? We unfortunately cannot handle

[Bug target/115254] [15 Regression] GCN regressions from "Avoid splitting store dataref groups during SLP discovery"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115254 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/115253] [14/15 regression] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/115252] The SLP vectorizer failed to perform automatic vectorization on pixel_sub_wxh of x264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug d/115249] [14/15 regression] gdc.test/runnable/test34.d etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115249 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Does it fail on the 14 branch as well? If so the target milestone should be 14.2, otherwise the summary should be [15 Regression]

[Bug target/115248] [15 regresion] aarch64/sve/pre_cond_share_1.c fails since r15-276-gbed6ec161be8c5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/115243] error: stmt with wrong VUSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug tree-optimization/115226] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/115226] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115220] [15 Regression] RISC-V: newlib targets ICE during sink pass triggered in verify_ssa (since r15-815-g5b9b3bae33cae7?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/115245] New: Fails to demangle some concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115245 Bug ID: 115245 Summary: Fails to demangle some concepts Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/115232] [14/15 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass during waccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- I'm opening a new bug for the demangle fail

[Bug tree-optimization/115232] [14/15 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass during waccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||14.1.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/115244] New: virtual operand SSA form verifier imperfect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115244 Bug ID: 115244 Summary: virtual operand SSA form verifier imperfect Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/115226] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115226 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- It's another case where we "skip" a killing def when sinking a store. Here there's a conditional merge of both paths, again violating the virtual operand update constraint.

[Bug tree-optimization/115226] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115226 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It's interesting that SSA verification does not catch a missing virtual PHI from sinking.

[Bug tree-optimization/115236] [15 regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above with -fno-tree-fre and volatile pointers since r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The main issue is that 'c' is a direct node by means of copying the address to MEM[(int * volatile *)] ={v} b.0_1; that makes us not apply STOREDANYTHING to it. It's not exactly clear why we should

[Bug tree-optimization/115220] [15 Regression] RISC-V: newlib targets ICE during sink pass triggered in verify_ssa (since r15-815-g5b9b3bae33cae7?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- OK, so we have a case where we sink a store ignoring a killing use of the VDEF that post-dominates the store. The issue with that is the virtual operand update assumes such stores are on separate paths

[Bug c++/115239] [14/15 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with ambiguous function call in some cases (`const char*` vs `char` with `long` vs `unsigned`)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/115237] -Wsuggest-attribute=pure false positive for obviously non-pure function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/115236] [15 regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above with -fno-tree-fre and volatile pointers since r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/115232] [14/15 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass during waccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115232 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/115228] Suspicious code in tree-vect-data-refs.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-05-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/115226] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/115225] signed integer overflow check missing with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115225 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |sanitizer

[Bug c++/115223] [15 regression] ICE when building KDE kontrast with LTO (error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ has different ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’) since r15-779-g3c98d06a9016a0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |15.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/115221] [15 regression] ICE when building reiser4progs (propagate_updated_value, at gimple-range-cache.cc:1368) since r15-80-g0ade358cd72ffa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |15.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/115220] [15 Regression] RISC-V: newlib targets ICE during sink pass triggered in verify_ssa (since r15-815-g5b9b3bae33cae7?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/115214] tree-ssa-pre.c(ICE in find_or_generate_expression, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2780)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115214 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug other/115211] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -frecord-gcc-switches refactoring lost list of enabled options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) [..] > Ah! Use -Q --help=optimizers (how intuititve...) Or when invoking cc1 omit -quiet. remember to put --help=optimziers after optimization options.

[Bug other/115211] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -frecord-gcc-switches refactoring lost list of enabled options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2) > > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- > > This was done on purpose, you can use -help=optimizers now I think. > > The thread I cited

[Bug bootstrap/115213] [15 regression] Excessive memory use compiling rust with 32-bit gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115213 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com ---

[Bug other/115211] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -frecord-gcc-switches refactoring lost list of enabled options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5 --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/115182] [15 Regression] gcc.target/cris/pr93372-47.c at r15-518-g99b1daae18c095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115182 Bug 115182 depends on bug 115144, which changed state. Bug 115144 Summary: [15 Regression] 2% performance regression for some codes with r15-518-g99b1daae18c095 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115144 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/115144] [15 Regression] 2% performance regression for some codes with r15-518-g99b1daae18c095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115210] Missed optimization opportunity in redundant copies for large structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115210 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/115208] [15 Regression] Memory consumption get extremely high after r15-809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug analyzer/115203] [15 Regression] Build fail with non LANG=C in analyzer self test: ICE in fail_formatted at selftest.cc:63 / tree-diagnostic-path.cc:2158: test_control_flow_5: FAIL: ASSERT_STREQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug tree-optimization/115199] [15 regression] gettext (libtextstyle) testsuite miscompiled since r15-579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115138] [15 Regression] Bootstrap compare-debug fail after r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/115197] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{1,2} with "-fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-pre -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns" on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115197 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug tree-optimization/115138] [15 Regression] Bootstrap compare-debug fail after r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- Yes! Testing a fix for int foo (int) {} int bar (int) {} typedef int (*pred)(int); int x, y; pred A () { if (x) return foo; else return bar; } pred B () { if (y) return foo; else return bar; } int

[Bug tree-optimization/115202] [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization: std::min(f ? (unsigned short)m : a, ~0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115202 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug tree-optimization/115199] [15 regression] gettext (libtextstyle) testsuite miscompiled since r15-579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/115197] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{1,2} with "-fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-pre -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns" on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115197 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.3.0 Version|unknown

[Bug c++/115192] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -O3 miscompilation on x86-64 (loops with vectors and scalars) since r11-6380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|rguenth at gcc

[Bug c++/115192] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -O3 miscompilation on x86-64 (loops with vectors and scalars) since r11-6380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > I'm looking into the first issue. Interesting fact: > > > /space/rguenther/install/gcc-14.1/bin/g++ t.C -O3 -fopt-info-vec > > -fno-tree-slp-vectorize

[Bug c++/115192] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -O3 miscompilation on x86-64 (loops with vectors and scalars) since r11-6380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/115189] libiberty introduces UNC paths waking up binutils bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug target/115188] [14/15 regression] invalid Thumb assembly for atomic store in loop on ARMv6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115188 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Keywords|

[Bug c++/115187] [14/15 Regression] ICE when deleting temporary array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE when deleting temporary |[14/15 Regression] ICE when

[Bug c++/115187] ICE when deleting temporary array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/115138] [15 Regression] Bootstrap compare-debug fail after r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Indeed with boostrap-O3 I can see Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/d/opover.o differs since both have debug info with bootstrap-O3 the difference is only -18:

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, is solaris-sparc big-endian? It seems so. That makes the bitfield access require a VnQImode logical right shift (but little-endian doesn't require it - it's actually bitfield endianess that

[Bug tree-optimization/115138] [15 Regression] Bootstrap compare-debug fail after r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > > I've pushed a fix for PR115137, it's likely this fixes also this bug. > > unfortunately, not; at least, on my

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >