[Bug other/115282] New: 15 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-12.c fails after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2e46

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282 Bug ID: 115282 Summary: 15 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-12.c fails after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2e46 Product: gcc Version: 15.0

[Bug testsuite/115262] New: [15 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c fails after r15-831-g05daf617ea22e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115262 Bug ID: 115262 Summary: [15 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c fails after r15-831-g05daf617ea22e1 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/115174] New: New test case gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115174 Bug ID: 115174 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 fails Product: gcc Version: 13.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/115140] New: [15 regression] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c excess errors after r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115140 Bug ID: 115140 Summary: [15 regression] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof -kernels-1.c excess errors after r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c

[Bug other/115136] [15 regression] experimental/functional/searchers.cc fails after

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115136 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/115136] New: [15 regression] experimental/functional/searchers.cc fails after

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115136 Bug ID: 115136 Summary: [15 regression] experimental/functional/searchers.cc fails after Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/115110] [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu,

[Bug other/115110] New: [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110 Bug ID: 115110 Summary: [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- tests ran OK too.

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried that and with it trunk did finish building. I am running a test of that now.

[Bug bootstrap/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58129 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58129=edit pre-processed failing file

[Bug bootstrap/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu,

[Bug bootstrap/114985] New: [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 Bug ID: 114985 Summary: [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/114939] New: [15 regression] c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c fails after r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114939 Bug ID: 114939 Summary: [15 regression] c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c fails after r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de2 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/114744] test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- also gcc 11

[Bug testsuite/114744] New: test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744 Bug ID: 114744 Summary: test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/114662] New: [14 regression] new test case c_lto_pr113359-2 from r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114662 Bug ID: 114662 Summary: [14 regression] new test case c_lto_pr113359-2 from r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/114642] New: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642 Bug ID: 114642 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/114614] New: New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614 Bug ID: 114614 Summary: New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/114518] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}' powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c" FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c scan-assembler-not \\msrawi\\M # of expected

[Bug testsuite/114518] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114518 Bug ID: 114518 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/combine-2-2.c fails after r14-9692-g839bc42772ba7a Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/114486] New: new test gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c in r14-9668-gc4f2c84e8fa369 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114486 Bug ID: 114486 Summary: new test gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51.c in r14-9668-gc4f2c84e8fa369 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/110316] [11/12/13/14 Regression] g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C and timevar2.C fail erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110316 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Was this only fixed for trunk? I started seeing it for gcc 13: g:5b928badac560ad48e0e9fc480096ff396d9d9c6, r13-8468-g5b928badac560a make -k check-gcc

[Bug analyzer/114343] New: [13 regression] many erratic errors starting with r13-8433-g1277f69b9b0206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114343 Bug ID: 114343 Summary: [13 regression] many erratic errors starting with r13-8433-g1277f69b9b0206 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/114320] New: New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320 Bug ID: 114320 Summary: New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug analyzer/108722] [13/14 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/file-CWE-1341-example.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108722 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libbacktrace/114201] New: [14 regression] r14-9247-gc6d4fb0062c605 breaks a bunch of tests on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114201 Bug ID: 114201 Summary: [14 regression] r14-9247-gc6d4fb0062c605 breaks a bunch of tests on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed you did, thanks!

[Bug other/113961] [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- < previous run: g:1aef0a9b07766d100a218ef3e9576d0a0dd35a2d, r14-9027-g1aef0a9b07766d > this run: g:7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d, r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 < FAIL:

[Bug other/113961] New: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113961 Bug ID: 113961 Summary: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails in new place after r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad98 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug other/113931] New: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails after r14-8998-gc9ce332b557bb9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113931 Bug ID: 113931 Summary: [14 regression] 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc fails after r14-8998-gc9ce332b557bb9 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/113085] New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I posted the LE stuff already but here it is again: spawn [open ...]^M unsufficient lockable memory; please increase ulimit FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test

[Bug testsuite/113085] New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I should note that pinned-2 also fails on powerpc64 LE. make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS="c.exp=libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-*" FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test FAIL:

[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |---

[Bug c++/113710] [14 Regression] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 ICE: canonical types differ for identical types since r14-8710-g65b4cba9d6a9ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113710 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgomp/113448] libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c etc. XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113448 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/113685] New: [14 regression] xxx fails after yyy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113685 Bug ID: 113685 Summary: [14 regression] xxx fails after yyy Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug testsuite/109705] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/113621] New: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113621 Bug ID: 113621 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/optional_absent_10.f90 from r14-8400-g186ae6d2cb93ad fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/113317] New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- >From experimenting this seems to be an issue with the system compiler gcc version 11.4.0 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) I tried an older compiler (8.4) and it worked ok. I just experimented

[Bug other/113317] New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am seeing this on a power 9 LE machine. This was my configure: configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --enable-secureplt --with-cpu=power9 --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib I also

[Bug testsuite/113428] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c fails after r14-7158-gb5476e4c881b0d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428 Bug ID: 113428 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c fails after r14-7158-gb5476e4c881b0d Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/113344] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c fails after r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113344 Bug ID: 113344 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c fails after r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/113317] New: New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113317 Bug ID: 113317 Summary: New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with ICE Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- There was a mistake in my report. This was on a power 9 BE system, not LE. Configure was: /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/configure --prefix=/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test

[Bug sanitizer/113284] New: [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 Bug ID: 113284 Summary: [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/112534] [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Did it work?

[Bug testsuite/113085] New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like it is 65,536 seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ getconf PAGESIZE 65536

[Bug middle-end/113100] [14 regression] many strub tests fail after r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113100 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64le-linux-gnu

[Bug middle-end/113100] New: [14 regression] many strub tests fail after r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113100 Bug ID: 113100 Summary: [14 regression] many strub tests fail after r14-6737-g4e0a467302fea5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/113085] New: New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 Bug ID: 113085 Summary: New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/113038] New: [14 regression] Excess errors for g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038 Bug ID: 113038 Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/112848] [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112848 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Of course it fails with r14-6114 as that is the source. Doh! I was looking at pr112827.

[Bug tree-optimization/112848] New: [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112848 Bug ID: 112848 Summary: [14 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-16.c after r14-6114-gde0ab339a79535 Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug middle-end/112822] New: [14 regression] ICE: invalid RHS for gimple memory store after r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112822 Bug ID: 112822 Summary: [14 regression] ICE: invalid RHS for gimple memory store after r14-5831-gaae723d360ca26 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/112788] New: [14 regression] ICEs in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206 after r14-5972-gea19de921b01a6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112788 Bug ID: 112788 Summary: [14 regression] ICEs in fold_range, at range-op.cc:206 after r14-5972-gea19de921b01a6 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112751] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112751 Bug ID: 112751 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112606] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu: 'FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-fp.c scan-assembler xsnabsdp'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112606 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/112735] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c fails after r14-5666-g41aacdea55c5d7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112735 Bug ID: 112735 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c fails after r14-5666-g41aacdea55c5d7 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/112731] New: [14 regression] Excess errors for c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c after r14-5615-g509b470dcee979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112731 Bug ID: 112731 Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for c-c++-common/builtin-classify-type-1.c after r14-5615-g509b470dcee979 Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug bootstrap/112534] New: [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534 Bug ID: 112534 Summary: [14 regression] build failure after r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/112522] New: [14 regression] g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C fails with excess errors after r14-5310-g879cf9ff45d940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112522 Bug ID: 112522 Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C fails with excess errors after r14-5310-g879cf9ff45d940 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug testsuite/112340] New: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112340 Bug ID: 112340 Summary: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112103] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Bug ID: 112103 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am still seeing the same failure on power. tried with g:668c4c3783970e7adf0591396b6d0d5286cc0541, r14-4930-g668c4c3783970e make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'

[Bug middle-end/111868] New: [14 regression] many ICEs after r14-4710

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111868 Bug ID: 111868 Summary: [14 regression] many ICEs after r14-4710 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/111852] [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks building with gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111852 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yup, thanks! In another 4.8.5 breakage PR someone mentioned removing that as the minimum required compiler level. Has there been any more discussion of that?

[Bug middle-end/111866] New: [14 regression] ICE when compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111866 Bug ID: 111866 Summary: [14 regression] ICE when compiling Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug testsuite/111850] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it does look like an improvement ad I doubt the number of addis really matters. That's why I said the test probably just needs to be updated.

[Bug bootstrap/111852] New: [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks building with gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111852 Bug ID: 111852 Summary: [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks building with gcc 4.8.5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/110831] [14 regression] gcc.dg/stack-check-3.c ICEs after r14-2822-g499b8079a6419b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug testsuite/111850] New: [14 regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 Bug ID: 111850 Summary: [14 regression] Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee:

[Bug bootstrap/111812] [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/111812] [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried a build with r14-4659-ga22eeaca5ce753 and I see the following which looks like it might be the mentioned union issues. g++ -std=gnu++11 -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC

[Bug bootstrap/111812] [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug bootstrap/111812] New: [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812 Bug ID: 111812 Summary: [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc breaks build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This system is on RHEL 8 which has gcc 8.5 as the distro compiler. And yes, the patch worked.

[Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787 Bug ID: 111787 Summary: [14 regression] xxx breaks build Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug middle-end/111777] [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- That patch works fine on a system where the build was failing.

[Bug middle-end/111777] [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oops, wrong system. On the failing one it shows: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 5.1

[Bug middle-end/111777] [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug bootstrap/111777] New: [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777 Bug ID: 111777 Summary: [14 regression] build breaks after r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- If you need me to try something let me know.

[Bug bootstrap/111688] New: [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 Bug ID: 111688 Summary: [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/111686] New: [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686 Bug ID: 111686 Summary: [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1

[Bug bootstrap/111664] [14 regression] Fails to build with mawk (error in gcc/opt-read.awk) after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I installed gawk on the machine where it failed and the build works now. So definitely mawk.

[Bug fortran/111644] [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug bootstrap/111664] New: [14 regression] error in gcc/opt-read.awk after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 Bug ID: 111664 Summary: [14 regression] error in gcc/opt-read.awk after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/111644] New: [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644 Bug ID: 111644 Summary: [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/111603] New: [14 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c in r14-4280-gc3c6f30496d945 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111603 Bug ID: 111603 Summary: [14 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c in r14-4280-gc3c6f30496d945 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c++/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- From, the original I cut it down to this. Compiles OK with r14-4110, error with r14-4111. bad3.c: In member function 'NameIdPoolEnumerator& NameIdPoolEnumerator::operator=(const

[Bug other/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can't attach the whole thing but I am working on cutting it down.

[Bug other/111544] New: [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 Bug ID: 111544 Summary: [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/111480] New: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111480 Bug ID: 111480 Summary: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/111465] [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 55926 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55926=edit preprocessed .ii file Yup, that looks like the culprit. Preprocessed file attached.

[Bug bootstrap/111465] New: [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465 Bug ID: 111465 Summary: [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also this one: make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c -flto

[Bug tree-optimization/111462] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 Bug ID: 111462 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >