http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This statement is a little ambiguous to me, which is the current situation?
>
> A) There are no plans to alter sigtramp-android.c to support ARM
> architectures below ARMv7. Patches would be accepted thou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #24 from John Marino ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #22)
> > Does this mean effectively nothing lower than ARMv7 can build
> > arm-*-linux-androideabi?
>
> Apparently so, but it should be quite easy to fix this in
> sigtr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #23 from John Marino ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #17)
> In the end, there were 6 failures.
>
> C52103x
> C52104x
> C52104y
> c74004a (hung)
> cb1010c
> cb1010d
To follow up, I reworked the testsuite handler to reduce t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
> When I tried to build the ARMv5 cross compiler (-march=armv5te) I get the
> following error:
>
> /tmp//cc5BKnWK.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp//cc5BKnWK.s:31: Error: selected processor does not support Thum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #21 from John Marino ---
Hi Eric,
When I tried to build the ARMv5 cross compiler (-march=armv5te) I get the
following error:
/tmp//cc5BKnWK.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp//cc5BKnWK.s:31: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
> ah sorry, I always seem to conclude wrongly that stack checking requires
> unwind support. I'm not sure why I always conflate those two things.
Yes, it does, but it first needs to be fully functional.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #19 from John Marino ---
ah sorry, I always seem to conclude wrongly that stack checking requires unwind
support. I'm not sure why I always conflate those two things.
So this patch was proposed 9 months ago but never got committed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ---
> In the end, there were 6 failures. It appears that the ARM unwinder isn't
> quite right yet. After 2314 passes, the six ACATS failures were:
>
> C52103x
> C52104x
> C52104y
> c74004a (hung)
> cb1010c
> c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #17 from John Marino ---
Hi Eric,
In the end, there were 6 failures. It appears that the ARM unwinder isn't
quite right yet. After 2314 passes, the six ACATS failures were:
C52103x
C52104x
C52104y
c74004a (hung)
cb1010c
cb1010d
Joh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The compiler builds happily now.
Great, thanks for the quick feedback.
> It started right into ACATS testing and has passed the first 3 chapters
> flawlessly (with the current setup ACATS takes hours beca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #15 from John Marino ---
Hi Eric,
The compiler builds happily now.
It started right into ACATS testing and has passed the first 3 chapters
flawlessly (with the current setup ACATS takes hours because each test is
SCP'd/SSH'd to the dev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|ADA bootstrap fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
Sorry about the mess, can you try after the latest change?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 07:57:48 2014
New Revision: 209237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* s-osinte-android.ads: Adjust.
Modified:
tru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #12 from John Marino ---
I am also seeing these errors:
s-intman.adb:263:32: "SA_NODEFER" is not visible
s-intman.adb:263:32: non-visible declaration at s-linux.ads:110
s-intman.adb:263:45: "SA_RESTART" is not visible
s-intman.adb:263
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
John Marino changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnugcc at marino dot st
--- Comment #11 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 8 20:35:14 2014
New Revision: 209227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209227&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* sigtramp.h: Add Android support.
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 8 09:03:42 2014
New Revision: 209211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* sigtramp-armdroid.c: New file.
Added:
trunk/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 8 08:23:56 2014
New Revision: 209210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (arm% linux-android): S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #7 from charlet at adacore dot com ---
> the cross build for arm-linux-gnueabihf succeeds again.
Great.
> So they use the same system.ads, which now links with a-exexpr-gcc.adb;
> Should'nt this target now also use EH_MECHANISM=-gcc
> the cross build for arm-linux-gnueabihf succeeds again.
Great.
> So they use the same system.ads, which now links with a-exexpr-gcc.adb;
> Should'nt this target now also use EH_MECHANISM=-gcc or -arm?
Yes, android should also use
EH_MECHANISM=-arm
I'll make that change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #4)
> Let me know how things go after the recent commit I made on trunk, thanks.
I'll try that on monday,
but how about linux-androideabi?
isn't that one broken now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Mar 7 20:35:33 2014
New Revision: 208419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208419&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-07 Doug Rupp
PR ada/60411
* system-linux-armel.ads (B
25 matches
Mail list logo
