http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #18 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14
19:35:10 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Mon Jan 14 19:35:03 2013
New Revision: 195173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195173
Log:
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #16 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21 18:54:05
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Fri Dec 21 18:54:00 2012
New Revision: 194676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194676
Log:
2012-12-21 Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21
01:52:47 UTC ---
Steve, the patch referenced in comment 12 makes sense to me. I agree with
Jakub's comment that the first hunk shouldn't make any difference, because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10
10:57:53 UTC ---
Alex, any opinions here?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 21:46:55
UTC ---
Proposed patch has been posted to gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02089.html
Use NONDEBUG_INSN_P instead of INSN_P in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #11 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-28 23:07:25
UTC ---
I think the problem is the use of INSN_P instead of NONDEBUG_INSN_P in
build_insn_chain (ira.c). Changing this fixes the small test case and I will
do a full
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-15 18:01:58
UTC ---
That is correct, the original test fails with -fcompare-debug on a mipsel*
target
or a mips* (big-endian) target. The cutdown test case only fails on mips*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-15 23:21:42
UTC ---
Created attachment 28026
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28026
Cutdown test case that fails in little endian mode
Here is a second cut-down
12 matches
Mail list logo