http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-07 12:08:27 UTC ---
I can now confirm that using g++ 4.7 as bootstrap compiler works out of
the box. Even with the problems I've observed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07
12:55:39 UTC ---
But that is not a requirement. The requirement is using a C++ compiler that
works out of the box (compiler configured in a path where its shared
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-07 13:06:16 UTC ---
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07
12:55:39 UTC ---
But that is not a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
11:58:33 UTC ---
I don't think so: even on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, when building an
i686-unknown-linux-gnu compiler with an unbundled gcc 4.4 (which does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
12:04:19 UTC ---
Given that -static-libstdc++ has been added to trunk in 2009-06-25, and gcc 4.4
has been branched 2009-03-27, you'd need to have local patches on top of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-19 14:33:55 UTC ---
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
12:04:19 UTC ---
Given that -static-libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:06:21 UTC ---
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
10:30:12 UTC ---
So not a bug then?
I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
12:09:52 UTC ---
If you don't add that /vol/gcc-4.4/lib/ to ld.so.conf (or ld.so.conf.d), it is
your responsibility to build with LD_LIBRARY_PATH, otherwise you are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:12:32 UTC ---
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
12:09:52 UTC ---
If you don't add that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
21:40:38 UTC ---
The general assumption on non-cross scenarios is that we're able to run a
program created by CC and CXX. If this is not the case, not even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17
23:31:22 UTC ---
Does it happen with a recent bootstrap compiler, i.e. for which
-static-libstdc++ is implemented, if you don't set --with-host-libstdcxx? I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-11-16 09:11:36 UTC ---
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
01:06:20 UTC ---
Does this still happen?
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 13:53:37 UTC
---
Created attachment 28030
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28030
hacky patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16
15:29:24 UTC ---
Maybe related that we don't build a host libstdc++-v3 but only a target one:
target_modules = { module= libstdc++-v3;
bootstrap=true;
20 matches
Mail list logo
