http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-20
09:37:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 20 09:37:25 2012
New Revision: 189707
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189707
Log:
PR c++/28656
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from falk at debian dot org 2006-10-13 12:43 ---
From the standard:
[...] n can have the value zero on a call to that function. Unless
explicitly stated otherwise in the description of a particular
function in this subclause, pointer arguments on such a call shall
--- Comment #3 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-10-13 21:02 ---
You're right, I missed that. I confess I don't quite understand the rationale
for this in the standard and I'm not aware of any plaform that causes problems
for such calls but based on Doug Gwyn's response to my query
--- Comment #4 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-10-13 21:09 ---
I opened bug 29465 with a request for the new warning.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 21:14 ---
One question is the duplicated warning a regression and is it a C++ front-end
problem or also a C one too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656
