[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

2011-09-23 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

2011-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5, 4.5.2,

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

2011-05-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

2011-05-16 Thread JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2011-05-16 19:17:06 UTC --- Ok, I will have to look into it, thanks, mike On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:19 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

2010-10-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-01 07:24:14 UTC --- If you're testing features marked experimental then please use a current release or search existing bug reports, this doesn't seem to crash with 4.4.4 or