https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael.espindola at ic dot
unicamp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #21 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Aug 7 16:40:18 2018
New Revision: 263361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263361=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-08-07 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59480, DR 136
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini ---
That's good to know, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #15)
> Tobias, I'm currently playing with something like the attached, which seems
> only moderately more complex and passes all my tests so far. If you have
> ways
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44413|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini ---
If we can exploit DECL_HIDDEN_FRIEND_P of the olddecl everything is much
easier: see attached draft which I'm probably going to resubmit as-is of with
only minor modifications.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini ---
Created attachment 44413
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44413=edit
Only draft front-end changes, no testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini ---
Tobias, I'm currently playing with something like the attached, which seems
only moderately more complex and passes all my tests so far. If you have ways
to further stress it, I would be glad to hear about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini ---
Another testcase that we want to accept:
class Matrix;
void rot90 (const Matrix& a, int k = 1) { }
class Matrix {
friend void rot90 (const Matrix&, int);
};
void rot90 (const Matrix& a, int k);
We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jul 19 16:58:06 2018
New Revision: 262883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262883=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-19 Paolo Carlini
Revert fix for c++/59480 (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini ---
Umpf. Unfortunately this doesn't work because the second time we see rot90
duplicate_decls smashes together the first two declarations and we end up with
a friend declaration which has the defaults and as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jul 18 10:27:12 2018
New Revision: 262851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262851=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-07-18 Paolo Carlini
* class.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
And on the very next slide they give another example of a bug accepted by
GCC, which is rejected by every version of GCC I tried,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-12-14 00:00:00 |2015-8-24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
Strangely enough, this is one of the bugs in GCC that OpenMandriva
developers present as a reason for them switching to Clang as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And the next slide shows a missing warning, that actually GCC has warned
about since 4.8
And the next slide is a gnu89-inline issue, which would also show up with GCC 5
due to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See also http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#136
24 matches
Mail list logo
